Brewery, Winery and Distillery Feasibility Study

The SBA loan record for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) projects nationally and by state, and what a feasibility study for one has to test.

Beverage manufacturing feasibility study consultant

Loan Analytics works as a beverage manufacturing feasibility study consultant for brewers, winemakers and distillers, and for the buyers and developers of their production sites, when a bank or development company asks for outside analysis of the project before committing. Our benchmark for that analysis is the SBA's own loan-level record of beer, wine and spirits lending: 3,278 SBA 7(a) loans for $1.75 billion and 642 SBA 504 loans for $625.4 million to these producers from FY2017 to FY2026, at medians of $250,000 and $620,000. That record also shows credit for this class narrowing. The 152 7(a) approvals of FY2026 are the fewest in any year since FY2010, when there were 115, and the 24 504 approvals are the fewest since that same year. A producer seeking a loan now is one of a shrinking number of files, and each is read closely.

Our study is built around the places where loans in this class have gone wrong. At least 14.4% of 504 approvals and 10.3% of 7(a) approvals were cancelled before they funded, so the study tests the build cost, the equipment quotes and the permit path that decide whether a loan closes at all. The charge-off floors, 3.9% in 7(a) and 2.2% in 504, sit well above the shares lost within 5 years, 1.3% and 0.31%, which suggests that losses kept arriving after the early years; the study therefore carries debt service past the ramp and through the aging cycle that wine and spirits impose. It separates production for distribution from taproom and tasting room sales, values the plant as a lender would have to sell it, and sets the project against the SBA record for its state, metro and lender.

Where the project sits changes the file. California leads the states with 427 loans and $355.6 million, while Texas, with 160 loans, ranks second by dollars at $142.6 million and carries a $460,000 median, far above New York's $161,000. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington alone holds 144 loans. In Kentucky, by contrast, Census counts 7,815 industry jobs and a $562.6 million payroll, yet the SBA record holds 39 loans, with cohorts too small for any loss floor, so the study has to supply the comparables the tables cannot. Each scope is fitted to the program, the lender and the site, and Daniel Smith, MAI reviews and signs every beverage study we deliver.

Request Scope & Timeline

A shrinking 7(a) pipeline

Beer, wine and spirits makers took 3,278 SBA 7(a) loans between FY2017 and FY2026, totaling $1.75 billion with a median of $250,000. The 504 program added 642 loans and $625.4 million, at a median of $620,000. What sets this class apart in its own record is direction: 7(a) approvals fell from 528 in FY2017 to 152 in FY2026, and 504 approvals peaked at 97 in FY2022 before dropping to 24 in FY2026. A borrower today is asking for credit in a category where SBA lending has been contracting for years.

Loss and cancellation floors for producers

The 504 charge-off floor here is 2.2%, for producer loans whose money went out in fiscal 2017 to 2021, and the 7(a) floor is 3.9%. A 504 floor above zero matters, because 504 loans are secured by real estate and equipment; it says some producers failed even with property behind the loan, and recovery on a production building fitted with tanks and lines is uncertain. Cancellation after approval stands at 10.3% in 7(a) and 14.4% in 504, the higher figure on the property side, where construction bids, local approvals and the federal and state production permits all have to line up before funding.

California leads with 427 loans and $355.6 million. New York follows with 251 loans and $105.4 million, then Ohio at 219, Minnesota at 208 and Pennsylvania at 202. Texas shows only 160 loans but $142.6 million, a larger dollar total than New York's. Vermont's 68 loans for $29.3 million equal Missouri's count, and the list closes with Rhode Island and Utah at 26 loans each.

Production, taproom and aging inventory

A study for a brewery, winery or distillery has to separate the two businesses many of these borrowers run: production for distribution and sales on site. Distribution volume depends on wholesaler agreements and shelf placement; on-site revenue depends on taproom or tasting room traffic, event bookings and local rules on hours and direct shipping. Cost must include the brewhouse or still, fermentation and aging vessels, packaging lines, wastewater handling and the permits themselves. For wine and spirits, debt service coverage has to carry the years of aging inventory before product sells, which strains early cash flow. The appraisal needs to value the building for a non-beverage user too, and treat specialized equipment at what it would bring in liquidation.

SBA codes each of these borrowers as a producer of beer, wine or spirits and stops there: nothing in a loan record says whether a taproom, a tasting room or a wedding venue shares the site. Wineries are counted here alongside breweries and distilleries, and no other kind of manufacturing is included.

