Restaurant Feasibility Study and SBA Loan Data

The SBA loan record for full-service restaurant projects nationally and by state, and what a feasibility study for one has to test.

Full-service restaurant feasibility study consultant

Loan Analytics works as a full-service restaurant feasibility study consultant for lenders and the borrowers they finance: we deliver the independent study a credit officer weighs before committing to a sit-down dining room, whether a chef-led independent, a family restaurant or a franchised casual-dining unit. From FY2017 to FY2026, SBA approved 28,716 full-service restaurant loans through 7(a) for $14.04 billion, a $246,000 median, and 3,515 through 504 for $2.87 billion, a $606,000 median. California holds 4,184 of those loans and $2.50 billion, and one lender, The Huntington National Bank, approved 3,167, a count no state but California reaches.

The record also shows how these loans end, and our study is built to answer it. Charge-offs on 7(a) restaurant loans funded in FY2017 to FY2021 have already reached a floor of 6.7%, and 3.9% within 5 years; the 504 floors are 0.94% and 0.44%. Cancellation before funding has a floor of 13.2% for 504 approvals and 12.5% for 7(a). Texas, second to California in restaurant dollars with $1.52 billion, prints a 9.5% floor, and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 11.2%. So the study tests what sits behind those numbers: the covers and average check the trade area can support, the dining rooms of the same concept and price already competing for them, the build-out and opening budget, the lease, and debt service at the sales of a slow first year.

Where the project sits and what it buys change the questions. A request in Georgia is read beside a $459,000 state median, one in Ohio beside $85,000 and one in Hawaii beside $55,000, and a 504 purchase of land and a building is a different credit from a 7(a) leasehold fit-out. We set each request beside the rows below for its state, metro, likely lender and loan size, fit the scope to the lender's own requirements, and the conclusion the credit committee reads carries the signature of Daniel Smith, MAI.

Request Scope & Timeline

Sit-down restaurants by the numbers

Full-service restaurants hold a deep SBA record: 28,716 approvals under 7(a) worth $14.04 billion over FY2017 to FY2026, at a median of $246,000, and 3,515 under 504 worth $2.87 billion, at a median of $606,000. Annual 7(a) approvals slid from a FY2017 level of 3,566 to 1,932 by FY2021, as dining rooms closed and reopened, and recovered to 3,574 in FY2025 with $1.78 billion approved; FY2026 brought 2,797 loans. Lending through 504 was busiest in FY2022, with 465 loans and $393.3 million.

Where restaurant losses sit

A floor of 6.7% of 7(a) restaurant loans from the fiscal 2017 to 2021 disbursement years has been charged off, and that cohort includes the pandemic closures. The 504 floor for those years is 0.94%, so even property-backed restaurant loans have produced some losses. Cancellation after approval runs at 12.5% under 7(a) and 13.2% under 504. A lender can read those numbers as a reason to size restaurant loans to the cash flow of a full year of operation and to want equity that can absorb a slow opening.

California leads with 4,184 loans and $2.50 billion. New York ranks next by count, 2,192 loans, but with $902.2 million it trails Texas, which has 2,151 loans and $1.52 billion, and Florida, with 1,871 and $1.43 billion. Ohio's 1,602 loans total only $429.1 million, and Vermont's 104 loans just $15.8 million, a sign of small dining rooms. Wyoming closes the list with 37 loans.

Covers, check average and the lease

A restaurant feasibility study must translate the site into covers: seats, turns by daypart and the average check, tested against competing restaurants of the same concept and price point in the trade area. It needs the household incomes, daytime population and tourism or event draw that feed demand, and a view on liquor license availability where alcohol sales matter. Cost includes the kitchen, hood and grease systems, dining room, bar and pre-opening expense, plus the working capital to carry the ramp. Debt service coverage should hold at a sales level below the plan, with food and labor at current market cost. The appraisal faces the question every restaurant lender asks: how much of the build-out a second operator would pay for, since second-generation restaurant space often trades on the kitchen alone.

The class counts sit-down restaurants by the borrower's industry code, independent and chain alike. Bars without full food service, quick-service units and caterers fall under other codes and other pages.

SBA loan record for full-service restaurant, United States, FY2017 to FY2026

ProgramLoansDollarsMedian loanCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
SBA 7(a) 28,716$14.04 billion $246,000 12.5% 6.7%
SBA 504 3,515$2.87 billion $606,000 13.2% 0.94%

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for full-service restaurant, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#record-C34.

Cancellation counts FY2017 to FY2024 approvals; charge-off counts FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans to date. Both are floors, and a rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort.

SBA 7(a) full-service restaurant loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

01000200030004000FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 3566Loans, FY2018: 3410Loans, FY2019: 2978Loans, FY2020: 2006Loans, FY2021: 1932Loans, FY2022: 2250Loans, FY2023: 2896Loans, FY2024: 3307Loans, FY2025: 3574Loans, FY2026: 2797
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY20173,566$1.41 billion
FY20183,410$1.33 billion
FY20192,978$1.34 billion
FY20202,006$882.2 million
FY20211,932$1.28 billion
FY20222,250$1.25 billion
FY20232,896$1.52 billion
FY20243,307$1.66 billion
FY20253,574$1.78 billion
FY20262,797$1.57 billion

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for full-service restaurant, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#record-C34.

SBA 504 full-service restaurant loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

0100200300400500FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 367Loans, FY2018: 303Loans, FY2019: 334Loans, FY2020: 299Loans, FY2021: 337Loans, FY2022: 465Loans, FY2023: 364Loans, FY2024: 336Loans, FY2025: 379Loans, FY2026: 331
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY2017367$235.2 million
FY2018303$192.4 million
FY2019334$229.6 million
FY2020299$215.6 million
FY2021337$249.8 million
FY2022465$393.3 million
FY2023364$318.7 million
FY2024336$314.2 million
FY2025379$396.5 million
FY2026331$326.3 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for full-service restaurant, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#record-C34.

States and other areas with the most full-service restaurant loans

State or areaLoansDollars
California4,184$2.50 billion
New York2,192$902.2 million
Texas2,151$1.52 billion
Florida1,871$1.43 billion
Ohio1,602$429.1 million
Illinois1,317$759.6 million
Michigan1,204$440.5 million
New Jersey1,203$796.4 million
Pennsylvania1,170$568.0 million
Georgia1,169$829.0 million
Massachusetts1,126$404.9 million
Washington1,092$556.9 million
Minnesota816$351.3 million
Colorado802$488.5 million
North Carolina687$479.3 million
Wisconsin651$319.1 million
Indiana626$272.3 million
Virginia565$253.3 million
Arizona506$339.2 million
Missouri495$236.5 million
Maryland471$246.0 million
Oregon458$181.0 million
Connecticut413$135.7 million
South Carolina365$243.3 million
Utah357$217.5 million
New Hampshire316$88.2 million
Nevada305$179.3 million
Puerto Rico302$58.5 million
Tennessee289$175.3 million
Maine256$87.3 million
Oklahoma254$110.4 million
Alabama253$147.0 million
Iowa242$74.8 million
Rhode Island237$87.7 million
Louisiana235$141.2 million
Kentucky224$89.9 million
Idaho205$99.4 million
Arkansas165$58.9 million
Kansas159$74.4 million
Mississippi159$63.6 million
Nebraska149$55.2 million
Hawaii116$38.8 million
District of Columbia115$76.6 million
West Virginia106$35.1 million
Vermont104$15.8 million
New Mexico98$49.1 million
Montana95$39.1 million
South Dakota91$41.1 million
Delaware85$34.8 million
North Dakota74$36.0 million
Alaska54$31.1 million
Wyoming37$20.1 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for full-service restaurant, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#record-C34.

