Grocery Store Feasibility Study

The SBA loan record for grocery store projects nationally and by state, and what a feasibility study for one has to test.

Grocery store feasibility study consultant

Loan Analytics works as a grocery store feasibility study consultant for independent grocers, for buyers of an operating store and for owners opening a new one, whenever the lender wants an outside study in its credit file before it commits. The SBA's own loan record shows what that lender has already financed. From FY2017 to FY2026 the agency approved 3,701 SBA 7(a) loans to grocery store projects for $2.75 billion (median $310,000) and 488 under SBA 504 for $631.7 million (median $846,000). California (749 loans, $688.7 million) and New York (551 loans, $497.9 million) stand far ahead of every other state, and the median grocery loan runs from $100,000 in Ohio, Massachusetts and Connecticut to $763,000 in Utah. A credit officer who reads grocery requests knows how wide that range is and will place yours somewhere inside it.

The same record shows where grocery credit breaks, and a Loan Analytics study is scoped around those points. On the FY2017 to FY2021 cohort the 7(a) charge-off floor for grocery stores is 7.6%, and 3.8% of 7(a) grocery loans were charged off within their first five years; 504 shows 0.00% on both measures. Before any money moved, at least 12.5% of 7(a) approvals and 13.3% of 504 approvals were cancelled. The study therefore has to prove two things to the lender: that the store's sales, after department margins, shrink, payroll and occupancy, carry the debt service with room to absorb a new competitor, and that the purchase or build can close at the cost and value the approval assumed, with refrigeration, cases and opening stock in the budget.

We write every grocery study with its reader in mind, the credit officer holding the file. A 7(a) request near the $310,000 median that buys an operating store calls for a different file from a 504 project at the $1.6 million upper quartile that builds or buys the box, and both differ from a request in the New York-Newark-Jersey City metro, where 559 grocery loans carry a charge-off floor of 14.1%, or from one going to a lender whose own grocery book shows a high floor. We set the scope by program, lender and market, and Daniel Smith, MAI signs the study.

Request Scope & Timeline

Grocery lending runs on 7(a)

Grocery stores took 3,701 loans through 7(a) in fiscal 2017 to 2026, totaling $2.75 billion at a median of $310,000, and 488 SBA 504 loans worth $631.7 million at a median of $846,000. The larger 504 median is the building: a store that owns its box or its pad. The 7(a) loans are more likely to fund the acquisition of an existing store with its inventory and equipment, or working capital for one. Annual 7(a) dollars peaked at $407.4 million in FY2021.

Thin margins show in the 7(a) floor

Grocery's 7(a) charge-off floor is 7.6% on the cohort that funded from FY2017 to FY2021, while 504 shows 0.00% for the same years. Grocery is a volume business with thin margins, and when sales slip a store has little room to keep paying; the 7(a) floor is what that looks like in a loan record. Cancellation after approval is 12.5% for 7(a) and 13.3% for 504.

California leads with 749 loans and $688.7 million, but the next state is unusual: New York, with 551 loans and $497.9 million, well ahead of Florida's 187 loans and Texas's 182. Michigan matches Florida at 187 loans, with $168.9 million. Ohio's 177 loans total only $66.9 million, which suggests smaller stores there. The table closes with Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Tennessee, each at 27 loans.

Trade area, margin and shrink

A grocery feasibility study has to define the trade area and the households in it, then measure the share of their food spending the store can capture against the supermarkets, discount grocers, dollar stores and ethnic markets already present. It must model sales per square foot, gross margin by department and shrink on perishables, since a small error in margin can erase cash flow. Cost should include refrigeration, freezer cases, a backup generator and the opening inventory itself. Debt service coverage has to hold up when a new competitor opens nearby, a risk every independent grocer faces. The appraisal must separate the real estate from the equipment and inventory, and test whether the building would lease to another retailer.

Grocers are classed by the borrower's industry code, so a convenience store or a fuel station with a market is counted in another class. Chains and independents that finance without an SBA guarantee are not part of the record.

SBA loan record for grocery store, United States, FY2017 to FY2026

ProgramLoansDollarsMedian loanCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
SBA 7(a) 3,701$2.75 billion $310,000 12.5% 7.6%
SBA 504 488$631.7 million $846,000 13.3% 0.00%

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for grocery store, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#record-C40.

Cancellation counts FY2017 to FY2024 approvals; charge-off counts FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans to date. Both are floors, and a rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort.

SBA 7(a) grocery store loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

0100200300400500FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 412Loans, FY2018: 373Loans, FY2019: 299Loans, FY2020: 288Loans, FY2021: 397Loans, FY2022: 324Loans, FY2023: 429Loans, FY2024: 393Loans, FY2025: 429Loans, FY2026: 357
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY2017412$242.5 million
FY2018373$255.4 million
FY2019299$167.4 million
FY2020288$206.0 million
FY2021397$407.4 million
FY2022324$248.3 million
FY2023429$285.6 million
FY2024393$253.8 million
FY2025429$353.4 million
FY2026357$325.9 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for grocery store, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#record-C40.

SBA 504 grocery store loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

020406080FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 41Loans, FY2018: 28Loans, FY2019: 39Loans, FY2020: 46Loans, FY2021: 72Loans, FY2022: 62Loans, FY2023: 49Loans, FY2024: 53Loans, FY2025: 52Loans, FY2026: 46
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY201741$46.0 million
FY201828$29.0 million
FY201939$51.9 million
FY202046$47.8 million
FY202172$82.1 million
FY202262$90.6 million
FY202349$64.6 million
FY202453$59.6 million
FY202552$76.8 million
FY202646$83.3 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for grocery store, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#record-C40.

