State Feasibility Study Data

Alaska Feasibility Study Consultants

Alaska is the largest state in the nation by a wide margin and among the least densely populated places in the country, home to an economy built on oil, the federal government, and transportation, and a market where companies approved for SBA loans recently received the highest average funding per company of any state, and a feasibility study in Alaska sits at the center of how lenders move SBA and USDA projects from application to approval. The state operates a roughly $58 billion economy led by government, energy, and its role as a Pacific cargo hub, its population is concentrated around Anchorage and has held roughly flat amid years of net out-migration, and its commercial real estate and construction markets carry some of the highest costs in the nation. Loan Analytics publishes the lending, demographic, and commercial real estate data behind those numbers, and prepares independent feasibility studies for SBA 7(a), SBA 504, and USDA-financed projects across Alaska when a lender requires the full report. This page lays out the current Alaska market and explains what a feasibility study consultant actually delivers for a credit file.

Alaska feasibility study consultant

A lender weighing an Alaska loan under SBA 7(a), the 504 program or the USDA Business and Industry guarantee often wants a third-party study in hand before its credit committee meets, and Loan Analytics is the Alaska feasibility study consultant that writes it. The starting point is the state's own record. Over FY2017 to FY2026, Alaska projects received 1,190 SBA approvals worth $821.0 million; 724 of them, for $555.8 million, went to the Anchorage metro and 120, for $73.7 million, to Fairbanks-College. Within the classes tracked here Alaska counts 340 loans and $274.7 million, split between 281 7(a) loans for $223.1 million and 59 504 loans for $51.6 million.

Those rows set a study's priorities. Full-service restaurants lead with 54 loans and limited-service restaurants follow with 39, then automotive repair with 28, dental offices with 26 and hotels with 22, while breweries, wineries and distilleries add 18 loans worth $23.5 million, more dollars than the repair or hotel rows. Dental offices print the highest median loan of any class at $637,350. On the loss side, Alaska's tracked classes print a 2.1% charge-off floor, the lowest minimum in the Pacific division, where Hawaii prints 9.2%. Each Loan Analytics report places the subject inside its class row and its own place: the households and income of its trade area, the operators already competing for them, what it costs to build or buy in that borough or census area, the months to stabilized revenue, and the coverage of debt service left after a downside case drawn from Alaska's own history.

Rural Alaska needs a different file, and the study is built for it. USDA B&I guaranteed loan awards for Alaska projects reached $59.2 million in FY2025, and from FY2015 to FY2026 the Nome census area drew 12 awards, the Kenai Peninsula 9 and Sitka 6, the last carrying $58.3 million, while Anchorage drew 1. Projects in those places have no SBA metro row to cite, so Loan Analytics assembles the demand case from the ground up and writes the report to the standard of the program in question, whether its reader is a bank credit committee, a certified development company or a USDA reviewer.

Request Scope & Timeline

Small Town Shops

SBA Lending in Alaska: The Current Picture

Alaska is one of the smallest SBA markets in the country by loan count, a function of its small population, but it has a defining distinction: its loans are among the largest in the nation on average. In the most recently analyzed full federal fiscal year, Alaska companies approved for SBA 7(a) and 504 loans received the highest average funding per company of any state, at roughly $767,000, ahead of Georgia and Oklahoma, a direct reflection of the high project costs that come with building and operating in a remote, high-cost state. The agency administers Alaska through its district office in Anchorage, which serves the entire state, and lending concentrates in the population centers: Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, Fairbanks, the Kenai Peninsula, and Juneau. The state itself adds capacity through the Alaska Division of Investments, which runs small-business loan programs that fill gaps left by the limited private banking footprint, an important resource in a state this size.

The national program sets the backdrop for every Alaska deal. The SBA guaranteed 70,242 7(a) loans worth $31.1 billion in FY2024, then closed FY2025 at 84,840 Corrected combined 7(a) and 504 loans for $45.09 billion Corrected, the most capital the agency has ever approved in a single year, against a national average loan size of $443,097, a figure Alaska's per-company average runs well above. That record volume came alongside materially stricter underwriting standards, which means busier credit desks paired with closer scrutiny of the borrower projections inside each application. An Alaska feasibility study consultant earns a place in the file precisely because independent market work gives a credit committee something concrete to test the borrower's assumptions against.

The practical point for a borrower or lender searching for a feasibility study consultant in Alaska is that the document is not a box-checking exercise. On startup projects, on change-of-ownership transactions where the buyer has no operating history at the site, and on ground-up construction with no existing revenue to underwrite, the feasibility study is the analysis that lets a credit committee size the deal with confidence, and the large average deal size in Alaska raises the stakes on getting the projections right. The 504 program in particular, which finances owner-occupied real estate and major fixed assets through a Certified Development Company alongside a conventional lender, matters in a market with Alaska's construction costs. The vast majority of the state, one of the most rural in the nation, sits in USDA-eligible territory, and USDA Business and Industry lending runs alongside the SBA programs across its remote communities, where it is an especially important rural-development tool. An Alaska feasibility study company that understands both the SBA standard operating procedures and the distinct economics of operating in Alaska is doing two jobs at once: satisfying a federal documentation requirement and giving the lender a defensible basis for its credit decision.

Where Alaska Is Growing: Population and County Demographics

Alaska is the forty-eighth-most-populous state at roughly 738,000 residents, yet it is the largest state by land area by a wide margin, which makes it among the least densely populated places in the country. Two facts dominate any demand analysis: the population is heavily concentrated in the south-central region, and the state has just recorded its thirteenth consecutive year of net out-migration, the longest such streak in decades, with modest overall growth coming only because births continue to outnumber deaths.

The geography is unlike any other state, organized into boroughs and census areas rather than conventional counties. The Anchorage and Matanuska-Susitna region holds more than half the state's people, with Anchorage itself accounting for roughly 40 percent of all Alaskans at around 285,000 residents, a population that has been essentially flat to slightly down. The standout growth story is the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, the fast-growing suburban area north of Anchorage around Wasilla and Palmer, which has expanded more than 10 percent as families priced out of Anchorage housing relocate to more affordable communities. The Fairbanks North Star Borough, anchored by the University of Alaska and major military installations, is the Interior hub and the second-largest urban center, while Juneau, the capital, anchors the southeast. Many rural and predominantly Alaska Native census areas have lost population sharply. Alaska has the highest share of Indigenous residents of any state, a median age around 37, and a cost of living that runs well above national norms and far higher in rural villages. A project that pencils cleanly in Anchorage or the growing Mat-Su Valley can face a completely different demand and cost picture in Fairbanks or a remote community, and the Alaska label alone tells a lender almost nothing. The work is in the trade area.

Alaska Commercial Real Estate: The Five Major Markets

An Alaska feasibility study lives or dies on which region and which asset class are in question, because the state's commercial real estate is concentrated in a handful of population centers separated by enormous distances, and the cost basis is unlike anywhere else in the country.