Full-service restaurant feasibility study data by state

Full-service restaurant feasibility study data by metro area

Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30.

SBA lending to full-service restaurant projects, FY1991 to FY2026

Every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan approved for a full-service restaurant project since FY1991, by fiscal year, nationally.

Where the long series can be read

Read from FY1991, the restaurant series starts almost empty: FY1993 to FY1995 are not measured, the other years before FY1998 print single-digit 7(a) counts, and FY1998 shows 201 7(a) loans for $40.0 million. The table's own note explains why: a year counts only the loans SBA's files code to the class, and when too few carry a usable code the year drops out. FY1999 is the first year that looks like a working market, at 1,751 7(a) loans and $394.2 million. A study that calls restaurant lending a growth story since FY1991 is reporting SBA's coding; ours measures long-run change from FY1999.

The FY2007 peak and the FY2009 trough

From FY2000 the 7(a) count rose every year to FY2007 apart from a slip in FY2006, and reached 5,033 loans and $1.01 billion in FY2007, a count no other year in the series matches; 504 reached its count peak the same year, 643 loans for $365.8 million. By FY2009 the count was down to 2,086, the fewest since FY2000, with dollars at $525.7 million, and 504 had fallen to 321 loans and $158.7 million. A dining room financed near a lending peak still owes its debt when lending tightens, so our study reports the sales level at which the restaurant stops covering debt service, not only the plan case.

Fewer loans, larger loans

The 7(a) count never regained its FY2007 level: no year after FY2008 reaches even the 4,035 loans of FY2004, and the best since is FY2025, with 3,574. Dollars came back much sooner. FY2015 carried $1.21 billion on 3,209 loans, the first year above FY2007's $1.01 billion. Today's restaurant request therefore lands in a book of larger loans than lenders held before FY2009, and a reviewer will ask whether the project's cost fits that book. The study answers with a cost plan that separates real estate or lease, fit-out, kitchen and bar equipment, opening expense and working capital.

The pandemic years inside the loss cohort

7(a) approvals fell from 2,978 in FY2019 to 2,006 in FY2020 and 1,932 in FY2021, below even FY2009. FY2020 dollars fell to $882.2 million, yet FY2021 carried $1.28 billion, more than any year before FY2017. 504 rose as 7(a) bottomed, to 337 loans in FY2021 and 465 for $393.3 million in FY2022, the same turn it made after FY2009, when it climbed to 538 loans in FY2012. Every charge-off floor printed here is measured on loans that funded between FY2017 and FY2021, which puts these years inside it: the 6.7% 7(a) floor includes restaurants that borrowed just before or during the closures. The table cannot say how much of the floor those years explain, so the study tests the subject's own coverage at reduced sales rather than arguing the cohort away.

FY2022 to FY2026: record dollars, no measured losses yet

Every year from FY2023 to FY2026 carried more 7(a) restaurant dollars than any year up to FY2022: $1.52 billion in FY2023, $1.66 billion in FY2024, $1.78 billion in FY2025 and $1.57 billion on 2,797 loans in FY2026. Under 504, FY2025's $396.5 million is the largest dollar year in the record, just above FY2022's $393.3 million. Across the whole record SBA approved 84,267 7(a) restaurant loans for $28.66 billion and 10,527 504 loans for $6.57 billion. None of the loans from FY2022 onward sits in the charge-off cohort, so the heaviest dollar years have no measured loss rate. A lender funding at this pace asks the saturation question first, and the study answers it with an inventory of competing full-service restaurants in the trade area.

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to full-service restaurant projects by fiscal year
Fiscal yearSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
FY19911fewer than 5 loansnot measurednot measured
FY19921fewer than 5 loansnot measurednot measured
FY1993not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1994not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1995not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY19964fewer than 5 loansnot measurednot measured
FY19976$2.9 millionnot measurednot measured
FY1998201$40.0 million19$6.1 million
FY19991,751$394.2 million149$48.9 million
FY20001,420$331.7 million110$36.4 million
FY20012,885$620.2 million286$120.5 million
FY20023,242$771.0 million300$128.3 million
FY20033,294$681.9 million355$156.2 million
FY20044,035$839.7 million436$194.9 million
FY20054,454$887.0 million492$263.0 million
FY20064,417$952.1 million552$278.4 million
FY20075,033$1.01 billion643$365.8 million
FY20083,765$932.9 million531$277.2 million
FY20092,086$525.7 million321$158.7 million
FY20102,275$663.5 million417$221.8 million
FY20112,721$944.0 million452$259.4 million
FY20122,348$791.5 million538$321.8 million
FY20132,385$871.6 million394$225.8 million
FY20142,642$919.6 million341$217.9 million
FY20153,209$1.21 billion322$191.0 million
FY20163,376$1.24 billion354$222.7 million
FY20173,566$1.41 billion367$235.2 million
FY20183,410$1.33 billion303$192.4 million
FY20192,978$1.34 billion334$229.6 million
FY20202,006$882.2 million299$215.6 million
FY20211,932$1.28 billion337$249.8 million
FY20222,250$1.25 billion465$393.3 million
FY20232,896$1.52 billion364$318.7 million
FY20243,307$1.66 billion336$314.2 million
FY20253,574$1.78 billion379$396.5 million
FY20262,797$1.57 billion331$326.3 million
FY1991 to FY202684,267$28.66 billion10,527$6.57 billion
FY2017 to FY202628,716$14.04 billion3,515$2.87 billion

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. A class figure counts the loans whose NAICS code places them in the class; in years when SBA's files leave the code missing or unplaceable for more than one loan in a hundred, the figure is a floor, and where too few loans are coded the year is not measured. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to full-service restaurant projects by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#sba-record-sba-by-year.

Back to the contents

Every state ranked for full-service restaurant lending

SBA loans to full-service restaurant projects in each state from FY2017 to FY2026, ranked, with loan size, program split and the cohort floors where at least 30 loans support them.

Count and dollars rank the states differently

California leads on both measures, 4,184 loans and $2.50 billion, but below it the rankings part. New York is second by count with 2,192 loans yet fourth by dollars at $902.2 million, behind Texas ($1.52 billion on 2,151 loans) and Florida ($1.43 billion on 1,871). Ohio is fifth by count, 1,602 loans, but thirteenth by dollars, $429.1 million. Georgia moves the opposite way: tenth by count with 1,169 loans and fifth by dollars with $829.0 million, ahead of New Jersey and Illinois. The useful ranking for a study is the one built on comparable loans: a Georgia request belongs beside a book of large loans, an Ohio request beside small ones.

Medians from $459,000 down to $55,000

Georgia's $459,000 median tops every state, followed by North Carolina at $432,000, Florida at $430,000, Texas at $427,500 and Arizona at $404,000. The bottom is Hawaii at $55,000, Ohio at $85,000, Vermont at $90,000 and West Virginia at $100,000. Big books sit at both ends: Texas and Florida combine large counts with large loans, Ohio pairs a large count with the second-smallest median, and New York's $150,000 sits well below California's $330,000. Before leaning on any state median, the study must settle what kind of project the subject is, a leased fit-out, the purchase of an operating restaurant or land and a building, and compare it with loans of the same kind.