States and other areas with the most grocery store loans

State or areaLoansDollars
California749$688.7 million
New York551$497.9 million
Florida187$239.6 million
Michigan187$168.9 million
Texas182$221.6 million
Ohio177$66.9 million
Illinois174$161.3 million
New Jersey164$121.5 million
Washington157$131.0 million
Pennsylvania153$93.1 million
Massachusetts144$49.4 million
Georgia118$137.0 million
Puerto Rico100$19.1 million
Wisconsin97$74.4 million
Minnesota87$49.7 million
Connecticut67$27.6 million
Oregon62$60.1 million
Virginia58$32.3 million
North Carolina55$50.1 million
Maryland50$24.0 million
Missouri46$34.0 million
Iowa40$13.5 million
Utah39$47.7 million
Maine35$22.6 million
Idaho34$23.3 million
Indiana33$15.1 million
Rhode Island31$13.7 million
Colorado30$23.1 million
New Hampshire28$8.3 million
Arizona27$28.2 million
Louisiana27$22.3 million
Oklahoma27$15.7 million
Tennessee27$23.9 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for grocery store, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#record-C40.

Grocery store feasibility study data by state

Grocery store feasibility study data by metro area

Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30.

SBA lending to grocery store projects, FY1991 to FY2026

Every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan approved for a grocery store project since FY1991, by fiscal year, nationally.

What the early years can and cannot show

The grocery series cannot be read back to FY1991. In the early years too many loans in SBA's files carry no usable industry code, so FY1991 to FY1996 are not measured, FY1997 shows 1 loan under 7(a) with its dollars suppressed, and FY1998 shows 49 7(a) loans with their dollars withheld, beside 9 loans under 504 for $3.5 million. Read under the table's note, those counts may be floors set by coding, and they say little about how much grocery lending took place. FY1999 is the first year with every cell printed for both programs: 487 7(a) loans for $127.3 million and 49 504 loans for $21.0 million. A study that places a project in the long history of the class should start its comparison there and say why.

The mid-2000s peak in loan count

7(a) grocery lending reached its highest counts in the middle of the 2000s: 817 loans in FY2004, 1,015 in FY2005, 988 in FY2006 and 939 in FY2007. Those were small loans by the measure of recent years. FY2005's 1,015 approvals carried $209.0 million, while FY2021's 397 approvals carried $407.4 million, the largest 7(a) dollar total in the series. The years since confirm the shift rather than reverse it: FY2025's 429 loans carried $353.4 million and FY2026's 357 carried $325.9 million, each well above the dollars of any year in the mid-2000s peak. A lender reading a grocery study now is used to fewer and larger requests, and it will expect the market evidence to match the size of the loan.

FY2008 to FY2010: 7(a) fell, 504 held

After FY2007 the 7(a) side dropped hard, from 939 loans that year to 569 in FY2008 and 333 in FY2009, with dollars falling from $193.2 million to $148.9 million and then $111.9 million. The 504 side barely moved: 77 grocery loans in FY2007, 75 in FY2008, 74 in FY2009 and 74 again in FY2010, while its dollars rose from $45.3 million in FY2008 to $58.8 million and then $60.3 million. The loans that mostly buy and run stores contracted; the loans that mostly finance the building did not. For a feasibility study the lesson concerns the exit. A plan that depends on refinancing the store, or on selling it to a buyer who will need a 7(a) loan, rests on a source of credit that has shrunk fast once before, and the study's value and exit tests should not lean on it.

The recovery and the FY2021 record

The 7(a) count came back unevenly. FY2011 brought 430 loans and $247.0 million, more dollars than any year of the mid-2000s, and from FY2012 to FY2016 the count ranged from 364 to 457 a year, with dollars peaking at $298.8 million in FY2015. The low of the recent decade came next: 299 loans in FY2019, then 288 in FY2020, the fewest of any year since FY1998. FY2021 then set the dollar record at $407.4 million on 397 loans, and 504 rose with it to 72 loans and $82.1 million. The FY2017 to FY2021 cohort behind this page's charge-off floors therefore mixes the thinnest years of the period with its largest dollar year, and a lender who compares a new grocery loan to that cohort is comparing it to an uneven vintage.

504 since FY2016

504 grocery lending went through its own trough in the middle of the last decade: 32 loans for $31.2 million in FY2016, then 28 for $29.0 million in FY2018, the fewest of any year after FY1998. It then moved to a higher level. FY2022 set the 504 dollar record, $90.6 million on 62 loans, and FY2026 ranks second, $83.3 million on 46 loans. FY2006 still holds the 504 count record, 95 loans, but they carried only $60.4 million. The 504 grocery project of FY2026 is a bigger undertaking than the one of FY2006, and a study for one has to show the land, building, equipment and case costs that support its size, and a value that covers them.

The full record against the last decade

Across all measured years SBA approved 13,595 7(a) grocery loans for $6.10 billion and 1,624 504 loans for $1.42 billion. Of those, FY2017 to FY2026 accounts for 3,701 7(a) loans and 488 504 loans, yet $2.75 billion and $631.7 million of the dollars: a far larger part of the money than of the loans. That is the change a credit officer carries into the review. A study that benchmarks a project against grocery deals of the early 2000s will make the request look large; set against the FY2017 to FY2026 medians, quartiles and floors in the sections below, it is placed where the lender's own experience sits.