SBA loan record for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries), United States, FY2017 to FY2026

ProgramLoansDollarsMedian loanCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
SBA 7(a) 3,278$1.75 billion $250,000 10.3% 3.9%
SBA 504 642$625.4 million $620,000 14.4% 2.2%

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries), United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#record-C08.

Cancellation counts FY2017 to FY2024 approvals; charge-off counts FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans to date. Both are floors, and a rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort.

SBA 7(a) beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

0200400600FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 528Loans, FY2018: 450Loans, FY2019: 394Loans, FY2020: 302Loans, FY2021: 354Loans, FY2022: 296Loans, FY2023: 298Loans, FY2024: 257Loans, FY2025: 247Loans, FY2026: 152
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY2017528$227.7 million
FY2018450$197.6 million
FY2019394$162.5 million
FY2020302$149.0 million
FY2021354$254.2 million
FY2022296$192.5 million
FY2023298$187.7 million
FY2024257$139.4 million
FY2025247$142.9 million
FY2026152$100.0 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries), United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#record-C08.

SBA 504 beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

020406080100FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 68Loans, FY2018: 72Loans, FY2019: 71Loans, FY2020: 76Loans, FY2021: 96Loans, FY2022: 97Loans, FY2023: 55Loans, FY2024: 43Loans, FY2025: 40Loans, FY2026: 24
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY201768$46.5 million
FY201872$57.8 million
FY201971$60.9 million
FY202076$59.8 million
FY202196$106.5 million
FY202297$97.9 million
FY202355$70.0 million
FY202443$48.3 million
FY202540$53.4 million
FY202624$24.2 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries), United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#record-C08.

States with the most beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans

StateLoansDollars
California427$355.6 million
New York251$105.4 million
Ohio219$109.3 million
Minnesota208$98.1 million
Pennsylvania202$109.9 million
Washington162$75.2 million
Wisconsin161$91.7 million
Texas160$142.6 million
Michigan146$72.3 million
North Carolina140$106.8 million
Massachusetts120$50.4 million
Illinois113$83.5 million
Oregon111$62.3 million
Colorado108$83.2 million
Florida108$82.4 million
Indiana96$41.0 million
New Jersey92$59.5 million
Virginia92$60.8 million
Georgia87$77.4 million
Missouri68$32.8 million
Vermont68$29.3 million
Connecticut66$36.8 million
Maine55$16.7 million
Maryland48$24.0 million
New Hampshire44$10.1 million
Oklahoma44$15.3 million
Arizona43$37.9 million
Kentucky39$32.9 million
New Mexico36$26.8 million
South Carolina35$30.3 million
Idaho31$12.7 million
Tennessee28$28.2 million
Rhode Island26$12.7 million
Utah26$11.1 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries), United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#record-C08.

Beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) feasibility study data by state

Beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) feasibility study data by metro area

The code says the borrower makes beer, wine or spirits; a taproom, tasting room or event use is not visible. The class holds breweries, wineries and distilleries only; the rest of manufacturing is not in it. Shared code: Wineries are in this class.

Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30.

SBA lending to beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) projects, FY1991 to FY2026

Every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan approved for a beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) project since FY1991, by fiscal year, nationally.

Almost no SBA history before FY2003

Through FY2002 the record holds very little. 7(a) approvals for beer, wine and spirits producers never exceeded 27 in a year, a level reached in FY1995 and again in FY2002, and in most of those years the dollar total is withheld or rests on fewer than 5 loans. The 504 line is thinner still: no measured year before FY2003 shows more than 5 loans, and FY1991, FY1993 and FY2000 are not measured at all, which means too few loans carried a usable industry code, not that none were made. FY2003, with 42 7(a) loans for $10.2 million, is where a steady annual record begins. A lender looking for long-run evidence on how these producers repay will find it mostly among loans approved since FY2010, and a study that leans on the full span from FY1991 would be leaning on years the record cannot measure.

The expansion from FY2010 to FY2016

The class's SBA lending grew in earnest from FY2010. 7(a) approvals went from 66 in FY2009 to 115 in FY2010, 170 in FY2011, 223 in FY2013 and 321 in FY2014, then jumped to 525 in FY2015 and 536 in FY2016, the most of any year on record. Dollars rose from $17.5 million in FY2009 to $249.6 million in FY2015. The 504 line followed more slowly, from 14 loans in FY2010 to 45 in FY2012, 68 in FY2014 and 81 in FY2016, when it carried $67.0 million. The charge-off floors printed on this page start with loans disbursed in fiscal 2017, after the largest approval years, FY2015 and FY2016. A lender with beverage files from FY2015 and FY2016 knows how its own loans from that run have performed, and a new study should expect to be read against them.