Loss floors do not follow region

Vermont prints the highest state charge-off floor, 11.7% on 104 loans, then Virginia and South Carolina at 10.9%, Alabama at 10.8% and Arkansas at 9.6%. The lowest printed floors are New Mexico's 0.00% on 98 loans, Mississippi's 1.2% and Maine's 1.6%; Alaska and Wyoming print none, because their cohorts hold fewer than 30 loans. Neighbours disagree sharply. In the East South Central division Alabama prints 10.8% and Mississippi 1.2%; Virginia's 10.9% sits beside Maryland's 5.8%, and South Carolina's 10.9% beside Georgia's 5.7%. Among the four largest books, Texas is highest at 9.5%, then New York at 7.9%, Florida at 7.1% and California at 6.6%, while Michigan (3.8%), Pennsylvania and Massachusetts (3.4%) sit low. A state floor is thin evidence about one restaurant, and we never lend a neighbour's floor to a state that does not print one.

Cancellation measures a different risk

Cancellation floors count FY2017 to FY2024 approvals that were never disbursed, and they rank the states another way again. Rhode Island is highest at 17.0%, then New York at 16.9%, Maryland at 16.6% and Tennessee at 16.1%; Alaska's 2.3% is the lowest. Vermont has the highest charge-off floor yet one of the lowest cancellation floors, 6.8%, while Maine is low on both. Why an approval lapsed is not in the table. For a borrower in New York or Maryland the lesson is to settle cost, lease terms, equity and the opening date before the lender commits, since those are the facts a study tests.

Where 504 carries more of the book

Nationally 7(a) carries the class, 28,716 restaurant loans to 3,515 under 504, but the split varies widely. California has the most 504 restaurant loans, 408, then Florida with 271 and Massachusetts with 252 beside only 874 under 7(a). Minnesota (164 against 652 under 7(a)), Wisconsin (134 against 517), South Dakota (37 against 54) and North Dakota (28 against 46) also lean on 504, while New York has 142 against 2,050 and Tennessee 10 against 279. This page's own summary calls 504 restaurant loans property-backed, so where they are common the study is expected to value the building as a later operator would; where 7(a) dominates, cash flow and the lease carry the case.

SBA full-service restaurant loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026
StateLoansDollarsMedian loanSBA 7(a) loansSBA 504 loansCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
California4,184$2.50 billion$330,0003,77640813.0%6.6%
New York2,192$902.2 million$150,0002,05014216.9%7.9%
Texas2,151$1.52 billion$427,5001,99116012.3%9.5%
Florida1,871$1.43 billion$430,0001,60027114.3%7.1%
Ohio1,602$429.1 million$85,0001,5327011.5%6.1%
Illinois1,317$759.6 million$304,0001,10321414.7%8.0%
Michigan1,204$440.5 million$150,0001,1069812.6%3.8%
New Jersey1,203$796.4 million$300,0001,1386515.3%6.7%
Pennsylvania1,170$568.0 million$225,0001,0769413.2%3.4%
Georgia1,169$829.0 million$459,0001,04612312.4%5.7%
Massachusetts1,126$404.9 million$180,00087425213.3%3.4%
Washington1,092$556.9 million$323,5001,0326014.2%4.5%
Minnesota816$351.3 million$250,0006521648.7%4.1%
Colorado802$488.5 million$350,00068811412.7%4.3%
North Carolina687$479.3 million$432,0006394810.7%7.1%
Wisconsin651$319.1 million$290,0005171347.9%5.2%
Indiana626$272.3 million$229,5005408610.7%4.1%
Virginia565$253.3 million$275,000505609.0%10.9%
Arizona506$339.2 million$404,0004297711.3%4.6%
Missouri495$236.5 million$267,8004445110.3%8.9%
Maryland471$246.0 million$250,0004452616.6%5.8%
Oregon458$181.0 million$200,0004283015.1%4.5%
Connecticut413$135.7 million$150,0003793414.3%5.6%
South Carolina365$243.3 million$385,0003343114.4%10.9%
Utah357$217.5 million$341,000271867.6%2.5%
New Hampshire316$88.2 million$127,7502575910.0%2.5%
Nevada305$179.3 million$350,0002723310.9%5.0%
Tennessee289$175.3 million$350,0002791016.1%7.4%
Maine256$87.3 million$178,000190666.4%1.6%
Oklahoma254$110.4 million$270,250227277.5%4.0%
Alabama253$147.0 million$331,0002223112.5%10.8%
Iowa242$74.8 million$184,0002192310.5%5.5%
Rhode Island237$87.7 million$150,0001825517.0%7.8%
Louisiana235$141.2 million$303,5002181714.1%8.3%
Kentucky224$89.9 million$206,850205199.0%6.9%
Idaho205$99.4 million$306,000169366.9%4.6%
Arkansas165$58.9 million$225,000152139.1%9.6%
Kansas159$74.4 million$269,0001421710.0%3.4%
Mississippi159$63.6 million$202,80015096.8%1.2%
Nebraska149$55.2 million$159,000138117.6%2.7%
Hawaii116$38.8 million$55,000109712.1%5.9%
West Virginia106$35.1 million$100,000103313.8%6.1%
Vermont104$15.8 million$90,0009866.8%11.7%
New Mexico98$49.1 million$348,000782013.3%0.00%
Montana95$39.1 million$250,00075206.5%1.9%
South Dakota91$41.1 million$317,000543712.5%7.7%
Delaware85$34.8 million$150,00083210.6%5.9%
North Dakota74$36.0 million$305,50046289.5%2.8%
Alaska54$31.1 million$348,50042122.3%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Wyoming37$20.1 million$270,000307not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA full-service restaurant loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#states-states.

Back to the contents

Metro areas ranked for full-service restaurant lending

The metropolitan and micropolitan areas with a full-service restaurant loan record, ranked by SBA loans.

Metros that cross state lines

The New York-Newark-Jersey City metro holds 2,275 restaurant loans and $1.27 billion, more on both counts than New York State's 2,192 loans and $902.2 million, because the metro takes in its New Jersey side. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim follows with 1,635 loans and $963.0 million, then Chicago-Naperville-Elgin with 1,146, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington with 914, Boston-Cambridge-Newton with 885 and Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell with 836. A trade area follows roads, not borders, so a study for a site in Jersey City or Camden uses the metro row as its first comparison and the state row second.

Loan size by metro

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell's $487,750 median is the largest among the leading metros, ahead of Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington at $455,000 and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands at $440,750, while Boston-Cambridge-Newton ($199,000), New York-Newark-Jersey City ($200,000) and Detroit-Warren-Dearborn ($177,000) lend far smaller. Florida metros crowd the top of the whole list: Jacksonville at $580,000, Port St. Lucie at $553,000, North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota at $551,000, Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford at $518,500 and Naples-Marco Island at $512,400. The highest median of all is Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, $700,000 on 33 loans. A leasehold request read against medians this high needs the study to say why it is smaller.

Ohio and the small-loan metros

The smallest medians cluster in Ohio: Toledo, Youngstown-Warren, Canton-Massillon and Sandusky all print $50,000, Akron $54,150, Cleveland $71,100 and Columbus $100,000, consistent with the $85,000 state median. Rochester ($65,000) and Syracuse ($78,000) set upstate New York apart from the $200,000 New York-Newark-Jersey City median. Cleveland's 372 loans total $93.0 million, while Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler's 348 total $232.4 million. A $1 million request in an Ohio metro sits far from the local book, so a lender expects the study to account for the gap: another format, a real estate purchase, or a concept the market has not yet tested.