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to grocery store projects by fiscal year
Fiscal yearSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
FY1991not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1992not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1993not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1994not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1995not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1996not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY19971fewer than 5 loansnot measurednot measured
FY199849withheld9$3.5 million
FY1999487$127.3 million49$21.0 million
FY2000386$106.6 million34$14.5 million
FY2001439$127.2 million42$24.7 million
FY2002516$154.7 million59$34.1 million
FY2003543$115.5 million63$35.6 million
FY2004817$177.7 million74$36.1 million
FY20051,015$209.0 million75$44.2 million
FY2006988$203.0 million95$60.4 million
FY2007939$193.2 million77$51.5 million
FY2008569$148.9 million75$45.3 million
FY2009333$111.9 million74$58.8 million
FY2010340$141.5 million74$60.3 million
FY2011430$247.0 million68$61.1 million
FY2012374$205.9 million77$61.9 million
FY2013364$203.2 million60$43.6 million
FY2014415$281.5 million51$47.0 million
FY2015457$298.8 million48$51.6 million
FY2016432$289.0 million32$31.2 million
FY2017412$242.5 million41$46.0 million
FY2018373$255.4 million28$29.0 million
FY2019299$167.4 million39$51.9 million
FY2020288$206.0 million46$47.8 million
FY2021397$407.4 million72$82.1 million
FY2022324$248.3 million62$90.6 million
FY2023429$285.6 million49$64.6 million
FY2024393$253.8 million53$59.6 million
FY2025429$353.4 million52$76.8 million
FY2026357$325.9 million46$83.3 million
FY1991 to FY202613,595$6.10 billion1,624$1.42 billion
FY2017 to FY20263,701$2.75 billion488$631.7 million

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. A class figure counts the loans whose NAICS code places them in the class; in years when SBA's files leave the code missing or unplaceable for more than one loan in a hundred, the figure is a floor, and where too few loans are coded the year is not measured. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to grocery store projects by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#sba-record-sba-by-year.

Back to the contents

Every state ranked for grocery store lending

SBA loans to grocery store projects in each state from FY2017 to FY2026, ranked, with loan size, program split and the cohort floors where at least 30 loans support them.

California and New York set the scale

California's 749 grocery loans for $688.7 million and New York's 551 for $497.9 million lead the table by a distance: each records more grocery loans than Florida and Michigan, the next pair at 187, put together. The leaders lend in different ways. California's median loan is $581,000 and 112 of its loans went through 504, the most of any state; New York's median is $352,000 and 524 of its 551 loans went through 7(a), with 27 under 504. New York's record is also harder: its cancellation floor is 20.0% and its charge-off floor 12.8%, against 10.8% and 4.5% in California. A study for a New York store goes to a lender that has seen many approved grocery loans fall away before funding and a high floor of losses after it, and the cost, equity and coverage tests have to be built for that reader.

Equal counts, unequal stores

Loan counts conceal the size of the store. Florida and Michigan both record 187 grocery loans, but Florida's total is $239.6 million at a median of $720,000 and Michigan's is $168.9 million at $315,000. Texas, with 182 loans, totals $221.6 million at a $625,000 median, while Ohio's 177 come to $66.9 million at $100,000. Massachusetts (144 loans, $49.4 million) and Connecticut (67 loans, $27.6 million) share Ohio's $100,000 median, and Maryland's is $110,000. In those low-median states a request that buys a building or opens a new store sits far above the usual grocery file, and a lender will ask the study to justify why this project needs so much more than the state's grocers have typically borrowed.

Where the median loan is largest

At the high end, Utah's 39 loans carry the largest median in the table, $763,000, then Georgia at $733,500, Florida at $720,000, Arizona at $699,000 and Texas at $625,000. Georgia's 118 loans total $137.0 million, more than Washington's 157 loans at $131.0 million or Pennsylvania's 153 at $93.1 million. Medians this large suggest stores bought or built with their real estate, and in those states the study's weight moves toward the construction or purchase budget, the appraisal and the capacity of the trade area to support a full-size store; a sales model alone will not carry a loan of that size through credit.

Charge-off floors, state by state

Among the states with enough loans for a charge-off floor, Illinois is highest at 13.2%, followed by New Jersey at 12.9%, New York at 12.8%, Texas at 10.9% and Virginia at 10.0%; Massachusetts (9.3%), Ohio (9.2%) and Pennsylvania (8.6%) come next. At the low end, Florida and Minnesota show 0.00%, Wisconsin 2.0%, Georgia 2.3%, Washington 3.2%, Oregon 3.3% and Michigan 3.7%. Program mix does not explain the split on its own. Florida, Minnesota and Wisconsin lean on 504 more than most, with 37, 19 and 24 504 loans, but Michigan (176 of 187 under 7(a)) and Washington (144 of 157) are as 7(a)-heavy as Illinois (154 of 174) and still carry low floors. Place matters, and that is why the study builds its downside case on the local trade area and its competitors rather than on a national loss rate.

Cancellation: from Maryland to Ohio

Cancellation floors count approvals that never funded. Maryland's 21.1% is the highest in the table and New York's 20.0% is next, followed by New Jersey and Utah at 16.7% and Texas at 16.3%. Ohio's 2.2% is the lowest, then North Carolina at 5.0%, Iowa at 5.7% and Connecticut at 6.4%. Ohio pairs the lowest cancellation floor with a 9.2% charge-off floor: its grocery loans close, and some of them later fail. Maryland and New York carry their risk earlier, between approval and funding, which is where a study's cost budget, appraisal support and equity source are tested. A buyer in those states should expect the lender to read those sections first.

Where the table runs thin

From Maine (35 loans) to Tennessee (27), the table prints loans, dollars and a median but no rate, since none of their cohorts reaches 30 loans. From Kansas and Nebraska (22 loans each) down to Wyoming (5 loans), it prints only loans and dollars. New Mexico (4 loans) and West Virginia (2 loans) keep their counts, but their dollar cells read fewer than five loans, because the table leaves out a total that so few loans would expose. Dollars still separate these states: Montana's 21 loans total $22.9 million, close to Colorado's $23.1 million on 30 loans, while Kentucky's 16 total $4.3 million and Wyoming's 5 total $8.4 million. Puerto Rico, listed in the page's original state table, has 100 loans for $19.1 million. A study in any of these places cannot borrow a state rate, so it argues from the trade area and the store, cites the national floors as national, and says so plainly.