Anchorage is the dominant market by a wide margin, the economic, logistical, and transportation hub of the state, home to Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, one of the busiest cargo airports in the world, along with the headquarters of the oil and gas industry, major military installations, and the bulk of the state's office, retail, and industrial real estate. The Matanuska-Susitna Valley is the residential and commercial growth frontier feeding off Anchorage. Fairbanks is the Interior's center, supported by the university, the military at Fort Wainwright and Eielson Air Force Base, and resource industries. Juneau combines state government with a substantial cruise-tourism economy, and the Kenai Peninsula rounds out the major regions with tourism, fishing, and energy. The asset classes follow these markets. Hospitality is a powerful and distinctive demand driver built on Alaska's enormous tourism economy, especially the summer cruise season and the draw of Denali and the national parks, with pronounced seasonality the central feature of any analysis. Multifamily and workforce-housing demand is strongest in Anchorage and the Mat-Su Valley. Industrial and logistics real estate is significant given Anchorage's global air-cargo role. The asset classes a feasibility study in Alaska most often covers therefore include a hotel or lodge feasibility study tied to the visitor season, an RV park or campground feasibility study tied to summer tourism, a restaurant or franchise feasibility study, a multifamily or workforce-housing feasibility study driven by the Mat-Su growth, a self-storage feasibility study, an assisted living or senior housing feasibility study tied to the aging population, a gas station and convenience store feasibility study along the limited highway network, and an industrial or warehouse feasibility study tied to the cargo and resource economy. Each is a distinct analysis, and a state as varied as Anchorage, the Mat-Su Valley, Fairbanks, Juneau, and the rural regions cannot be served by a generic template that simply swaps in the word Alaska.

Construction Costs: The Alaska Picture

Hard costs feed straight into total project cost, loan sizing, and the debt-service coverage a lender stress-tests, so a current read on construction inflation belongs in every Alaska feasibility study, and nowhere in the country does it carry more weight. The Mortenson Construction Cost Index for the first quarter of 2026 put national nonresidential costs up 1.69 percent for the quarter and 6.77 percent year over year. Mortenson does not publish an Alaska index or track an Alaska metro, so the national figure is only a starting point, and it materially understates the state.

The reason is the combination of remoteness and climate. Alaska's construction costs are among the highest in the United States because most building materials have to be shipped, barged, or in remote cases flown in, adding substantial freight cost and lead time. An extremely short building season compresses the construction calendar into a few months, permafrost and seismic conditions demand specialized foundation and structural engineering, energy and heating costs are very high, and the local pool of skilled trades is limited. In rural villages off the road system, costs can run to multiples of urban Anchorage levels because every input and every worker must be flown or barged in. This cost reality is a direct driver of why Alaska's SBA loans are the largest in the nation on average. A market with these dynamics demands a cost basis built from current local conditions and live Alaska bids rather than a national average, and a feasibility study earns its keep by grounding the cost and operating side of the pro forma in the realities of building in the specific Alaska location.

What an Alaska Feasibility Study Consultant Delivers

Read the lending, demographic, and market data together and the assignment becomes concrete. Alaska sends a steady stream of projects to credit committees, frequently tied to its energy, transportation, tourism, fishing, and owner-occupied real estate base, with the largest average loan sizes in the country and the same scrutiny under tighter underwriting. Population that is concentrated around Anchorage and the Mat-Su Valley, holding flat amid persistent out-migration, with an aging profile and declining rural regions, means a demand case has to be built at the regional level rather than the state level. Commercial real estate concentrated in a few centers separated by vast distances, carrying the highest costs in the nation, means location, asset selection, and a defensible cost basis drive the outcome. And construction costs shaped by remoteness, a short season, and specialized engineering mean a budget assembled a year ago is already stale.

A feasibility study consultant brings those threads together into a single third-party document written for the lender's file. The work that distinguishes a credible Alaska feasibility study company is independence and evidence: the consultant is a party independent of both borrower and lender, and the conclusions are tied to verifiable trade-area demographics, a documented competitive supply analysis, demand and absorption modeling, financial projections, and sensitivity testing organized around what a credit committee actually reviews. SBA and USDA guidelines call for exactly this kind of independent study on many startup, expansion, and new-construction projects, and the lender typically orders it once the deal is in underwriting.

The state's investment profile sharpens the need for current data. Alaska operates a real economy of roughly $58 billion, and its output per person ranks around eighth-highest in the entire country, a standing alongside states like Connecticut and Colorado that reflects an unusually high-value, resource-rich base for its small population. Economists have long described the economy as a three-legged stool. The first leg is government, the state's single largest sector, reflecting a very large federal and military presence that includes major installations around Anchorage and Fairbanks. The second leg is mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction, the historic core of the economy, anchored by North Slope production and the Trans-Alaska Pipeline and underpinning the Alaska Permanent Fund, a multibillion-dollar sovereign wealth fund built from oil royalties that pays an annual dividend to residents. The third leg is everything else, including transportation and warehousing, which is a major sector in its own right given Anchorage's role as one of the world's busiest air-cargo hubs. Seafood is the state's largest export after oil and gas, drawn from the nation's largest fishery, and tourism built on cruises and the national parks is a major pillar, while healthcare has been among the fastest-growing sectors. Alaska levies no state income tax and no state sales tax, funded instead by resource revenue. The chief headwinds worth naming are a heavy dependence on volatile oil prices and long-term production decline, the persistent out-migration of working-age residents, the highest costs in the nation, and exposure to shifts in federal policy. Each of those forces reshapes trade-area demand, labor demand, and absorption in the markets around it, and none of it shows up in a generic template, which is the entire reason a project-specific study exists.

Work With an Alaska Feasibility Study Consultant

Loan Analytics prepares independent feasibility studies for SBA 7(a), SBA 504, and USDA-financed projects across Alaska, built on the same data published on this page and extended to the subject property. The study arrives as a third-party document, written for the lender's file, covering trade-area demographics, competitive supply, demand and absorption, financial projections, and sensitivity testing. To scope one, use the form below or write to Info@analytics.loan. Include the property type, the region or borough, and the loan program, and we come back with scope and timeline.

Request Scope & Timeline

SBA loan record in Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans approved for projects in Alaska across the asset classes Loan Analytics tracks, from SBA's own loan-level files.

LoansDollars
Both programs340$274.7 million
SBA 7(a)281$223.1 million
SBA 50459$51.6 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record in Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#state-record.

Cancelled after approval, FY2017 to FY2024 approvals (a floor)10.8%
Charged off to date, FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans (a floor)2.1%
Charged off within five years of approval0.70%

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record in Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#state-record.

Both rates are floors: SBA withholds the status of open loans. A rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort.

SBA loans approved in Alaska by fiscal year, in the asset classes with 10 or more loans and approvals in 5 or more fiscal years

01020304050FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 28Loans, FY2018: 34Loans, FY2019: 22Loans, FY2020: 17Loans, FY2021: 33Loans, FY2022: 19Loans, FY2023: 34Loans, FY2024: 31Loans, FY2025: 41Loans, FY2026: 22
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY201728$25.6 million
FY201834$20.1 million
FY201922$12.9 million
FY202017$8.6 million
FY202133$35.6 million
FY202219$13.3 million
FY202334$24.1 million
FY202431$20.9 million
FY202541$33.6 million
FY202622$23.7 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record in Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#state-record.