Floors diverge inside one state

Texas shows the spread most clearly: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington prints 11.2%, Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 9.2% and Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos 6.5%. In Ohio, Akron's 15.5% is the highest metro floor on the page and Toledo prints 11.1%, while Columbus prints 4.0% and Cleveland 3.8%. California runs from Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura at 11.9% to Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario at 4.5%, and Florida's spread runs from Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach at 10.4% to Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater at 4.0%. Small loans do not explain the pattern: Cleveland, at a $71,100 median, has one of the lowest printed floors and Akron, at $54,150, the highest. A study that quotes Texas's 9.5% for a Dallas site, or Dallas's 11.2% for a town outside it, has picked the wrong comparison.

Withheld floors, zero floors and thin markets

Many metro floors are withheld, among them Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler (348 loans), Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas (236) and Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford (224). A withheld floor has no value here and is not a zero; a study for one of those metros cites the printed state floor, 4.6% for Arizona, 5.0% for Nevada or 7.1% for Florida, and labels it as such. Colorado Springs (113 loans) and Atlantic City-Hammonton (84) print 0.00%, measured but still a minimum. The list runs down to Heber, UT Micro Area with 25 loans and includes Lebanon-Claremont, NH-VT (56 loans) and Branson, MO (26). In markets this thin, the comparable set comes from fieldwork: restaurants of the same concept and check, visited, with the seasonal pattern measured rather than assumed.

SBA full-service restaurant loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026
Metro or micro areaLoansDollarsMedian loanCharged off (floor)
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ Metro Area2,275$1.27 billion$200,0008.5%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metro Area1,635$963.0 million$300,0006.9%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN Metro Area1,146$692.7 million$325,9507.3%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Area914$627.7 million$455,00011.2%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Metro Area885$316.1 million$199,0003.2%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA Metro Area836$613.3 million$487,7505.6%
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metro Area694$380.2 million$347,5004.1%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metro Area618$420.3 million$350,0004.3%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Area609$311.0 million$281,40010.7%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metro Area574$342.3 million$340,0007.1%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metro Area569$280.8 million$300,0005.4%
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metro Area492$209.0 million$177,0003.2%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX Metro Area466$365.4 million$440,7509.2%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metro Area449$270.6 million$335,0004.5%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL Metro Area447$368.7 million$414,50010.4%
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO Metro Area403$255.6 million$350,0005.0%
Cleveland, OH Metro Area372$93.0 million$71,1003.8%
Columbus, OH Metro Area368$102.4 million$100,0004.0%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ Metro Area348$232.4 million$408,500withheld
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metro Area348$231.2 million$350,0004.0%
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA Metro Area345$192.1 million$301,3008.9%
Pittsburgh, PA Metro Area332$115.2 million$148,5004.4%
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA Metro Area307$111.8 million$150,0006.8%
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Metro Area304$145.7 million$242,5504.5%
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Metro Area276$104.4 million$180,0006.6%
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metro Area266$198.9 million$475,5006.5%
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA Metro Area244$145.9 million$350,0007.1%
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD Metro Area243$126.6 million$250,000withheld
Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN Metro Area241$122.1 million$225,0005.0%
Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV Metro Area236$139.7 million$350,000withheld
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL Metro Area224$184.7 million$518,500withheld
San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas, PR Metro Area218$45.9 million$100,000withheld
St. Louis, MO-IL Metro Area204$115.1 million$350,0007.3%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metro Area203$132.3 million$350,0008.2%
Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI Metro Area196$116.9 million$462,500withheld
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Metro Area182$136.0 million$480,000withheld
Jacksonville, FL Metro Area180$149.3 million$580,0008.5%
Portland-South Portland, ME Metro Area180$65.0 million$200,000withheld
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI Metro Area178$63.3 million$130,650withheld
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY Metro Area165$39.0 million$100,000withheld
Salt Lake City-Murray, UT Metro Area158$106.0 million$300,700withheld
Kansas City, MO-KS Metro Area156$79.5 million$281,200withheld
Rochester, NY Metro Area153$24.3 million$65,00013.6%
Raleigh-Cary, NC Metro Area141$97.8 million$500,000withheld
San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metro Area131$100.1 million$500,000withheld
Akron, OH Metro Area128$31.8 million$54,15015.5%
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Metro Area125$60.2 million$200,000withheld
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN Metro Area125$95.1 million$400,000withheld
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN Metro Area120$58.2 million$331,500withheld
Colorado Springs, CO Metro Area113$60.7 million$350,0000.00%
Barnstable Town, MA Metro Area104$50.2 million$250,400withheld
Oklahoma City, OK Metro Area102$52.8 million$322,500withheld
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metro Area99$58.4 million$310,00011.9%
Toledo, OH Metro Area99$17.2 million$50,00011.1%
Tulsa, OK Metro Area96$34.5 million$214,750withheld
Boise City, ID Metro Area95$57.2 million$350,000withheld
Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC Metro Area93$57.4 million$311,000withheld
Urban Honolulu, HI Metro Area89$23.7 million$50,000withheld
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL Metro Area87$69.2 million$487,000withheld
New Orleans-Metairie, LA Metro Area87$51.2 million$273,200withheld
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL Metro Area87$71.6 million$551,000withheld
Omaha, NE-IA Metro Area85$32.8 million$225,000withheld
Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ Metro Area84$81.5 million$579,7500.00%
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Metro Area82$26.6 million$222,500withheld
Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC Metro Area80$39.7 million$355,600withheld
Springfield, MO Metro Area79$34.8 million$235,000withheld
Worcester, MA Metro Area79$28.3 million$208,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Metro Area77$42.9 million$400,000withheld
Birmingham, AL Metro Area75$39.1 million$296,100withheld
Syracuse, NY Metro Area75$10.8 million$78,000withheld
Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY Metro Area73$25.1 million$150,000withheld
Richmond, VA Metro Area72$24.9 million$274,150withheld
Manchester-Nashua, NH Metro Area71$22.8 million$138,000withheld
Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA Metro Area70$24.8 million$227,100withheld
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Metro Area70$41.5 million$401,000withheld
Savannah, GA Metro Area69$46.0 million$483,000withheld
Madison, WI Metro Area68$31.2 million$291,000withheld
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL Metro Area68$44.6 million$375,000withheld
Youngstown-Warren, OH Metro Area68$13.2 million$50,000withheld
Wilmington, NC Metro Area67$51.3 million$400,000withheld
Boulder, CO Metro Area66$36.9 million$399,000withheld
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR Metro Area66$27.3 million$233,550withheld
Memphis, TN-MS-AR Metro Area66$37.4 million$350,000withheld
Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA Metro Area65$30.6 million$350,000withheld
Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL Metro Area62$35.9 million$350,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH Metro Area61$20.3 million$150,000withheld
Asheville, NC Metro Area60$26.7 million$195,000withheld
Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metro Area59$49.3 million$517,500withheld
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL Metro Area58$44.4 million$390,250withheld
Canton-Massillon, OH Metro Area57$12.1 million$50,000withheld
Duluth, MN-WI Metro Area57$16.8 million$150,000withheld
Flint, MI Metro Area57$16.1 million$98,500withheld
Lebanon-Claremont, NH-VT Micro Area56$15.3 million$150,000withheld
Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT Metro Area55$25.6 million$359,000withheld
Salinas, CA Metro Area55$39.5 million$380,000withheld
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC Metro Area54$42.8 million$472,750withheld
Fresno, CA Metro Area53$38.5 million$424,000withheld
Columbia, SC Metro Area52$32.6 million$350,000withheld
El Paso, TX Metro Area52$28.1 million$350,000withheld
Lansing-East Lansing, MI Metro Area50$19.4 million$164,950withheld
Jackson, MS Metro Area49$16.6 million$205,500withheld
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA Metro Area49$29.4 million$400,000withheld
Greeley, CO Metro Area47$24.0 million$374,000withheld
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC Metro Area46$32.1 million$465,000withheld
Port St. Lucie, FL Metro Area46$39.3 million$553,000withheld
Reno, NV Metro Area46$30.5 million$437,500withheld
Tucson, AZ Metro Area46$35.3 million$456,000withheld
Burlington-South Burlington, VT Metro Area45$6.2 million$80,000withheld
Naples-Marco Island, FL Metro Area45$34.1 million$512,400withheld
Bakersfield-Delano, CA Metro Area44$27.8 million$438,500withheld
Fort Wayne, IN Metro Area44$25.6 million$293,250withheld
San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA Metro Area44$41.3 million$497,000withheld
Springfield, MA Metro Area44$8.6 million$87,500withheld
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO Metro Area43$32.7 million$492,500not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA Metro Area42$29.1 million$287,500withheld
Sioux Falls, SD-MN Metro Area42$23.4 million$403,500withheld
Ann Arbor, MI Metro Area41$20.0 million$200,000withheld
Knoxville, TN Metro Area41$23.7 million$350,000withheld
Baton Rouge, LA Metro Area40$25.5 million$362,500withheld
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA Metro Area40$15.1 million$213,000withheld
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Metro Area40$22.1 million$202,000withheld
Traverse City, MI Metro Area40$12.5 million$229,500withheld
Lancaster, PA Metro Area39$27.5 million$350,000withheld
Ogden, UT Metro Area39$27.5 million$401,500withheld
Green Bay, WI Metro Area38$22.6 million$401,500withheld
Salem, OR Metro Area38$10.6 million$52,800withheld
Albuquerque, NM Metro Area37$20.4 million$180,000withheld
Evansville, IN Metro Area37$17.4 million$346,900withheld
Greensboro-High Point, NC Metro Area37$25.3 million$491,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
St. George, UT Metro Area37$19.9 million$386,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA Metro Area37$22.9 million$345,000withheld
Wichita, KS Metro Area37$16.2 million$250,000withheld
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ Metro Area36$27.4 million$458,000withheld
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA Metro Area36$27.4 million$424,850withheld
Vallejo, CA Metro Area36$27.1 million$569,250withheld
Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal, SC Metro Area35$22.9 million$350,000withheld
Reading, PA Metro Area35$14.4 million$275,700withheld
Stockton-Lodi, CA Metro Area35$29.5 million$418,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Trenton-Princeton, NJ Metro Area35$19.3 million$296,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
York-Hanover, PA Metro Area35$13.7 million$150,000withheld
Columbia, MO Metro Area34$13.8 million$198,500withheld
Kennewick-Richland, WA Metro Area33$9.6 million$144,000withheld
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX Metro Area33$12.7 million$270,000withheld
Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC Metro Area33$33.7 million$700,000withheld
Huntsville, AL Metro Area32$14.9 million$355,000withheld
Modesto, CA Metro Area32$16.2 million$348,000withheld
Springfield, IL Metro Area32$10.9 million$246,000withheld
Anchorage, AK Metro Area31$21.9 million$500,000withheld
Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA Metro Area30$12.5 million$290,250withheld
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL Metro Area30$20.5 million$470,150withheld
St. Cloud, MN Metro Area30$9.4 million$257,450withheld
Bend, OR Metro Area29$13.6 million$439,300withheld
Coeur d'Alene, ID Metro Area29$19.6 million$500,000withheld
Lexington-Fayette, KY Metro Area29$13.7 million$350,000withheld
Lincoln, NE Metro Area29$8.9 million$123,400withheld
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR Metro Area29$10.3 million$275,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Sandusky, OH Metro Area29$5.7 million$50,000withheld
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL Metro Area28$8.3 million$190,050withheld
Eugene-Springfield, OR Metro Area28$8.5 million$196,400withheld
Fargo, ND-MN Metro Area28$12.8 million$310,000withheld
Holland, MI Micro Area28$6.6 million$108,500not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN Metro Area28$14.2 million$150,000withheld
Saginaw, MI Metro Area28$6.9 million$147,000withheld
Appleton, WI Metro Area27$13.1 million$315,300withheld
Bellingham, WA Metro Area27$7.3 million$241,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL Metro Area27$20.7 million$500,000withheld
Pittsfield, MA Metro Area27$3.2 million$50,000withheld
Seaford, DE Micro Area27$7.7 million$100,000withheld
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI Metro Area27$10.0 million$177,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Branson, MO Micro Area26$12.5 million$241,850withheld
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS Metro Area26$11.0 million$241,650withheld
Kalamazoo-Portage, MI Metro Area26$6.7 million$123,450withheld
Tallahassee, FL Metro Area26$14.3 million$336,050withheld
Heber, UT Micro Area25$17.2 million$350,000withheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA full-service restaurant loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#metros-metros.