SBA grocery store loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026
StateLoansDollarsMedian loanSBA 7(a) loansSBA 504 loansCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
California749$688.7 million$581,00063711210.8%4.5%
New York551$497.9 million$352,0005242720.0%12.8%
Florida187$239.6 million$720,0001503713.4%0.00%
Michigan187$168.9 million$315,0001761113.8%3.7%
Texas182$221.6 million$625,0001701216.3%10.9%
Ohio177$66.9 million$100,00016982.2%9.2%
Illinois174$161.3 million$460,0001542012.9%13.2%
New Jersey164$121.5 million$324,5001531116.7%12.9%
Washington157$131.0 million$463,000144138.5%3.2%
Pennsylvania153$93.1 million$246,500143109.5%8.6%
Massachusetts144$49.4 million$100,000124207.1%9.3%
Georgia118$137.0 million$733,5001001814.0%2.3%
Wisconsin97$74.4 million$492,000732410.7%2.0%
Minnesota87$49.7 million$230,000681912.0%0.00%
Connecticut67$27.6 million$100,0006346.4%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Oregon62$60.1 million$477,50058413.2%3.3%
Virginia58$32.3 million$305,00053512.2%10.0%
North Carolina55$50.1 million$540,0005055.0%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Maryland50$24.0 million$110,00048221.1%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Missouri46$34.0 million$571,6003887.3%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Iowa40$13.5 million$150,0003195.7%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Utah39$47.7 million$763,000291016.7%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Maine35$22.6 million$228,000296not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Idaho34$23.3 million$425,100277not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Indiana33$15.1 million$207,000294not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Rhode Island31$13.7 million$187,000274not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Colorado30$23.1 million$332,750291not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
New Hampshire28$8.3 million$150,000244not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Arizona27$28.2 million$699,000207not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Louisiana27$22.3 million$411,300261not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Oklahoma27$15.7 million$226,300243not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Tennessee27$23.9 million$310,600234not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Kansas22$17.0 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Nebraska22$7.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Montana21$22.9 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Nevada21$18.9 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Vermont21$10.4 milliontoo few loans for these measures
South Carolina20$14.7 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Alabama17$17.0 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Kentucky16$4.3 milliontoo few loans for these measures
North Dakota12$11.1 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Delaware9$7.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Mississippi9$6.3 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Alaska8$5.1 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Hawaii8$2.1 milliontoo few loans for these measures
South Dakota8$6.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Arkansas6$2.1 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Wyoming5$8.4 milliontoo few loans for these measures
New Mexico4fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
West Virginia2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA grocery store loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#states-states.

Back to the contents

Metro areas ranked for grocery store lending

The metropolitan and micropolitan areas with a grocery store loan record, ranked by SBA loans.

New York-Newark-Jersey City

The New York-Newark-Jersey City metro is the largest grocery lending market in the metro table: 559 loans for $534.4 million at a median of $445,000, more loans than any state except California. Its charge-off floor of 14.1% is the highest of the metro floors the table prints. Its median also sits above the medians of both states it draws on most, New York's $352,000 and New Jersey's $324,500, which suggests the larger grocery loans in those states sit inside the metro. A study for a store in the metro is compared with a deep book of loans and a high measured loss rate, so its downside case has to show coverage after a competitor opens nearby and after a year of weaker margin, not only at stabilization.

California's metros

California places more metros in the table than any other state: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim (269 loans, $206.0 million), San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont (149, $136.3 million), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (50, $46.8 million), Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom (42, $39.7 million) and San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad (37, $39.4 million). Los Angeles has the lowest median of the group, $475,000, against $680,000 in San Francisco, $673,000 in Sacramento, $670,000 in San Diego and $625,000 in Riverside, and it is the only California metro with a printed charge-off floor, 6.2%. San Francisco's floor reads withheld, and a withheld floor tells the reader nothing about whether those loans were clean. A Los Angeles study is read against many smaller files with a measured loss rate; a San Francisco study against fewer, larger loans, where the study has to supply the risk evidence the table does not.

Metros of small grocery loans

Several metros lend in small amounts. Columbus has 53 grocery loans at a median of $50,000, the lowest in the table, for $17.9 million in all; Boston-Cambridge-Newton has 116 at $100,000 for $28.1 million; Cleveland 39 at $100,000 for $14.3 million; Washington-Arlington-Alexandria 70 at $117,500; San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas 62 at $135,000; and Providence-Warwick 38 at $181,000. Boston's 116 loans carry less money than Atlanta's 81 ($88.1 million) or Seattle's 70 ($67.9 million), and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria matches Seattle's 70 loans with $28.4 million. A credit officer in these metros mostly sees small grocery credits, so a large project stands out; the study has to carry it with the store's own sales, margin and cost evidence, because the metro's pattern will not.

Metros of large grocery loans

The largest medians belong to Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford at $1.6 million, Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos at $950,400, Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia at $818,100 and Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell at $775,000. Orlando, Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Charlotte and Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood all record 27 loans, yet Orlando's total is $50.3 million against $25.8 million in Tampa, $27.2 million in Charlotte and $26.5 million in Grand Rapids. Austin's 30 loans total $51.9 million. At these sizes the loan underwrites real estate and a full fit-out as much as a business, so the construction or purchase budget, the appraisal and the growth of households in the trade area carry as much weight as the sales forecast.

Where the metro floor is missing

Only the New York (14.1%), Chicago-Naperville-Elgin (10.3%) and Los Angeles (6.2%) rows print a charge-off floor. Every other metro row shows a withheld floor, or a not-reported one for a cohort below 30 loans, and neither means the metro has no losses. Chicago's 10.3% sits below the Illinois state floor of 13.2%, so a Chicago study should quote both. For a store in Detroit-Warren-Dearborn (95 loans, $95.4 million, median $397,000) or Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington (107 loans, $57.9 million, median $240,000), the nearest measured rate is the state's, Michigan's 3.7% or Pennsylvania's 8.6%, and the study should name the rate it uses and why. For Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington (67 loans, median $275,000) it is Minnesota's 0.00%, a floor that a careful study will not present as proof that grocery loans there do not fail.