Asset classes in Alaska, ranked by loans

Asset classLoansDollars
Full-service restaurant54$31.1 million
Limited-service restaurant39$25.5 million
Automotive mechanical repair (car and truck)28$23.4 million
Dental office26$23.6 million
Hotel and motel22$22.2 million
Beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries)18$23.5 million
Medical office (physicians)16$8.6 million
Assisted living (without nursing care)15$18.7 million
Veterinary clinic15$18.8 million
Fitness center15$5.6 million
Coffee shop and snack bar12$4.8 million
Rehabilitation and therapy clinic11$6.8 million
Liquor store10$5.9 million
Nonresidential lessor (flex, office and retail investor buildings)9$12.0 million
Grocery store8$5.1 million
Child care center7$5.7 million
Beauty salon6$430,000
Caterers (includes banquet halls with catering staff)4fewer than five loans
Gas station and truck stop3fewer than five loans
Self storage3fewer than five loans
Continuing care retirement community3fewer than five loans
Data center3fewer than five loans
Car wash2fewer than five loans
RV park and campground2fewer than five loans
Multifamily (lessors of residential buildings)2fewer than five loans
Skilled nursing2fewer than five loans
Marina2fewer than five loans
Diagnostic imaging center1fewer than five loans
Behavioral health and addiction treatment1fewer than five loans
School (elementary and secondary, including charter)1fewer than five loans

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record in Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#state-record.

Most active SBA lenders in Alaska's largest classes

Full-service restaurant, SBA 7(a): lenders by loans approved
LenderLoans
Northrim Bank8
KeyBank National Association7
Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc.6
Wells Fargo Bank National Association5

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, Full-service restaurant, SBA 7(a): lenders by loans approved, https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#state-record.

Limited-service restaurant, SBA 7(a): lenders by loans approved
LenderLoans
Northrim Bank7
Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc.5

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, Limited-service restaurant, SBA 7(a): lenders by loans approved, https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#state-record.

Feasibility study data by asset class in Alaska

Feasibility study data by asset class and SBA program in Alaska

Feasibility study data by metro area in Alaska

Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30. Totals add the state's cells across the tracked asset classes; they are not all SBA lending in Alaska.

Feasibility study questions for Alaska

How many SBA loans have gone to Alaska projects in the asset classes Loan Analytics tracks?

Alaska's tracked total is small: 340 SBA loans for $274.7 million over FY2017 to FY2026, counting only the asset classes this site measures rather than every SBA loan in the state. Of those, 281 loans ($223.1 million) came through 7(a) and 59 ($51.6 million) through 504. Annual volume swung from a low of 17 loans in FY2020 to a high of 41 in FY2025, which carried $33.6 million.

Which asset classes receive the most SBA loans in Alaska?

Full-service restaurants lead with 54 loans and $31.1 million, followed by limited-service restaurants at 39 loans. Automotive mechanical repair shops (28 loans, $23.4 million) and dental offices (26 loans, $23.6 million) come next, then hotels and motels with 22. Breweries, wineries and distilleries, counted as beverage manufacturing, add 18 loans worth $23.5 million, a notable share for a state this size.

How often are SBA loans in Alaska cancelled or charged off?

Of Alaska loans approved from FY2017 to FY2024, no fewer than 10.8% ended in cancellation after approval. Loans disbursed between FY2017 and FY2021 show charge-offs to date of 2.1% or more, and a five-year charge-off floor of just 0.70%. Read all three as lower bounds computed from the tracked classes; they describe the cohort, not the odds for one borrower.

Which lenders make the most SBA loans in Alaska?

Only 7(a) lender tables appear for Alaska's three biggest classes. Northrim Bank leads full-service restaurants with 8 loans, ahead of KeyBank National Association at 7 and Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc. at 6, and it also tops limited-service restaurants with 7, where Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO follows with 5. Automotive mechanical repair, the third class, has no lender with 5 or more loans.

Which Alaska programs can support a project financed with an SBA or USDA loan?

Alaska's state agency sites returned an automated browser check when Loan Analytics tried to read them, so this answer names the agency instead of listing programs. The Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development is the place to ask which state financing or incentive programs fit a project that also carries an SBA or USDA loan. Ask early, since any state funding the sponsor counts on has to be documented in the study's sources and uses.

Which state permits and approvals should a feasibility study for a project in Alaska account for?

For permits, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation is the agency to contact; its pages were out of reach for this answer, so specific permits are not listed here. A feasibility study for an Alaska project should confirm with the department which water, wastewater or air approvals apply to the site and the use, and should carry the expected timing of each into the schedule, alongside any borough or municipal approvals.

What does a feasibility study cost?

Alaska's most common tracked loans are restaurants, and the price bands Loan Analytics publishes place a single-site restaurant study at $5,000 to $12,500. A project that also needs a USDA Business and Industry study to the Part 5001 standard is priced to that longer list, at $7,500 to $18,750 and above, with a 6 to 12 week turnaround. Thin rural markets add fieldwork, since comparables must be verified in person. No fee is fixed until the scope is set.

Source: SBA Feasibility Study Cost in 2026: Price Bands by Asset Class, and the Fee as Basis Points of the Loan, Loan Analytics

What does a feasibility study for a project in Alaska test first?

Alaska's record is led by restaurants (54 full-service and 39 limited-service loans) and by repair shops, dental offices and small lodging, each with modest loan counts. In a market this size, the method's first test is whether the evidence exists: where sub-county data and comparables are thin, it adds direct competitor surveys, operator interviews and field verification instead of assuming. Trade-area drawing then follows real road access, which in much of Alaska sets the market more than distance does.

Source: How a Feasibility Study Is Done: The Loan Analytics Methodology, Loan Analytics

Worked examples

SBA lending in Alaska, FY1991 to FY2026

Every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan approved for a project in Alaska since FY1991, by fiscal year, from SBA's own loan files.

Alaska's 7(a) count peaked early and has never returned to that level. Approvals climbed from 79 in FY1991 to 216 in FY1993, 256 in FY1994 and 318 in FY1995, the highest count in the table, then fell to 189 in FY1996, 103 in FY1997 and 69 in FY1999, bottoming at 49 in FY2002. Dollars for FY1992, FY1993, FY1995 and FY1997 are withheld, so the peak cannot be sized in dollars; FY1994 can, and its 256 loans carried $56.3 million. In FY2026, 89 loans carried $70.5 million. Alaska's SBA lending now runs on far fewer and far larger loans than in the mid-1990s, and a study written today backs a much bigger commitment than most loans in the table's early years.

The rebuild after FY2002 came in two stages. From FY2004 to FY2007 the count rose from 105 to 148 and dollars from $14.7 million to $39.4 million. FY2008 held $40.3 million on 120 loans, then FY2009 fell to $22.7 million on 118: approvals barely moved while the dollars behind them dropped, which is how a downturn shows up in Alaska's record, in the size of loans more than their number. FY2010 recovered to $41.8 million on 124. The second stage grew dollars rather than loans, from $51.6 million on 115 loans in FY2011 to $60.0 million on 113 in FY2014 and $73.8 million on 149 in FY2015, and FY2016's 155 loans were the most since FY1996.