Back to the contents

SBA lenders to full-service restaurant projects

The lenders with a recorded book of full-service restaurant loans, ranked; no lender with fewer than 5 loans is listed.

One lender ahead of every state but one

The Huntington National Bank approved 3,167 full-service restaurant loans for $850.1 million from FY2017 to FY2026, more than New York, Texas or Florida recorded in total; only California, with 4,184, has more. Next is Newtek Bank, National Association, 960 loans for $352.8 million. Behind them sit Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company at 893, TD Bank, National Association at 867 and U.S. Bank, National Association at 839. One bank's credit policy therefore stands behind a larger restaurant book than any state's but California's, and a study for a file at that bank is read by a credit team with its own deep restaurant history.

Small-ticket and large-ticket books

Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company approved 893 loans for $130.0 million and U.S. Bank, National Association 839 for $118.3 million, while Bank of Hope approved $314.3 million on 647 loans, Byline Bank $247.3 million on 230 and Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC $225.5 million on 198. A lender whose restaurant book is built on small loans reads a large build-out request as an exception; a lender with a large-ticket book has its own comparables for it. The study is written for the reader it will actually have.

Lender floors from 0.00% to 47.2%

Independence Bank's 47.2%, on 53 loans and $6.8 million, is the highest rate on the page; BayFirst National Bank prints 17.3% on 304 loans, Wells Fargo Bank National Association 15.1% on 476 and TD Bank, National Association 13.7%. The Huntington National Bank's 7.8% sits a little above the class's 6.7% 7(a) floor. Printing 0.00% are Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, Granite State Economic Development Corporation, The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation, Florida Business Development Corporation and Enterprise Bank & Trust, among others; several carry 'Development Corporation' in their names, and their results sit nearer the class's 0.94% 504 floor than its 7(a) floor.

Books too new to carry a floor

Newtek Bank, National Association has the second-largest book by count, 960 loans, yet prints no floor: it is reported with fewer than 30 loans in the FY2017 to FY2021 cohort, so its restaurant lending has not yet been through the charge-off measure in numbers large enough to report. Readycap Lending, LLC (437 loans) and Northeast Bank (ME) (704) carry withheld floors, which this page does not fill and our studies do not estimate.

Puerto Rico's lenders

Puerto Rico, counted as an area rather than a state, has 302 restaurant loans for $58.5 million, and the San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas metro holds 218 of them, $45.9 million at a $100,000 median. Lenders on the table with Puerto Rico in their names are Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, 147 loans for $15.2 million, and FirstBank Puerto Rico, 37 loans for $6.7 million. These are small loans on a thin record, and a study for an island restaurant draws its comparables from the island's own dining rooms rather than from mainland medians.