Splits inside the large states

State medians hide the metro splits. In Texas, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington (63 loans, $64.2 million) has a median of $585,500, Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands (40 loans, $49.7 million) $350,000 and Austin $950,400. In Florida, Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach has 66 loans at $387,500, below Tampa's $525,000 and far below Orlando. In Ohio, Columbus sits at $50,000 and Cleveland at $100,000; in Pennsylvania, Philadelphia at $240,000 and Pittsburgh at $233,300; in Wisconsin, Milwaukee-Waukesha at $390,000 on 32 loans. The study benchmarks against the metro row wherever one exists and falls back to the state only where the metro is absent, because a lender in Houston will not accept a comparison built on loans made in Austin.

SBA grocery store loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026
Metro or micro areaLoansDollarsMedian loanCharged off (floor)
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ Metro Area559$534.4 million$445,00014.1%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metro Area269$206.0 million$475,0006.2%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metro Area149$136.3 million$680,000withheld
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN Metro Area142$137.3 million$484,90010.3%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Metro Area116$28.1 million$100,000withheld
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metro Area107$57.9 million$240,000withheld
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metro Area95$95.4 million$397,000withheld
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA Metro Area81$88.1 million$775,000withheld
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metro Area70$67.9 million$612,050withheld
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Area70$28.4 million$117,500not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metro Area67$44.2 million$275,000withheld
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL Metro Area66$61.2 million$387,500withheld
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Area63$64.2 million$585,500withheld
San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas, PR Metro Area62$14.3 million$135,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Columbus, OH Metro Area53$17.9 million$50,000withheld
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metro Area50$46.8 million$625,000withheld
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA Metro Area42$39.7 million$673,000withheld
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX Metro Area40$49.7 million$350,000withheld
Cleveland, OH Metro Area39$14.3 million$100,000withheld
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA Metro Area38$16.2 million$181,000withheld
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA Metro Area37$39.4 million$670,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI Metro Area32$21.2 million$390,000withheld
Pittsburgh, PA Metro Area32$27.3 million$233,300withheld
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metro Area30$51.9 million$950,400withheld
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Metro Area29$22.6 million$390,000withheld
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Metro Area27$27.2 million$818,100withheld
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI Metro Area27$26.5 million$189,000withheld
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL Metro Area27$50.3 million$1.6 millionwithheld
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metro Area27$25.8 million$525,000withheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA grocery store loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#metros-metros.

Back to the contents

SBA lenders to grocery store projects

The lenders with a recorded book of grocery store loans, ranked; no lender with fewer than 5 loans is listed.

The largest books by count

The Huntington National Bank leads the grocery lender table with 241 loans for $92.4 million. TD Bank, National Association is second with 181 loans for $33.3 million, and U.S. Bank, National Association third with 125 for $75.5 million. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company ties Bank of Hope at 119 loans, yet its book totals $13.7 million against Bank of Hope's $123.9 million. The same count can describe a book of large loans or a book of small ones, and the difference tells a borrower which kind of grocery file the bank is used to reading. A study sent to a small-loan grocery lender with a large request has to explain the size; one sent to a large-loan lender has to meet the depth that lender expects.

The largest books by dollars

Ranked by dollars, NewBank leads with $166.5 million on 107 loans, then Metro City Bank with $139.9 million on 81 and Bank of Hope with $123.9 million on 119; The Huntington National Bank is fourth at $92.4 million despite the most loans. Readycap Lending, LLC ($86.0 million on 69), Byline Bank ($76.0 million on 54), Commonwealth Business Bank ($62.3 million on 51), Hanmi Bank ($59.2 million on 54) and PCB Bank ($41.3 million on 40) also lend large for their counts. Florida First Capital Finance Corporation, Inc. shows the pattern at its sharpest: 27 loans for $63.8 million, more dollars than TD Bank, National Association's 181 loans. The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation records 34 loans for $47.0 million. A study headed to one of these lenders is read as a large-loan credit, with the cost budget, the appraisal and the sales forecast examined line by line.

The small-ticket books

Other lenders carry many grocery loans for little money. TD Bank, National Association's 181 loans total $33.3 million, and the 119 of Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company total $13.7 million. Northeast Bank (ME) has 77 for $16.3 million, Eastern Bank 56 for $7.6 million, Santander Bank, National Association 48 for $9.5 million, BayFirst National Bank 46 for $10.7 million, Lendistry SBLC, LLC 26 for $6.7 million and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico 40 for $5.3 million. These books sit alongside the low medians elsewhere on the page, Columbus's $50,000 and the $100,000 of Boston, Ohio, Massachusetts and Connecticut, though the tables do not say where each lender's loans are. A small grocery loan is still a credit decision; a study at this size can be shorter, but it still has to show the store's margin covering the payment after shrink.

Lender loss floors

Only TD Bank, National Association (24.4%), NewBank (14.0%), The Huntington National Bank (9.4%) and Bank of Hope (8.1%) have a printed charge-off floor on grocery loans. TD Bank, National Association's 24.4% is the highest rate anywhere on this page, above every state and metro floor, and it rests on a book of small loans. NewBank's 14.0% rests on the largest dollar book in the table. For the rest of the table the floor reads withheld, or not reported where the lender's grocery cohort is too small to rate, and a grocery buyer should read neither as a clean record. A borrower whose file goes to a lender with a high grocery floor should expect the credit officer to ask what makes this store different, and the study should answer before the question comes, with department margins, shrink and the sales a new competitor would take.

Familiar banks, modest grocery books

Wells Fargo Bank National Association records 72 grocery loans for $39.0 million, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association 64 for $25.3 million, KeyBank National Association 61 for $27.9 million, Fifth Third Bank and PNC Bank, National Association 41 each, for $40.1 million and $14.3 million, and Bank of America, National Association 28 for $16.0 million. None of them leads the table by count or by dollars, and none has a printed floor. Fifth Third Bank and PNC Bank, National Association show how far books of equal count can differ in size. A borrower who banks with one of them can ask for an SBA grocery loan there, but no bank's grocery book speaks to a particular trade area, so the market questions fall to the study.