The recent decade is uneven. FY2017 dropped to 100 loans and $46.5 million, FY2018 carried $84.7 million on 105, and FY2020 fell to 73 loans and $30.4 million, the fewest 7(a) approvals since FY2002. FY2021 set the dollar record at $99.3 million on 120 loans, the same year the tracked-class series on this page peaked in dollars at $35.6 million on 33 loans. FY2024 and FY2025 each recorded 116 loans, with dollars easing from $86.9 million to $80.4 million, and FY2026 closed at 89 loans and $70.5 million. A credit officer knows a year like FY2020 sits inside the last decade, and the downside case should show the subject servicing its debt through one.

504 lending came to Alaska late and has stayed volatile. The table prints no 504 loans in FY1991, FY1994 and FY1996, and the other years before FY1998 have too few for a dollar figure; FY1998 is the first year with one, 9 loans for $3.4 million. The program rose to 26 loans and $16.1 million in FY2005, fell to 13 in FY2006, and printed between 17 and 25 loans a year from FY2007 to FY2015. Its record is FY2022, with 29 loans and $26.8 million, and FY2023 followed with 28 loans and $17.6 million. Since FY2017 the annual count has run from 8 loans, in FY2019 with $3.2 million, up to that FY2022 high, and FY2026 returned to 23 loans and $18.3 million after 13 loans and $6.7 million in FY2025.

Those swings matter to a sponsor planning a 504 project. The program pays for real estate and major fixed assets the business will occupy, with a certified development company working beside the bank, and in Alaska that pairing has handled as few as 8 loans in a recent year. A 504 study here is read by both institutions against a short local record, so it brings its own evidence on construction cost, occupancy and value rather than leaning on precedent. The FY2022 peak shows the other side: FY2022's $26.8 million of 504 loans exceeded the 7(a) dollars of FY1996 and of every year from FY1998 to FY2004.

Over FY1991 to FY2026 the table holds 4,378 7(a) loans for $1.63 billion and 531 504 loans for $329.4 million. The decade from FY2017 accounts for 1,013 of those 7(a) loans and $694.0 million, a minority of the loans and a far larger part of the dollars, and for 177 of the 504 loans and $127.0 million. Because the high-count 1990s print withheld dollars, Alaska's loan size has to be read from the recent decade, while the count history shows how far the program's reach can contract, from 318 loans in FY1995 to 49 in FY2002. Every figure is a gross approval with cancelled approvals included; a study quoting Alaska volume from another series should name it.

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans approved in Alaska by fiscal year
Fiscal yearSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
FY199179$18.3 million0$0
FY1992143withheld2fewer than 5 loans
FY1993216withheld1fewer than 5 loans
FY1994256$56.3 million0$0
FY1995318withheld1fewer than 5 loans
FY1996189$24.8 million0$0
FY1997103withheld1fewer than 5 loans
FY199880$15.0 million9$3.4 million
FY199969$15.0 million13$4.0 million
FY200077$14.3 million7$3.5 million
FY200171$20.1 million14$7.2 million
FY200249$11.4 million12$4.3 million
FY200377$16.1 million19$7.9 million
FY2004105$14.7 million23$11.1 million
FY2005119$28.7 million26$16.1 million
FY2006142$34.6 million13$6.6 million
FY2007148$39.4 million24$17.3 million
FY2008120$40.3 million23$11.2 million
FY2009118$22.7 million20$6.9 million
FY2010124$41.8 million24$11.6 million
FY2011115$51.6 million23$15.5 million
FY2012121$57.3 million25$19.6 million
FY2013109$51.9 million20$15.4 million
FY2014113$60.0 million17$13.2 million
FY2015149$73.8 million24$19.1 million
FY2016155$68.5 million13$7.2 million
FY2017100$46.5 million14$15.3 million
FY2018105$84.7 million19$7.3 million
FY2019103$61.7 million8$3.2 million
FY202073$30.4 million9$5.6 million
FY2021120$99.3 million19$12.6 million
FY202284$60.1 million29$26.8 million
FY2023107$73.5 million28$17.6 million
FY2024116$86.9 million15$13.6 million
FY2025116$80.4 million13$6.7 million
FY202689$70.5 million23$18.3 million
FY1991 to FY20264,378$1.63 billion531$329.4 million
FY2017 to FY20261,013$694.0 million177$127.0 million

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA 7(a) and 504 loans approved in Alaska by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#sba-record-sba-by-year.

Back to the contents

Asset classes financed in Alaska, ranked

Each asset class Loan Analytics tracks, ranked by SBA loans approved in Alaska from FY2017 to FY2026, with loan size, program split and the cohort floors where at least 30 loans support them.

Restaurants hold the top two rows of Alaska's class ranking, 54 full-service loans for $31.1 million and 39 limited-service loans for $25.5 million, and no other class comes near them by count. By dollars the field closes up: dental offices ($23.6 million on 26 loans), beverage manufacturing ($23.5 million on 18), automotive repair ($23.4 million on 28) and hotels and motels ($22.2 million on 22) sit close together below the restaurants. Breweries, wineries and distilleries rank sixth by count and fourth by dollars, ahead of repair shops and hotels, so a beverage-manufacturing loan in Alaska tends to be larger than a repair-shop loan, and its study has to support the plant behind the loan as well as the sales forecast.

Medians print only where a class has enough loans, and they rank dental offices first at $637,350, then automotive repair at $486,500, limited-service restaurants at $350,000 and full-service restaurants at $348,500. Dental ranks fourth by count and first by median: the typical Alaska dental loan is the largest of any class with a printed median, and a dental study is weighed on the patient base and on the office cost or purchase price the loan finances. The two restaurant medians are nearly identical, which makes their gap on cancellations the sharpest contrast in the table.

The cancellation floor is 2.3% for full-service restaurants and 12.5% for limited-service ones, against 10.8% for all tracked classes in Alaska. Two segments with almost the same median loan show very different minimum shares of approvals later cancelled. Why an Alaska approval was cancelled is not something the SBA data discloses, so a study cannot name a cause, but it can close the questions that leave an approval open: site control, franchise and permit approvals, a build-out budget the lender can check, and an opening sales forecast tied to the Alaska competitors already trading. For a limited-service project that list is the first work of the study, not an appendix.

Among the classes that print a program split, 504 appears most in full-service restaurants, 12 of 54 loans, and in automotive repair, 9 of 28, while dental offices have 3 of 26 and limited-service restaurants 2 of 39. Because 504 pays for the real estate and major fixed assets a business occupies, an Alaska repair-shop project is more often a building purchase or a construction job than a dental or quick-service deal, and its study needs a property section: the site, the cost of building under Alaska conditions, and the value the lender's appraiser will test. A limited-service restaurant financed almost entirely through 7(a) rests on its operating forecast instead.

Below the median threshold the dollar column still sorts the classes. Veterinary clinics, assisted living and fitness centers each have 15 loans, yet veterinary clinics carry $18.8 million and assisted living $18.7 million against $5.6 million for fitness centers. Nonresidential lessors, with 9 loans, hold $12.0 million, more than physicians' medical offices with 16 loans and $8.6 million. Coffee shops (12 loans, $4.8 million) and beauty salons (6 loans, $430,000) sit at the small end, and hotels and motels, despite 22 loans, print neither a median nor a program split. Where the loans are large, the study's weight falls on construction cost, appraised value and equity; where they are small, on sales, staffing and the competitors in the subject's own community.