SBA lenders by full-service restaurant loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026
LenderLoansDollarsCharged off (floor)
The Huntington National Bank3,167$850.1 million7.8%
Newtek Bank, National Association960$352.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company893$130.0 million11.0%
TD Bank, National Association867$139.2 million13.7%
U.S. Bank, National Association839$118.3 million8.2%
Northeast Bank (ME)704$121.3 millionwithheld
Bank of Hope647$314.3 million8.1%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association620$179.8 million7.4%
KeyBank National Association508$193.6 million6.1%
Wells Fargo Bank National Association476$126.7 million15.1%
Readycap Lending, LLC437$276.8 millionwithheld
Santander Bank, National Association414$75.4 millionwithheld
PNC Bank, National Association402$124.0 million6.3%
Celtic Bank Corporation383$250.3 million9.9%
Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC367$269.9 million7.7%
Hanmi Bank320$178.6 million7.9%
BayFirst National Bank304$106.9 million17.3%
Fifth Third Bank252$102.6 million8.7%
Columbia Bank (OR)237$93.2 million6.3%
Eastern Bank233$44.6 million6.5%
Byline Bank230$247.3 million8.0%
Beacon Bank and Trust209$206.6 millionwithheld
PCB Bank208$130.7 millionwithheld
Bank of America, National Association202$118.9 millionwithheld
Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC198$225.5 million0.00%
Granite State Economic Development Corporation192$105.4 million0.00%
Commonwealth Business Bank177$130.0 millionwithheld
Empire State Certified Development Corporation172$145.1 millionwithheld
SouthState Bank, National Association170$118.4 millionwithheld
East West Bank169$94.5 millionwithheld
Truist Bank167$140.0 million4.1%
The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation163$164.5 million0.00%
Lendistry SBLC, LLC163$44.1 millionwithheld
Zions Bancorporation, National Association162$62.1 million7.4%
NewBank153$114.0 million6.5%
Florida Business Development Corporation150$142.8 million0.00%
Metro City Bank149$157.8 millionwithheld
Florida First Capital Finance Corporation, Inc.148$169.1 million0.00%
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico147$15.2 millionwithheld
Live Oak Banking Company135$152.0 millionwithheld
CDC Small Business Finance Corp.130$73.2 million10.0%
Open Bank130$74.2 millionwithheld
Enterprise Bank & Trust128$144.0 million0.00%
Small Business Growth Corporation127withheldwithheld
Midwest Regional Bank127$91.1 million10.3%
Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB125$112.0 millionwithheld
WBD, Inc.122$87.8 million0.00%
Old National Bank120$73.4 millionwithheld
Fulton Bank, National Association119withheld0.00%
Stearns Bank National Association114$46.2 millionwithheld
First Internet Bank of Indiana113$132.6 millionwithheld
Bay Colony Development Corporation112$68.6 millionwithheld
BMO Bank National Association112$78.3 millionwithheld
Banner Bank112$35.2 millionwithheld
Pinnacle Bank (TN)111$124.4 millionwithheld
Mountain West Small Business Finance97$74.2 millionwithheld
First Bank (NC)97$114.1 million7.9%
TowneBank97$75.7 millionwithheld
Citizens Bank (TN)91$75.2 millionwithheld
Plumas Bank89$58.9 millionwithheld
California Statewide Certified Development Corporation88$75.8 millionwithheld
United Community Bank (SC)87$83.8 millionwithheld
Capital Certified Development Corporation86$94.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
GBC International Bank84$51.0 millionwithheld
New Millennium Bank83$62.3 million0.00%
Northwest Bank (PA)82$36.7 millionwithheld
First National Bank of Pennsylvania82$49.9 million17.2%
SomerCor 504, Inc.81$59.7 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Woori America Bank80$48.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Citizens Bank, National Association80$35.9 million0.00%
B:Side Capital79$57.7 millionwithheld
PromiseOne Bank76$46.2 millionwithheld
Oriental Bank73withheld0.00%
Sunrise Banks National Association72$27.0 millionwithheld
First Merchants Bank71$56.8 millionwithheld
Rockland Trust Company71$19.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Trenton Business Assistance Corporation69$63.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Renasant Bank66$46.4 millionwithheld
First Commonwealth Bank66$53.2 millionwithheld
Bangor Savings Bank65$10.8 millionwithheld
Business Finance Capital64$74.8 millionwithheld
LiftFund, Inc.64$50.0 millionwithheld
Shinhan Bank America64$40.8 millionwithheld
New England Certified Development Corporation63$41.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Centerstone SBA Lending, Inc.63$55.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company62$55.0 millionwithheld
Simmons Bank62$42.1 millionwithheld
VelocitySBA, LLC62$64.0 millionwithheld
Midwest Business Finance Corporation60$33.9 millionwithheld
Central Pacific Bank59$6.3 millionwithheld
Arvest Bank59$17.8 millionwithheld
First Bank of the Lake58$62.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
The Bancorp Bank National Association58$53.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
United Business Bank58$45.3 millionwithheld
Michigan Certified Development Corporation56$31.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
US Metro Bank56$53.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
CRF Small Business Loan Company, LLC56$36.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company55$49.7 millionwithheld
Hancock Whitney Bank55$27.4 millionwithheld
Frost Bank55$34.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
BancFirst54$29.4 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Glacier Bank54$34.4 millionwithheld
America First Federal Credit Union54$61.3 millionwithheld
First Interstate Bank53$22.4 millionwithheld
Regions Bank53$44.1 millionwithheld
Colony Bank53$28.2 millionwithheld
Independence Bank53$6.8 million47.2%
Mid Penn Bank53$33.2 millionwithheld
Bank Five Nine51$50.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Nicolet National Bank50$21.7 millionwithheld
Mountain America FCU50$13.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Port 51 Lending LLC49$72.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Happen Bank48$71.6 millionwithheld
1st Source Bank48$8.4 millionwithheld
Business Finance Group, Inc.47$41.5 millionwithheld
North State Bank47$38.4 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Peoples Bank (OH)46withheldwithheld
Valley National Bank45$52.7 millionwithheld
Rural Missouri, Inc.44$24.2 millionwithheld
Seacoast National Bank44$32.8 millionwithheld
Citibank, N.A.44$5.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Customers Bank43$38.9 millionwithheld
Evergreen Business Capital42$28.1 millionwithheld
IncredibleBank42$42.8 millionwithheld
Heritage Bank (WA)42$25.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
First National Bank of Omaha42$10.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Community Bank of Mississippi42$9.4 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Main Street Launch42$9.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Twin Cities-Metro Certified Development Company41$34.1 millionwithheld
Liberty Bank (CT)41$5.6 millionwithheld
CenTrust Bank, A Division of SmartBiz Bank National Association41$21.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Dime Commercial Bank41withheldwithheld
Northeast Entrepreneur Fund, Inc.41$5.0 millionwithheld
Arizona Capital Source40$20.9 millionwithheld
Prosperity Bank40$38.9 millionwithheld
Cambridge Savings Bank40$15.6 millionwithheld
Wallis Bank40$33.5 millionwithheld
Heritage Bank Inc40$31.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
OakStar Bank40$30.6 millionwithheld
Unity Bank (NJ)39$46.9 millionwithheld
BankUnited, National Association39$34.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Citizens Business Bank National Association38$29.5 millionwithheld
Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company38$21.1 millionwithheld
Village Bank and Trust, National Association38$18.8 millionwithheld
American Continental Bank38$32.5 millionwithheld
New York Business Development Corporation38$23.7 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Great Lakes Commercial Finance37$26.0 millionwithheld
Washington Trust Bank37$29.8 millionwithheld
FirstBank Puerto Rico37$6.7 millionwithheld
Busey Bank36$42.1 millionwithheld
Trustmark Bank36$8.5 millionwithheld
First Financial Bank (OH)36$16.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
ESL FCU36$2.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Business Expansion Funding Corporation35$30.3 millionwithheld
HomeTrust Bank35$43.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
BankFirst Financial Services35$13.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
AMPAC Tri-State CDC, Inc.34$18.6 millionwithheld
BankVista34$12.8 millionwithheld
West Coast Community Bank34$18.5 millionwithheld
Hanover Community Bank34$39.4 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
CalPrivate Bank33$33.1 millionwithheld
Ameris Bank32$28.5 millionwithheld
Exchange Bank (CA)32$24.5 millionwithheld
German American Bank31$14.0 millionwithheld
First Mid Bank & Trust, National Association31$15.3 millionwithheld
Premier Capital Corporation30$17.8 millionwithheld
Ocean State Business Development Authority30$18.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Amplio Economic Development Corporation30$21.8 millionwithheld
Provident Bank30$34.4 millionwithheld
The Bank of Princeton30$20.5 millionwithheld
Harborstone CU30$15.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Capital Matrix, Inc.29$21.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
PeopleFund29$8.6 millionwithheld
Centennial Bank (AR)29$25.9 millionwithheld
NBT Bank, National Association29$6.6 millionwithheld
504 Capital Corporation28$21.7 millionwithheld
Community Investment Corporation28$12.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Peapack Private Bank and Trust28$22.5 millionwithheld
Community Banks of Colorado, A Division of NBH Bank28$17.7 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Grasshopper Bank National Association28$21.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Bank OZK27$10.1 millionwithheld
Northwest Bank (ID)27$17.1 millionwithheld
UMB Bank, National Association27$16.7 millionwithheld
CSRA Local Development Corporation26$25.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Growth Capital Corp.26$6.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Northwest Business Development Association26$16.9 millionwithheld
American Bank (LA)26$21.9 millionwithheld
The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank26$4.5 millionwithheld
Republic Bank & Trust Company26$12.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Pathward National Association26$42.0 millionwithheld
NEPA Alliance Business Finance Corporation25$9.2 millionwithheld
Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank25$5.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Centier Bank25$11.5 millionwithheld
Hiawatha National Bank25$4.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Kennebunk Savings Bank25$6.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Cathay Bank25$16.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Monterey County Bank25$12.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
EagleBank25$10.9 millionwithheld
First United Bank and Trust Company25$17.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
First Horizon Bank25$26.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Choice Financial Group25$16.5 millionwithheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA lenders by full-service restaurant loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#lenders-lenders.