Reading the lender table

The table lists Newtek Bank, National Association (63 loans, $25.2 million) and Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC (42 loans, $29.3 million) as separate lenders, and neither carries a printed floor because both cohorts are under 30 loans. Celtic Bank Corporation (41 loans, $38.7 million), Open Bank (45, $45.1 million), Columbia Bank (OR) (34, $13.0 million) and Woori America Bank (32, $29.0 million) fill out the middle. No lender with fewer than 5 grocery loans appears. For a buyer the table is a list of lenders that have closed SBA grocery loans since FY2017, with the size of loan each is used to; Loan Analytics writes the study so that whichever of them holds the file can set it against its own grocery book.

SBA lenders by grocery store loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026
LenderLoansDollarsCharged off (floor)
The Huntington National Bank241$92.4 million9.4%
TD Bank, National Association181$33.3 million24.4%
U.S. Bank, National Association125$75.5 millionwithheld
Bank of Hope119$123.9 million8.1%
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company119$13.7 millionwithheld
NewBank107$166.5 million14.0%
Metro City Bank81$139.9 millionwithheld
Northeast Bank (ME)77$16.3 millionwithheld
Wells Fargo Bank National Association72$39.0 millionwithheld
Readycap Lending, LLC69$86.0 millionwithheld
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association64$25.3 millionwithheld
Newtek Bank, National Association63$25.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
KeyBank National Association61$27.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Eastern Bank56$7.6 millionwithheld
Byline Bank54$76.0 millionwithheld
Hanmi Bank54$59.2 millionwithheld
Commonwealth Business Bank51$62.3 millionwithheld
Santander Bank, National Association48$9.5 millionwithheld
BayFirst National Bank46$10.7 millionwithheld
Open Bank45$45.1 millionwithheld
Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC42$29.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Celtic Bank Corporation41$38.7 millionwithheld
PNC Bank, National Association41$14.3 millionwithheld
Fifth Third Bank41$40.1 millionwithheld
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico40$5.3 millionwithheld
PCB Bank40$41.3 millionwithheld
The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation34$47.0 millionwithheld
Columbia Bank (OR)34$13.0 millionwithheld
Woori America Bank32$29.0 millionwithheld
Bank of America, National Association28$16.0 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Florida First Capital Finance Corporation, Inc.27$63.8 millionwithheld
Lendistry SBLC, LLC26$6.7 millionwithheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA lenders by grocery store loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#lenders-lenders.

Back to the contents

Loan sizes, program split and cohort floors for grocery store loans

How large grocery store loans run under each SBA program, how they fall into size bands, and how often they were cancelled or charged off.

How far apart the programs sit

The quartiles put 7(a) and 504 grocery loans in different size ranges. The 7(a) quartiles run $100,000, $310,000 and $972,000 from lower to upper; the 504 quartiles run $437,250, $846,000 and $1.6 million. So on grocery loans the bottom quartile point of 504 already tops the 7(a) midpoint, and the 504 midpoint stops a little below where the 7(a) upper quartile begins. Read that way, a 504 grocery file is a real estate credit with a store inside it, and a 7(a) file near the median is mostly the store itself: its equipment, its stock and the business. The study's depth follows the split, with cost and value carrying the first and sales and margin the second.

7(a): counts small, dollars large

The 7(a) size bands pull in opposite directions. Loans of $150,000 or less make up the most crowded 7(a) band, 1,370 of them, carrying the fewest dollars, $96.5 million. The band just under the top holds 383 loans and $1.24 billion, the most dollars of any 7(a) band, and the band beneath it 481 loans and $696.8 million. The top band itself shows 0 loans and $0. By count the 7(a) grocery book is a small-loan book; by dollars it is a large-loan book, and a lender's exposure, and with it the scrutiny of its credit committee, follows the dollars. A 7(a) grocery request in the upper bands joins the part of the book where the lender's money actually sits.

The middle of the 7(a) book

Between those ends, the band over $150,000 holds 633 loans for $164.4 million and the band over $350,000 holds 834 for $544.5 million, the second-largest count of any 7(a) band. The 7(a) median of $310,000 falls in the first of these and the upper quartile of $972,000 near the top of the second. At these sizes a lender looks hardest at whether the store's own cash flow carries the payment, so the sales, margin and shrink model does most of the work in the study, and the cost section matters mainly where the loan funds equipment or a remodel.

504: the building bands

504 grocery loans gather higher up. The band over $350,000 holds the most 504 loans, 180 for $114.6 million; the next band holds 121 for $169.4 million and the band just under the top 93 for $311.8 million, the most 504 dollars of any band. The smallest band has 20 loans with dollars withheld, and the top band 3 loans whose dollars are suppressed, since a total on fewer than 5 loans is not printed. Neither cell is given a number here, and neither should be read as small. A 504 grocery study is usually a study of a building and a site: purchase or construction cost, cases and refrigeration, and whether the box has a second life as retail space if the grocer leaves.

Cancellation and charge-off by program

The program table gives the floors side by side. 504 grocery approvals were cancelled at a floor of 13.3% and 7(a) approvals at 12.5%, so, floor against floor, the building loans fall through before funding slightly more often. On losses the order reverses: 7(a) shows a charge-off floor of 7.6% on the FY2017 to FY2021 cohort and 504 shows 0.00%. For 504 the risk this record shows is the closing; for 7(a) it is the years after. A 504 study earns its place by holding the project together to closing, with a cost budget, an appraisal and an equity source that agree. A 7(a) study earns it by showing the store keeps paying after it opens or changes hands.