Several classes this site tracks nationally barely register in Alaska. Gas stations and truck stops, self storage, continuing care retirement communities and data centers show 3 loans each, and car washes, RV parks, multifamily, skilled nursing and marinas 2 each, too few for any measure beyond count and dollars. No class reaches the 30 loans its charge-off cohort needs, so the state-level floors for the tracked classes, 2.1% charged off to date and 0.70% within five years, are the only loss figures Alaska's record gives. For an RV park built on the summer visitor season or a gas station on the state's short highway network, the study builds its downside from the subject's market and tells the lender that Alaska has no loss record of its own for the class.

SBA loans in Alaska by asset class, FY2017 to FY2026
Asset classLoansDollarsMedian loanSBA 7(a) loansSBA 504 loansCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
Full-service restaurant54$31.1 million$348,50042122.3%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Limited-service restaurant39$25.5 million$350,00037212.5%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Automotive mechanical repair (car and truck)28$23.4 million$486,500199not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Dental office26$23.6 million$637,350233not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Hotel and motel22$22.2 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries)18$23.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Medical office (physicians)16$8.6 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Assisted living (without nursing care)15$18.7 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Veterinary clinic15$18.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Fitness center15$5.6 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Coffee shop and snack bar12$4.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Rehabilitation and therapy clinic11$6.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Liquor store10$5.9 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Nonresidential lessor (flex, office and retail investor buildings)9$12.0 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Grocery store8$5.1 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Child care center7$5.7 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Beauty salon6$430,000too few loans for these measures
Caterers (includes banquet halls with catering staff)4fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Gas station and truck stop3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Self storage3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Continuing care retirement community3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Data center3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Car wash2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
RV park and campground2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Multifamily (lessors of residential buildings)2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Skilled nursing2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Marina2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Diagnostic imaging center1fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Behavioral health and addiction treatment1fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
School (elementary and secondary, including charter)1fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA loans in Alaska by asset class, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#asset-classes-classes.

Back to the contents

Metro and micro areas in Alaska

SBA lending in the metropolitan and micropolitan areas that reach into Alaska, ranked by loans: every SBA 7(a) and 504 approval in each area, all industries together, not only the asset classes Loan Analytics tracks.

SBA lending in Alaska runs through Anchorage. The Anchorage metro drew 724 loans and $555.8 million from FY2017 to FY2026, against 1,190 loans and $821.0 million for the whole state in the division table on this page, so most of Alaska's SBA loans and most of its SBA dollars sit in one metro. Fairbanks-College, the only other area in the table, drew 120 loans and $73.7 million. No micro area appears, which leaves Juneau, the Kenai Peninsula and the census areas off the road system without an area-level SBA benchmark of their own.

The medians separate the two metros more sharply than the counts. Anchorage's median loan is $432,250; Fairbanks-College's is $250,000, below the median of every asset class that prints one, from full-service restaurants at $348,500 to dental offices at $637,350. Anchorage's median sits between the restaurant medians and the repair-shop median of $486,500. A Fairbanks study, then, usually supports a smaller loan in a smaller market, and the lender will expect demand to be shown from the Interior trade area itself, not borrowed from statewide figures that Anchorage dominates.

Anchorage prints a charge-off floor of 1.6%. Fairbanks-College's rate is withheld, which says nothing about its losses in either direction, and it must not be quoted as a clean record. The Anchorage row covers every SBA loan in the metro, not only the tracked classes, so it does not compare like for like with the state's 2.1% floor for tracked classes. What it gives an Anchorage study is a minimum loss figure for the market as a whole, and a lender will ask why the subject should beat that floor if the projection assumes a smooth ramp to stabilized sales.

Outside these two areas, the evidence has to be assembled on the ground. The USDA county table on this page shows B&I awards in places with no SBA area row, such as the Nome census area, Sitka and the Kenai Peninsula, and the lender table shows which institutions carry Alaska books large enough to have seen similar projects. A project brief should tell Loan Analytics exactly where the site is, because that decides whether the study can cite an area SBA record or must build its own from a survey of operating competitors, conversations with local operators and the trade area's own household counts.

SBA loans by metro area touching Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026
Metro or micro areaLoansDollarsMedian loanCharged off (floor)
Anchorage, AK Metro Area724$555.8 million$432,2501.6%
Fairbanks-College, AK Metro Area120$73.7 million$250,000withheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA loans by metro area touching Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#metros-metros.

Back to the contents

SBA lenders in Alaska

The SBA lenders with a recorded book of loans for projects in Alaska, ranked by loans; no lender with fewer than 5 loans is listed.

The lenders with an Alaska SBA book rank one way by loans and another by dollars. Count them by loans and Wells Fargo Bank National Association comes out on top at 200; count dollars and its $83.3 million drops to third. Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc. leads on dollars with $146.4 million from 138 loans, and Evergreen Business Capital is second on both measures, with 184 loans and $126.6 million. Northrim Bank, with 137 loans, is nearly level with Alaska Growth Capital on count but carries $71.6 million. For a sponsor, the dollar ranking is the more useful one: it shows which lenders are used to the size of loan an Alaska project now needs.

The dollar column sorts the table into two kinds of book. Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC carries $72.8 million on 58 loans, more than Northrim Bank on 137, and Live Oak Banking Company carries $49.9 million on 38, more than KeyBank National Association's $35.8 million on 112. Northeast Bank (ME) shows 25 loans for $3.2 million, the smallest book on the list. Newtek appears again as Newtek Bank, National Association, with 38 loans for $26.5 million; the table keeps the two on separate rows. A study sent to a lender whose dollars run ahead of its loan count lands on a credit desk used to large tickets, and it should meet the depth of review such a book implies.

The restaurant lender tables earlier on this page add what the state table cannot. Northrim Bank leads both restaurant classes under 7(a), with 8 full-service loans and 7 limited-service loans; KeyBank National Association has 7 full-service loans, and Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc. 6 full-service and 5 limited-service. Wells Fargo Bank National Association, whose 200 Alaska loans top the state table, shows 5 full-service loans and no row in the limited-service table. Its Alaska book sits mostly outside restaurants, while Northrim's restaurant book is the deepest in the state, and a restaurant sponsor should expect a credit desk that has seen many Alaska restaurants to test the forecast against them.

No lender's loss record can be read from this table. Wells Fargo, Evergreen Business Capital, Alaska Growth Capital, Northrim, KeyBank and Newtek Small Business Finance all print withheld charge-off floors, and the rows below them print none because their cohorts fall short of 30 loans. Withheld is a blank, not a zero, and a study must not present any lender's Alaska record as clean on the strength of one. What the table does give is the list of institutions with at least 5 recorded Alaska loans, the practical starting point for deciding where a study-backed request goes.

The table does not split the lenders by program, so it cannot say which books are 7(a) and which are 504. With only 13 504 loans statewide in FY2025, a 504 project in Alaska is reviewed against a short local record by both the bank and the development company, and the study should establish at scoping which institution holds which part of the financing, so that the report answers both.