Back to the contents

Loan sizes, program split and cohort floors for full-service restaurant loans

How large full-service restaurant loans run under each SBA program, how they fall into size bands, and how often they were cancelled or charged off.

Two programs, two loan sizes

Restaurant 7(a) loans run from a $74,000 lower quartile through a $246,000 median to a $575,000 upper quartile; under 504 the same points are $346,500, $606,000 and $1.1 million. So the 504 lower quartile already outruns the 7(a) median, and the middle 504 loan clears the 7(a) upper quartile. The programs finance different restaurant projects: the 7(a) study centers on the operator, the lease and the opening, while the 504 study adds the property and its value.

Where the loans and the dollars sit

At $150,000 or less, 7(a) records 11,944 restaurant loans, the largest count of any band, yet just $828.4 million. Loans over $350,000 to $1 million number 6,778 and carry the most dollars, $4.18 billion, while those over $2 million to $5 million number 1,289 for $3.82 billion, outweighing the band beneath them in dollars on far fewer loans. Nothing over $5 million appears under 7(a). A request in that top occupied band joins a group of 1,289, and the lender will expect a full market, cost and coverage analysis, with a view of what the property and its kitchen are worth to a second operator.

504 sits in the middle bands

504 restaurant loans concentrate in the middle: 1,661 loans for $1.02 billion between $350,000 and $1 million and 735 for $1.01 billion over $1 million to $2 million, against 141 at $150,000 or less, whose dollars are withheld. A $1 million request sits near the 504 upper quartile of $1.1 million but well above the 7(a) upper quartile of $575,000, so the reviewer's frame of reference depends on the program.

Charge-offs continue after year five

Within 5 years of funding, 3.9% of the FY2017 to FY2021 7(a) restaurant cohort has been charged off at the least, and 6.7% to date; the 504 figures are 0.44% and 0.94%. In both programs the to-date floor is above the five-year floor, so some loans that came through their first five years were charged off later. A study usually models the opening and ramp years, but these floors show the exposure running past them, into lease renewals, refreshes of kitchen and dining room, and changes in the trade area. Our coverage test carries the loan beyond stabilization for that reason.

Cancellation runs higher under 504

Cancellation floors are 13.2% under 504 and 12.5% under 7(a), so the program with far lower loss floors loses slightly more approvals before funding. A property-backed approval depends on an appraisal, a cost budget and a closing that a leasehold loan may not need, and each is a point where a restaurant commitment can lapse. For the borrower, the study is where cost, value and the opening timeline are shown to hold together before the commitment rather than after it.

SBA full-service restaurant loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026
ProgramLoansDollarsLower quartileMedian loanUpper quartileCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)Charged off within 5 years
SBA 7(a)28,716$14.04 billion$74,000$246,000$575,00012.5%6.7%3.9%
SBA 5043,515$2.87 billion$346,500$606,000$1.1 million13.2%0.94%0.44%

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA full-service restaurant loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-programs.

SBA full-service restaurant loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals
Loan sizeSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
$150,000 or less11,944$828.4 million141withheld
Over $150,000 to $350,0006,194$1.62 billion754$190.9 million
Over $350,000 to $1 million6,778$4.18 billion1,661$1.02 billion
Over $1 million to $2 million2,511$3.58 billion735$1.01 billion
Over $2 million to $5 million1,289$3.82 billion223$633.5 million
Over $5 million0$01fewer than 5 loans

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA full-service restaurant loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals", https://www.analytics.loan/restaurant-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-size-bands.

Back to the contents

Questions buyers ask

Who prepares a feasibility study for a full-service restaurant loan?

An independent consultant with no stake in whether the restaurant opens. Loan Analytics prepares the study for the lender's credit file, whether that lender uses SBA 7(a) or 504, holds a USDA Business and Industry guarantee or lends conventionally, and Daniel Smith, MAI signs it. The study weighs the subject against this page's record and the rows for its state, metro and lender, then tests covers, check average, cost and coverage before a signed conclusion.

Does the SBA require a feasibility study for a restaurant loan?

Not in every case. Under the SOP passage that this site's 2026 fee survey reproduces, SBA may call for one when it needs a closer look at the type of restaurant and the market where it would open, and market saturation by industry type and location heads its list of circumstances. For a restaurant that is the natural question, since the class is lent to at volume, 3,574 7(a) approvals in FY2025. Lenders may also order one under their own policies.

How much does a restaurant feasibility study cost?