Losses after year five

The 7(a) program row also shows 3.8% of grocery loans charged off within five years, below the 7.6% floor to date. Read together, the two measures say grocery losses do not all arrive while the loan is young, and a study that shows coverage only through stabilization answers part of the lender's question. The coverage test has to run into the later years of the term, against the risks that build with time in a grocery store: a new supermarket or discount grocer opening in the trade area, the renewal of the lease on the box, and the replacement of refrigeration and cases. On 504 both measures are 0.00%, and they are floors, so the study still tests the later years.

SBA grocery store loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026
ProgramLoansDollarsLower quartileMedian loanUpper quartileCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)Charged off within 5 years
SBA 7(a)3,701$2.75 billion$100,000$310,000$972,00012.5%7.6%3.8%
SBA 504488$631.7 million$437,250$846,000$1.6 million13.3%0.00%0.00%

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA grocery store loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-programs.

SBA grocery store loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals
Loan sizeSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
$150,000 or less1,370$96.5 million20withheld
Over $150,000 to $350,000633$164.4 million71$17.3 million
Over $350,000 to $1 million834$544.5 million180$114.6 million
Over $1 million to $2 million481$696.8 million121$169.4 million
Over $2 million to $5 million383$1.24 billion93$311.8 million
Over $5 million0$03fewer than 5 loans

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA grocery store loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals", https://www.analytics.loan/grocery-store-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-size-bands.

Back to the contents

Questions buyers ask

Who can prepare a grocery store feasibility study my lender will accept?

A consultant who is independent of the buyer, the seller and the contractor, so the credit officer can treat the report as evidence rather than as a sales document. Loan Analytics writes grocery store studies for 7(a) and 504 lenders, for banks seeking a USDA Business and Industry guarantee and for conventional loans, and Daniel Smith, MAI puts his signature on each grocery study. Every study measures the project against this page's SBA grocery record, which counts 3,701 7(a) loans and 488 504 loans for FY2017 to FY2026, and then against the state, metro and lender rows wherever those rows hold enough loans to carry a median or a floor.

Will my lender require a feasibility study before approving a grocery store loan?

Lenders decide that under their own credit policies and the facts of the deal, and the tables on this page do not record which loans had a study. What the record does show is why grocery requests get a close reading. The 7(a) grocery charge-off floor is 7.6% on the FY2017 to FY2021 cohort; the cancellation floors are 12.5% for 7(a) and 13.3% for 504; and the state charge-off floors reach 13.2% in Illinois, 12.9% in New Jersey and 12.8% in New York. A buyer who brings a study answers the lender's questions about sales, margin and cost before they are asked.

How much does a grocery store feasibility study cost?

Our 2026 fee survey of providers, posted on this site under the title SBA Feasibility Study Cost in 2026, is the source here. For a single site on a standard special-purpose asset, published provider fees run from $5,000 up to $12,500; complex projects, such as several sites under one concept or construction delivered in phases, run from $10,000 up to $25,000. The survey does not name grocery stores in either band, so the fee for a particular store follows its scope: the purchase of an operating store with its own history, a new store with none, or a request covering several stores. Loan Analytics prices each grocery study in its reply to the scope request, alongside the timeline.

What other reports will the lender order, and what do they cost?

Beside the study, a grocery file usually carries other third-party reports, and the same 2026 fee survey on this site records what providers publish for them. Appraisal fees are published at $2,500 to $7,500 for a routine assignment, rising to $15,000 when a going-concern special-purpose valuation is needed. Buying an operating store adds a business valuation, published at $1,800 to $7,000. Environmental work up to a Phase I, where the lender requires one, is published at $2,000 to $6,000, and title and survey come to $2,000 to $5,000. Closing guides from lenders, cited in the survey, put a typical SBA acquisition's third-party bill, before the guaranty fee, at $12,000 to $25,000. For a grocery store the study and the appraisal should agree on how value divides between the building and the cases, refrigeration and stock.

How long does a grocery store feasibility study take?

No turnaround appears anywhere on this page, and we do not promise one before seeing the project. The timeline comes back with the scope, set against the date your lender needs the report. What moves it for a grocery store is the fieldwork: how many competing supermarkets, discount grocers, dollar stores and specialty markets the trade area holds, since each is visited and placed; whether a building is being bought or built, which adds a cost and value review; and whether the store sits where the SBA grocery record is thin, from Kansas to West Virginia in the state table, so that fieldwork has to stand in for a state rate.

What does a grocery store feasibility study test?

It starts with the households the store can draw on, sets the trade area by drive time and competition, and measures how much of their grocery spending the store can take from the supermarkets, discount grocers, dollar stores and specialty markets already there. It then builds sales per square foot, gross margin department by department and shrink on produce, meat, dairy and bakery, because a small slip in margin wipes out a grocer's cash flow. Cost covers refrigeration, freezer and display cases, a generator and the opening inventory. Coverage is tested with a new competitor in the trade area. At the $310,000 7(a) median the sales model carries most of the case; at the $846,000 504 median the cost and value sections carry as much.

Is a study for buying an existing grocery store different from one for a new store?

The emphasis shifts. For a purchase, the study starts from the store's own sales, margin and shrink history and tests whether they survive the change of owner and the new debt; for a new store, it has to build sales from the trade area up, with a ramp to stabilized volume. This page's figures show the split in size: the 7(a) grocery median is $310,000 and its lower quartile $100,000, while the 504 median is $846,000 and its upper quartile $1.6 million. A request well above the 7(a) median with no building behind it needs the study to explain where the extra money goes.

Which SBA program finances more grocery stores, 7(a) or 504?

7(a), by a wide margin in count: 3,701 grocery loans from FY2017 to FY2026 against 488 under 504. The 504 loans are larger, at a median of $846,000 against $310,000, and their lower quartile of $437,250 already sits above the 7(a) median. California has the most 504 grocery loans, 112, then Florida with 37, New York with 27 and Wisconsin with 24. In New York, 524 of the 551 grocery loans went through 7(a). We write the study for the program in the file, because 7(a) and 504 put the weight of the review in different places.