SBA lenders by loans approved in Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026
LenderLoansDollarsCharged off (floor)
Wells Fargo Bank National Association200$83.3 millionwithheld
Evergreen Business Capital184$126.6 millionwithheld
Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc.138$146.4 millionwithheld
Northrim Bank137$71.6 millionwithheld
KeyBank National Association112$35.8 millionwithheld
Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC58$72.8 millionwithheld
Newtek Bank, National Association38$26.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Live Oak Banking Company38$49.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Northeast Bank (ME)25$3.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA lenders by loans approved in Alaska, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#lenders-lenders.

Back to the contents

Alaska against its Census division and the nation

Alaska beside the other states of the Pacific Census division, all SBA lending and the tracked asset classes.

Alaska is the smallest SBA market in the Pacific division on every count the table prints: 4,909 loans from FY1991 to FY2026, 1,190 from FY2017 to FY2026 and 340 in the tracked classes, against 8,943, 1,840 and 477 for Hawaii, the next smallest. The dollar column breaks the order. Alaska's $821.0 million over the decade exceeds Hawaii's $552.0 million on fewer loans, so the average Alaska SBA loan is markedly larger than the average Hawaii loan. That is the division table's version of the high-cost point made earlier on this page: Alaska projects cost more to build and to buy, and the loans that finance them are larger.

On losses Alaska sits at the other end of the division. Its charge-off floor for tracked classes is 2.1%, the lowest of the Pacific states, below Washington at 2.5%, Oregon at 2.9% and California at 4.4%, and far below Hawaii at 9.2%. The division's two non-contiguous states show its lowest and its highest floors, which is reason enough not to argue risk from remoteness alone. An Alaska study should present the low floor as part of the record and still test the subject on its own numbers.

The floors are minimums, and the cohorts behind them differ greatly in size, as the tracked-class counts show: 340 loans in Alaska over the decade, 2,398 in Oregon, 5,717 in Washington and 23,668 in California. A handful of outcomes can move a small state's floor, so Alaska's 2.1% is a thinner signal than Washington's 2.5%, and a lender will read it as encouraging rather than conclusive. Where the subject's class has no Alaska floor of its own, which is true of every class in the table on this page, the study takes its downside from the subject's market and the national class record, not from the state's low number.

Against the United States, Alaska is a small file: 1,190 of the nation's 647,329 SBA loans from FY2017 to FY2026, and $821.0 million of $353.09 billion; over the full record, 4,909 of 2,207,426. That scale decides what a study can lean on. National class benchmarks are deep and Alaska's are thin, so an Alaska study earns its place by showing where the subject's market departs from the national pattern, in construction cost, in seasonality and in the reach of its trade area, rather than assuming it follows.

SBA lending: Alaska, the Pacific division and the United States
StateAll SBA loans FY1991 to FY2026All SBA loans FY2017 to FY2026All SBA dollars FY2017 to FY2026Loans in tracked classes FY2017 to FY2026Charged off, tracked classes (floor)
Alaska4,9091,190$821.0 million3402.1%
California301,88281,867$57.18 billion23,6684.4%
Hawaii8,9431,840$552.0 million4779.2%
Oregon28,9089,755$4.99 billion2,3982.9%
Washington56,25217,266$10.47 billion5,7172.5%
United States2,207,426647,329$353.09 billion

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA lending: Alaska, the Pacific division and the United States", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#compare-compare.

Back to the contents

Alaska's economy for a feasibility study

The establishments, jobs and payroll of each asset class's industry in Alaska, and the state's population, income and output, from the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The industry behind Alaska's top SBA class is shrinking while its neighbour grows. Full-service restaurants fell from 576 establishments in 2018 to 533 in 2023 and from 8,623 employees to 8,365, with $302.9 million of payroll in 2023. Limited-service restaurants rose over the same years from 453 establishments to 490 and from 5,959 employees to 6,951, with $182.2 million of payroll. A full-service study in Alaska enters a segment with fewer operators than in 2018 and has to explain why the subject will take share rather than add to the decline; for limited-service, the segment is expanding, so the threat is the next rival opening nearby. Read with the SBA table, that growth sits beside the class's 12.5% cancellation floor, a high minimum share of approvals later cancelled, and a quick-service study should forecast from its own trade area rather than from statewide growth that every new entrant shares.

Automotive repair is growing too. Its NAICS 811111 row went from 198 establishments to 212 and from 881 employees to 1,122, with $70.5 million of payroll in 2023. NAICS 811113 held at 12 establishments while employees fell from 51 to 40, and NAICS 811118 went from 4 establishments to 7 and from 27 employees to 24. Census publishes no Alaska row for NAICS 811112, which may mean none or a withheld cell, and a study must not read it as an empty market. NAICS 811111 and limited-service restaurants are the rows in this table that added both establishments and employees, and a repair-shop study has to count the shops that opened since 2018 in its supply analysis.

Dental offices moved the other way: 332 establishments in 2018 and 315 in 2023, 2,477 employees and then 2,417, with $163.9 million of payroll. The same class carries the highest median SBA loan in Alaska, $637,350 on 26 loans, 23 of them under 7(a). Fewer offices with larger loans behind them is a pattern a lender will want explained: whether the subject is buying an established patient base or building a new one in a field that has contracted, and whether the price or build-out cost is carried by the practice's own collections.

Between 2019 and 2024 Alaska's population moved from 731,545 to 740,133, and median household income from $75,463 to $95,665. With so little growth in residents, demand growth in an Alaska trade area comes mostly from what each household spends and from visitors, not from new households, and a projection that leans on population growth will be challenged. The table does not show where in the state the residents live; the out-migration and the regional concentration described earlier on this page mean the study has to count households in the subject's own borough or census area.

Gross domestic product went from $54.55 billion in 2019 to $73.63 billion in 2025 and personal income from $44.44 billion to $59.36 billion. Neither row is labelled as adjusted for inflation, and the GDP figure differs from the rounded size of the economy quoted earlier on this page, so a study that cites either should name the series and year. The industry table covers only the restaurant, repair and dental classes, and its source excludes most public-sector and self-employed work, a real gap in a state whose largest sector, as described above, is government. For hotels, breweries and the other classes, and for any trade area where public employment drives demand, the study supplies its own industry and employment evidence.

Industry establishments, employees and payroll in Alaska, by asset class
Asset class (NAICS)Establishments 2018Establishments 2023Employees 2018Employees 2023Annual payroll 2023
Full-service restaurant (NAICS 722511)5765338,6238,365$302.9 million
Limited-service restaurant (NAICS 722513)4534905,9596,951$182.2 million
Automotive mechanical repair (car and truck) (NAICS 811111)1982128811,122$70.5 million
Automotive mechanical repair (car and truck) (NAICS 811112)not published by Census (no row for this code and place: none, or withheld)not published by Census (no row for this code and place: none, or withheld)not published by Census (no row for this code and place: none, or withheld)not published by Census (no row for this code and place: none, or withheld)not published by Census (no row for this code and place: none, or withheld)
Automotive mechanical repair (car and truck) (NAICS 811113)12125140$2.2 million
Automotive mechanical repair (car and truck) (NAICS 811118)472724$1.4 million
Dental office (NAICS 621210)3323152,4772,417$163.9 million

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns 2018 and 2023 (NAICS 2017), through the Census Data API; establishments, March employment and annual payroll; suppressed cells print their flag. Most government and self-employed activity is outside CBP. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "Industry establishments, employees and payroll in Alaska, by asset class", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#economy-industry.