Restaurants are named in the opening tier of 'SBA Feasibility Study Cost in 2026', which is this site's 2026 fee survey of published provider prices: single-site SBA studies of standard special-purpose assets, at a published $5,000 to $12,500. Several sites, a concept without precedent or phased construction lift a study into a complex tier priced at $10,000 to $25,000, and studies built to 7 CFR Part 5001 for USDA cost $7,500 to $18,750 or more; SBA itself sets no fee. Our own fee comes back with the scope reply.

How long does a restaurant feasibility study take?

That turns on the scope, and we fix the schedule at the same time as the scope. Per the same survey, what stretches a study is more sites, new construction with a budget review and a ramp from completion, a franchise brand to be tested against its system's results, a USDA overlay, and rural markets so thin that competitors must be visited in person. Buying a restaurant with years of trading statements takes a shorter study than building one with no history. Name your lender's date when you request scope, and the timeline is set against it.

What will my lender check in a full-service restaurant feasibility study?

Demand it can believe, cost it can verify and coverage that survives a slow year: covers by daypart and the average check against dining rooms of the same concept and price; the build-out of kitchen, hood, bar and dining room plus opening expense and working capital to break-even; debt service tested at sales under the forecast, with current food and labor costs. The record explains the weight: a 6.7% charge-off floor on FY2017 to FY2021 7(a) restaurant loans, and no fewer than 12.5% of FY2017 to FY2024 7(a) approvals never funded.

What size SBA loan does a sit-down restaurant usually get?

Under 7(a) the median full-service restaurant loan is $246,000, with quartiles of $74,000 and $575,000; under 504 the median is $606,000, with quartiles of $346,500 and $1.1 million. Place moves those numbers far: state medians run from $55,000 in Hawaii to $459,000 in Georgia, and metro medians from $50,000 in Toledo and other Ohio metros to $700,000 in Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach.

Should a restaurant project use SBA 7(a) or 504?

Restaurant borrowers have chosen 7(a) far more often: 28,716 loans against 3,515 under 504 in FY2017 to FY2026. 504 loans run larger, a $606,000 median against $246,000, and their charge-off floor is far lower, 0.94% against 6.7%, though they are cancelled slightly more often, 13.2% against 12.5%. This page describes 504 restaurant loans as property-backed, so the choice turns on what the project buys and what the lender offers. Either way the study is written to the program, and for 504 the real estate gets its own valuation section.

How often do SBA restaurant loans end in a charge-off?

For 7(a) restaurant loans funded between FY2017 and FY2021, the floor is 3.9% within 5 years and 6.7% to date; for 504 it is 0.44% and 0.94%. Each is a minimum, since loans still repaying can yet be charged off. Across states the printed floors span 0.00% in New Mexico to 11.7% in Vermont, and across metros 0.00% in Colorado Springs to 15.5% in Akron.

Which states have the most SBA restaurant lending?

California, with 4,184 loans and $2.50 billion in FY2017 to FY2026. New York is second by count at 2,192 loans, Texas second by dollars at $1.52 billion, and Florida third by dollars with $1.43 billion. Outside the states, the District of Columbia has 115 loans for $76.6 million and Puerto Rico 302 for $58.5 million. The thinnest state records are Wyoming's 37 loans for $20.1 million and Alaska's 54, too few in Wyoming's case to print either floor.

Which banks make the most SBA restaurant loans?

The Huntington National Bank, with 3,167 loans for $850.1 million in FY2017 to FY2026. Next by count are Newtek Bank, National Association with 960, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company with 893, TD Bank, National Association with 867 and U.S. Bank, National Association with 839. By dollars, Bank of Hope ranks third with $314.3 million on 647 loans, after the two leaders by count. Development corporations rank high too, among them Granite State Economic Development Corporation (192 loans) and Empire State Certified Development Corporation (172). Lenders under 5 restaurant loans are left off the table.

Why are restaurant loans in Ohio so much smaller than in Georgia?

The tables show the gap without explaining it. Ohio's median is $85,000 and Georgia's $459,000; Ohio's 1,602 loans total $429.1 million, Georgia's 1,169 total $829.0 million. A small median can reflect leased dining rooms, equipment and working capital loans or purchases of existing restaurants; a large one can reflect land, a building and a ground-up kitchen. The study establishes which format the subject's trade area actually finances before using either state's figures. Loss floors are close: 6.1% in Ohio, 5.7% in Georgia.

Has SBA restaurant lending recovered since the pandemic?

In dollars, fully; in count, not to its old peak. 7(a) approvals fell to 1,932 in FY2021, the fewest since FY2000, then rose to 3,574 loans and $1.78 billion in FY2025, a dollar total no earlier year reached. The count remains below FY2007's 5,033, and FY2026 eased to 2,797. The newest loans carry no measured loss rate yet, because the charge-off cohort ends with loans funded in FY2021, so a lender approving into this market wants the study to show the trade area can absorb another dining room.

Is the study different if I am buying an existing restaurant?

Yes, because the evidence is different. For a purchase, the seller's documented sales, covers and costs are the starting evidence, tested against today's trade area. This site's 2026 fee survey reports that SBA's SOP calls for a valuation of the business, done independently, on a change of ownership where financing above the appraised real estate and equipment tops $250,000, or on a sale between related parties, at published prices of $1,800 to $7,000; SOP 50 10 8.1 also brings in a quality of earnings report for purchase prices of $3 million or more, at $10,000 to $30,000. Neither replaces the feasibility study.

Does a franchised restaurant need a different study?

This class counts sit-down restaurants by industry code whether independent or franchised, so the tables give no separate franchise figures. Loan Analytics' 2026 fee survey notes that a franchise adds a comparison of the brand's results across its system with the site's projection, and that the brand must appear on SBA's reinstated Franchise Directory before the loan proceeds. Our study then tests franchise fees in the budget, the protected territory against competing units nearby, and projected covers against the brand's comparable dining rooms.

Can the same study serve a USDA B&I or conventional restaurant lender?

Yes. Loan Analytics writes restaurant studies for SBA, USDA Business and Industry and conventional lenders alike. The same 2026 fee survey gives USDA studies their own band, $7,500 to $18,750 or more, because they follow the components and factors of 7 CFR Part 5001, and notes USDA's requirement of a study when a B&I loan over $1 million goes to a new business. The tables here hold SBA approvals only, so for other lenders they serve as context and the local evidence comes from fieldwork.

What does 'withheld' or 'not reported' mean in a restaurant row?

'Not reported' marks a rate whose cohort has fewer than 30 loans: Wyoming prints neither floor, and Newtek Bank, National Association none despite 960 loans. 'Withheld' is a value this page leaves unprinted, such as the floors of Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler and Readycap Lending, LLC, or the dollars of 504 loans at $150,000 or less. Neither is zero, and a study should never put a number on either. A printed 0.00%, as for New Mexico or Colorado Springs, is a measured floor and still a minimum.

Do bars and fast-food restaurants count in these restaurant figures?

No. Restaurants enter this class through the borrower's industry code for full-service dining, so table-service dining rooms are in, independent or chain, and quick-service units, caterers and bars without full food service are counted on other pages. A concept that straddles the line, such as a brewpub with a full kitchen, should be checked against the code SBA recorded, and its comparable set built from the concept rather than the label.

Back to the contents

Loan Analytics prepares the feasibility study a lender reads before it commits: for a full-service restaurant project anywhere in the United States, financed under SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry or a conventional bank loan. Tell us the project and the lender's deadline, and we reply with scope, timeline and fee.

Request Scope & Timeline

Start with the data.

Contact Us