What loan amounts do grocery stores usually borrow under SBA programs?

Most 7(a) grocery loans are small and most 7(a) grocery dollars sit in large loans. Under 7(a), 1,370 grocery loans are for $150,000 or less, and as a group they hold only $96.5 million, while the 383 loans in the band just under the top hold $1.24 billion. Medians move with place: $100,000 in Ohio, Massachusetts and Connecticut, $581,000 in California and $763,000 in Utah; among metros, $50,000 in Columbus and $1.6 million in Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford. The study sizes the request against the row closest to the store, not against the national median alone.

How often do SBA grocery store loans go bad?

The 7(a) charge-off floor for grocery stores is 7.6% for the FY2017 to FY2021 disbursement cohort, and 3.8% of 7(a) grocery loans were charged off within five years; 504 shows 0.00% on both measures. All of these rates are floors, counting the losses booked so far, and the page prints none for a cohort below 30 loans. By state the floors run from 0.00% in Florida and Minnesota to 13.2% in Illinois; by metro, from 6.2% in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim to 14.1% in New York-Newark-Jersey City; and among lenders, TD Bank, National Association shows 24.4%.

How often does an approved grocery store loan fall through before closing?

Cancellation floors on FY2017 to FY2024 approvals are 12.5% for 7(a) grocery loans and 13.3% for 504: at least that share never funded. The state floors range widely: 21.1% in Maryland, 20.0% in New York, 16.7% in New Jersey and Utah and 16.3% in Texas, down to 5.0% in North Carolina and 2.2% in Ohio. The record does not give the reasons. A study narrows the ones a buyer can control by testing the cost budget, the value an appraisal is likely to support and the source of the equity before the lender commits.

Where in the country are SBA grocery store loans concentrated?

California is first, 749 loans for $688.7 million from FY2017 to FY2026, and New York second, 551 for $497.9 million. Florida and Michigan follow at 187 loans each, Texas at 182, Ohio at 177, Illinois at 174, New Jersey at 164, Washington at 157 and Pennsylvania at 153. By dollars, Florida's $239.6 million and Texas's $221.6 million rank third and fourth, ahead of Michigan's $168.9 million. At the thin end, Wyoming has 5 loans, New Mexico 4 and West Virginia 2, and a study there leans on the trade area rather than the state record.

Which metro areas see the most grocery store loans?

By loan count the New York-Newark-Jersey City metro is first, with 559 loans and $534.4 million. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim follows with 269 loans and $206.0 million, then San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont with 149, Chicago-Naperville-Elgin with 142, Boston-Cambridge-Newton with 116, Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington with 107 and Detroit-Warren-Dearborn with 95. San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas appears with 62 loans. Metro medians range from $50,000 in Columbus to $1.6 million in Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, so the metro row, where there is one, is the first benchmark a study for a store in that metro uses.

Which banks make SBA loans to grocery stores?

The Huntington National Bank has the most grocery loans on this page, 241 for $92.4 million, then TD Bank, National Association with 181 and U.S. Bank, National Association with 125; Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company and Bank of Hope share fourth place at 119 each. By dollars NewBank leads with $166.5 million on 107 loans, followed by Metro City Bank with $139.9 million on 81. The table runs down to Lendistry SBLC, LLC at 26 loans and lists no lender with fewer than 5. A study written for one of these lenders is read against that lender's own grocery book.

Is SBA lending to grocery stores rising or falling?

Loan counts are far below their peak while dollars sit near their high. 7(a) grocery approvals reached 1,015 in FY2005; FY2025 had 429 and FY2026 had 357. Dollars went the other way: the 7(a) record is $407.4 million in FY2021, and FY2025 ($353.4 million) and FY2026 ($325.9 million) rank second and third. On the 504 side the dollar record is $90.6 million in FY2022, and FY2026's $83.3 million ranks second. Lenders are financing fewer grocery projects than in the mid-2000s, at larger sizes, and a study is expected to carry evidence in proportion.

My state has too few grocery loans for a rate. What will the lender compare my project to?

The state's own row comes first, even without a rate. The states from Maine (35 loans, median $228,000) to Tennessee (27 loans, median $310,600) show loans, dollars and a median but no floor, as each cohort there is smaller than 30 loans; from Kansas (22 loans, $17.0 million) to Wyoming (5 loans) only loans and dollars appear. New Mexico and West Virginia show a loan count alone, 4 and 2, with no dollar total beside it. Puerto Rico's 100 loans for $19.1 million are in the page's original state list. In all of these places the study uses the national floors, 7.6% for 7(a) and 0.00% for 504, says that it does, and puts its weight on the trade area and the store.

My store also sells fuel, or is closer to a convenience store. Does this record apply?

Only if the loan carries a grocery store industry code. SBA's files assign each loan to a class through the borrower's industry code: a business coded as a convenience store, or a fuel station that also sells groceries, falls in a different class on this site and is not among the 3,701 7(a) and 488 504 grocery loans here. Grocers that borrow without an SBA guarantee, chains included, are outside the record altogether. The study benchmarks against the class that code places the loan in, and where a store straddles classes it says which record it uses and why.

Can the same kind of study serve a USDA Business and Industry grocery loan?

Yes: Loan Analytics also writes grocery studies for B&I lenders, alongside its SBA and conventional work. The tables on this page count SBA 7(a) and 504 loans only, so for a B&I grocery project the SBA record is the outside comparison: the national 7(a) floor of 7.6%, the state row and the nearest metro. The 2026 fee survey on this site records published ranges of $7,500 to $18,750 and above for studies that follow 7 CFR Part 5001.

Back to the contents

Loan Analytics prepares the feasibility study a lender reads before it commits: for a grocery store project anywhere in the United States, financed under SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry or a conventional bank loan. Tell us the project and the lender's deadline, and we reply with scope, timeline and fee.

Request Scope & Timeline

Start with the data.

Contact Us