Population and household income in Alaska
Measure20192024
Population731,545740,133
Median household income$75,463$95,665

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-year estimates, 2019 and 2024, through the Census Data API (tables B01003 and B19013). Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "Population and household income in Alaska", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#economy-people.

Output and income in Alaska
MeasureEarlier yearLatest year
Gross domestic product, 2019 and 2025$54.55 billion$73.63 billion
Personal income, 2019 and 2025$44.44 billion$59.36 billion

Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, regional accounts (SAGDP2 all-industry total, current dollars; SAINC1 personal income), through the BEA API. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "Output and income in Alaska", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#economy-output.

Back to the contents

USDA Business and Industry guarantees in Alaska

New USDA B&I guaranteed loan awards for projects in Alaska by fiscal year, and by county, from USAspending; aggregates only.

USDA B&I guarantees in Alaska have moved from many small awards to a few large ones. FY2010 recorded 12 new awards for $3.8 million and FY2011 6 for $2.4 million; FY2022 recorded 3 for $45.0 million and FY2025 4 for $59.2 million, the largest year in the table. FY2015 had the most awards, 13 for $22.2 million. FY2008, FY2018, FY2019 and FY2026 each had fewer than 3 awards, and their face value is withheld, not zero. On this record a B&I guarantee in Alaska now backs a big project, and its study has to carry evidence in proportion.

The series is too lumpy for any single year to describe the program. FY2020 and FY2021 each had 7 awards, for $30.9 million and $14.4 million; FY2023 had 4 for $18.3 million and FY2024 5 for $35.6 million; FY2016 had 7 for $19.4 million and FY2017 10 for $13.0 million. Each award is its own underwriting decision and a few projects move the total, so a sponsor should read neither a quiet year as a closed door nor a large year as an open one, and the study should be scoped to the project rather than to the program's recent pace.

By county, the B&I map of Alaska looks nothing like the SBA map. From FY2015 to FY2026 the Nome census area drew the most awards, 12 for $26.6 million, followed by the Kenai Peninsula with 9 for $29.7 million and Sitka with 6 for $58.3 million, the largest face value of any county. Fairbanks North Star drew 5 awards for $13.8 million. Anchorage, the center of a metro with 724 SBA loans, drew 1 award. B&I reaches where SBA lending thins out, and a B&I study in Alaska is most often a study of a community far from the Anchorage market.

The rest of the county list is long and thin: Dillingham, Juneau and the North Slope with 4 awards each, Matanuska-Susitna and Southeast Fairbanks with 3, Bethel, Ketchikan Gateway, Skagway and Valdez-Cordova with 2, and single awards in Aleutians West, Anchorage, Bristol Bay, Haines, Hoonah-Angoon and Prince of Wales-Hyder. None of these prints a face value, because each rests on fewer than 5 awards. The spread is itself the finding: B&I guarantees have reached places as different as Ketchikan Gateway, Skagway, Bethel and the North Slope, so the program is a realistic route for a rural Alaska project, and the study has to show demand where few comparable operators exist.

The B&I rulebook for these studies sits in 7 CFR Part 5001 and asks for more items than an SBA lender would; USDA work therefore carries a separate price line in our 2026 fee survey. Where a rural Alaska project could be financed either way, the study should be scoped to the program the lender will actually use, since a report written to the shorter SBA standard cannot simply be extended later. These figures are USAspending aggregates and name no recipient; a study cites them as program context, never as a comparable for the subject.

USDA B&I guaranteed loan awards in Alaska by fiscal year
Fiscal yearNew awardsFace value, net
FY20261withheld: fewer than 3 awards
FY20254$59.2 million
FY20245$35.6 million
FY20234$18.3 million
FY20223$45.0 million
FY20217$14.4 million
FY20207$30.9 million
FY20191withheld: fewer than 3 awards
FY20182withheld: fewer than 3 awards
FY201710$13.0 million
FY20167$19.4 million
FY201513$22.2 million
FY20143$3.3 million
FY20139$11.5 million
FY201211$13.0 million
FY20116$2.4 million
FY201012$3.8 million
FY20096$10.4 million
FY20081withheld: fewer than 3 awards

Source: USAspending.gov records of USDA Business and Industry guaranteed loan awards by project state, face value of the loan net of later changes, as compiled in Loan Analytics' USDA tables; a year's dollars are withheld where fewer than 3 awards were touched that year (new awards and later actions together), so a year can show dollars beside 0, 1 or 2 new awards; FY2026 runs through August 31, 2026; aggregates only, no recipient is named. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "USDA B&I guaranteed loan awards in Alaska by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#usda-usda-by-year.

USDA B&I guaranteed loan awards in Alaska by county, FY2015 to FY2026
CountyAwardsFace value
Nome (Ca), AK (FIPS 02180)12$26.6 million
Kenai Peninsula, AK (FIPS 02122)9$29.7 million
Sitka, AK (FIPS 02220)6$58.3 million
Fairbanks North Star, AK (FIPS 02090)5$13.8 million
Dillingham (Ca), AK (FIPS 02070)4fewer than 5 awards
Juneau, AK (FIPS 02110)4fewer than 5 awards
North Slope, AK (FIPS 02185)4fewer than 5 awards
Matanuska-Susitna, AK (FIPS 02170)3fewer than 5 awards
Southeast Fairbanks (Ca), AK (FIPS 02240)3fewer than 5 awards
Bethel (Ca), AK (FIPS 02050)2fewer than 5 awards
Ketchikan Gateway, AK (FIPS 02130)2fewer than 5 awards
Skagway, AK (FIPS 02230)2fewer than 5 awards
Valdez-Cordova (Ca), AK (FIPS 02261)2fewer than 5 awards
Aleutians West (Ca), AK (FIPS 02016)1fewer than 5 awards
Anchorage, AK (FIPS 02020)1fewer than 5 awards
Bristol Bay, AK (FIPS 02060)1fewer than 5 awards
Haines, AK (FIPS 02100)1fewer than 5 awards
Hoonah-Angoon (Ca), AK (FIPS 02105)1fewer than 5 awards
Prince of Wales-Hyder (Ca), AK (FIPS 02198)1fewer than 5 awards

Source: USAspending.gov award records of USDA Business and Industry guarantees (assistance listing 10.768) by place of performance county, face value net, FY2015 through August 31, 2026, aggregated by Loan Analytics; dollars are withheld where fewer than 5 awards stand behind them; no recipient is named. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "USDA B&I guaranteed loan awards in Alaska by county, FY2015 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/alaska-feasibility-study-data#usda-usda-by-county.

Back to the contents

Questions buyers ask

Who writes the feasibility study an Alaska lender will accept?

Loan Analytics writes it for the lender's credit file, independent of both the sponsor and the institution that will hold the loan. The study starts from Alaska's own record on this page, the 1,190 SBA approvals worth $821.0 million that the state drew over FY2017 to FY2026 plus the county-level B&I record, and adds the subject's trade area, its competitors, its cost basis and its projections. The report is addressed to whichever institution carries the loan, a bank, a certified development company or a lender using the USDA guarantee.

Will my Alaska lender insist on a feasibility study?

Only sometimes. SBA leaves it to judgment. The SOP language reproduced in our 2026 fee survey on this site lets the agency ask for a study whenever the kind of business or the market at the site is not well understood, and it names cases such as a crowded local field, a concept new to its market, single-purpose property and a project oversized for its community. Lenders add their own policy, most often on start-ups, new construction and changes of ownership. In Alaska the size test bites hardest outside Anchorage and Fairbanks-College, the only areas with an SBA row on this page. For a USDA B&I loan the same survey lists the study as mandatory for new-business loans over $1 million.

How much does a feasibility study for an Alaska hotel or assisted living facility cost?

Our 2026 fee survey on this site places an Alaska hotel or assisted living study in its complex band, which runs $10,000 to $25,000 for projects of that kind, and puts restaurants, gas stations and RV parks in the single-site band, which runs $5,000 to $12,500. Alaska's hotel and motel class shows 22 SBA loans for $22.2 million over FY2017 to FY2026 and assisted living 15 loans for $18.7 million, both too few for a printed median, so the competing properties have to be verified on the ground rather than read from a loan table, and that fieldwork is part of the fee. The price is set when the scope is.

Can the study fee be rolled into an Alaska SBA loan?

Usually it is. In the arrangement set out by this site's 2026 fee survey, the bank or development company orders the report, which protects its independence, and the borrower covers the bill, just as with an appraisal. Under 7(a), the survey counts a third-party report among the costs loan proceeds can cover; under 504, eligible soft costs sit in the total project cost with the land, building and equipment. Alaska recorded 1,013 7(a) loans for $694.0 million and 177 504 loans for $127.0 million from FY2017 to FY2026, and on either kind the fee normally travels inside the project budget instead of being paid out of pocket.

What sets the timeline for an Alaska feasibility study?

The timeline is stated in the scope response, after Loan Analytics has seen the site, the class and the program; no schedule is quoted before then. Several features of the Alaska record decide it. With 3 or fewer SBA loans in the state for gas stations, self storage or RV parks, the competitive evidence for those classes comes from fieldwork rather than loan data. Sites outside the Anchorage and Fairbanks-College metros have no area row, so demand is built up from the trade area. And a B&I file must satisfy 7 CFR Part 5001 as well, which lengthens the work, so say early which program the lender will use.

Which lenders have the deepest SBA dollar books in Alaska?

Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc. leads with $146.4 million on 138 loans from FY2017 to FY2026, followed by Evergreen Business Capital with $126.6 million on 184 loans. Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC carries $72.8 million on 58 loans and Live Oak Banking Company $49.9 million on 38, books built on fewer, larger loans than KeyBank National Association's 112 loans for $35.8 million or Northeast Bank (ME)'s 25 for $3.2 million. Wells Fargo Bank National Association leads by count with 200 loans and $83.3 million. Every lender's charge-off floor is withheld or under the 30-loan threshold, so none can be quoted.

What size SBA loan is normal for an Alaska project?

The medians on this page answer it best. Across every SBA loan in the Anchorage metro from FY2017 to FY2026 the median was $432,250, and in Fairbanks-College $250,000. By asset class, dental offices print the highest median at $637,350, then automotive repair at $486,500, limited-service restaurants at $350,000 and full-service restaurants at $348,500. Hotels, assisted living, breweries and the other classes have too few loans for a median, though dollar totals such as $22.2 million on 22 hotel loans point to larger loans. A study for an Alaska loan should be measured against the median for its own class and place, not a national average.

Is there enough SBA lending outside Anchorage to support a feasibility study?

Outside Anchorage's 724 loans, only Fairbanks-College has an area row on this page, with 120 loans, $73.7 million and a $250,000 median from FY2017 to FY2026; its charge-off rate is withheld. Juneau, the Kenai Peninsula and the census areas have no SBA area benchmark. That does not stop a study, but it changes how one is built: the lender will expect the evidence to come from the subject's own trade area, its operating competitors and its construction cost, and from the class's record across Alaska and the nation rather than a local loan table. The USDA county table shows B&I awards in places such as Nome, Sitka and the Kenai Peninsula, which a rural study can cite as program context.

Where in Alaska does USDA Business and Industry lending go?

Mostly outside Anchorage. From FY2015 to FY2026 the Nome census area received 12 B&I guaranteed loan awards for $26.6 million, the Kenai Peninsula 9 for $29.7 million, Sitka 6 for $58.3 million and Fairbanks North Star 5 for $13.8 million, while Anchorage received 1. Dillingham, Juneau and the North Slope each received 4, with face values withheld under the 5-award rule. By year, the largest totals are recent: $59.2 million on 4 awards in FY2025 and $45.0 million on 3 in FY2022. These are USAspending aggregates, and no recipient is named.

What does a lender want a feasibility study to prove for an Alaska restaurant?

That the subject will reach its forecast sales in a segment the lender already knows well. Restaurants are Alaska's largest SBA classes, 54 full-service loans for $31.1 million and 39 limited-service loans for $25.5 million, at medians of $348,500 and $350,000. The two segments differ where it counts: full-service establishments fell from 576 in 2018 to 533 in 2023, while limited-service establishments rose from 453 to 490 and the class prints a 12.5% cancellation floor against 2.3% for full-service. A full-service study must explain how the subject gains where its segment shrank; a limited-service study must settle site, terms and budget before approval and show sales from its own trade area.

How does Alaska's SBA loss record compare with other Pacific states?

It is the lowest in the Pacific division on the measure this page prints. Alaska's tracked classes show a 2.1% charge-off floor, against 2.5% in Washington, 2.9% in Oregon, 4.4% in California and 9.2% in Hawaii, and a floor of 0.70% for charge-offs within five years of approval. The Anchorage metro prints 1.6% across all classes. Each figure is a minimum, since open loans have no final outcome yet, and Alaska's rests on a far smaller cohort than its neighbours'. A lender will treat the record as supportive, not as a reason to accept a projection the study has not tested.

Back to the contents

Alaska feasibility study consultant: request a scope

To scope an Alaska study, send Loan Analytics the asset class, the borough or census area of the site, and whether the lender has a 7(a), 504 or B&I structure in mind. Those facts decide which rows of this page the study can stand on: the Anchorage metro's 724 loans, Fairbanks-College's 120, a class row such as dental offices' 26 loans at a $637,350 median, or, for a project in a place like Nome or Sitka, the B&I county record and fieldwork alone. The scope response sets out the work, the timeline and the fee from there.

If a lender is already involved, name it. The lender table shows who carries an Alaska SBA book and at what size, from Wells Fargo Bank National Association's 200 loans to Alaska Growth Capital BIDCO, Inc.'s $146.4 million, and the study is written to the questions that credit desk will put. The scope form on this page is the place to start.

Request Scope & Timeline

Corrections

Figures on this page were checked against SBA's and USAspending's own records and corrected where they differed. Each corrected figure is marked in the text; what it counts and where it comes from:

  1. 84,840: 7(a) plus 504 gross approvals FY2025, cancellations included. Source: SBA loan data as of 2026-09-30.
  2. $45.09 billion: 7(a) gross plus 504 debenture dollars FY2025, cancellations included. Source: SBA loan data as of 2026-09-30.

Start with the data.

Contact Us