Fewer approvals, larger loans

After FY2016 the count and the dollars part ways. FY2021 set the class's 7(a) dollar high, $254.2 million, on 354 loans, against $234.9 million on 536 loans in FY2016. The pattern holds at the end of the series: FY2026's 152 7(a) loans carried $100.0 million, while FY2012's 157 loans carried $64.1 million. FY2026's dollar total is the lowest since FY2012, but its loan count is the lowest since FY2010, so the loans still being made are the larger ones. For a borrower that changes what the study has to prove. The class no longer gives a lender a high volume of small, similar credits to spread risk across; each approval is a larger single bet on one producer's plant, sales channels and inventory cycle, and the study has to stand up as evidence for that one project.

504 moved against 7(a), then fell further

The programs did not move together. From FY2017 to FY2020 the 7(a) count fell from 528 to 302, while 504 approvals rose from 68 to 76; in FY2021 the 504 line reached its dollar peak, $106.5 million on 96 loans, and in FY2022 its count peak of 97. The decline since has been steady: 55 approvals in FY2023, then 43, then 40, and 24 in FY2026, whose $24.2 million is the lowest 504 total since FY2011's $15.4 million. Earlier, from FY2006 to FY2008, 504 dollars ran ahead of 7(a) dollars: $10.1 million against $9.1 million, $18.3 million against $12.6 million, $18.8 million against $10.8 million. Producers with land and a building to finance have leaned on the property-secured program at times, and its fall since FY2022 means a 504 request now arrives with few recent comparables. The study for a 504 project should carry the property case, the budget and the permits in full rather than assume the lender has seen many like it lately.

The FY2017 to FY2026 window holds most of the history

The window this page uses for its state, metro, lender and size tables, FY2017 to FY2026, holds most of the class's SBA lending: 3,278 of the 5,882 7(a) loans since FY1991 and $1.75 billion of $2.74 billion, and 642 of the 1,094 504 loans and $625.4 million of $962.8 million. FY2025 adds one more signal. Both programs carried more dollars on fewer loans than in FY2024: 247 7(a) loans for $142.9 million against 257 for $139.4 million, and 40 504 loans for $53.4 million against 43 for $48.3 million. A credit officer reading a request in FY2026 is therefore benchmarking against a recent, compact record weighted toward larger loans, and the study has to show where the project falls inside that record, not inside the volume of the expansion years.

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) projects by fiscal year
Fiscal yearSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
FY19914fewer than 5 loansnot measurednot measured
FY19927withheld2fewer than 5 loans
FY19934fewer than 5 loansnot measurednot measured
FY199418withheld3fewer than 5 loans
FY199527withheld2fewer than 5 loans
FY199616$1.4 million5$2.4 million
FY199711withheld1fewer than 5 loans
FY199811withheld3fewer than 5 loans
FY199917withheld3fewer than 5 loans
FY200010$2.2 millionnot measurednot measured
FY200112withheld2fewer than 5 loans
FY200227withheld2fewer than 5 loans
FY200342$10.2 million5$2.8 million
FY200454$14.0 million6$3.1 million
FY200549$11.6 million7$6.9 million
FY200650$9.1 million14$10.1 million
FY200769$12.6 million23$18.3 million
FY200863$10.8 million17$18.8 million
FY200966$17.5 million15$11.5 million
FY2010115$33.3 million14$11.9 million
FY2011170$55.1 million28$15.4 million
FY2012157$64.1 million45$28.5 million
FY2013223$101.1 million49$34.9 million
FY2014321$126.4 million68$60.3 million
FY2015525$249.6 million57$40.1 million
FY2016536$234.9 million81$67.0 million
FY2017528$227.7 million68$46.5 million
FY2018450$197.6 million72$57.8 million
FY2019394$162.5 million71$60.9 million
FY2020302$149.0 million76$59.8 million
FY2021354$254.2 million96$106.5 million
FY2022296$192.5 million97$97.9 million
FY2023298$187.7 million55$70.0 million
FY2024257$139.4 million43$48.3 million
FY2025247$142.9 million40$53.4 million
FY2026152$100.0 million24$24.2 million
FY1991 to FY20265,882$2.74 billion1,094$962.8 million
FY2017 to FY20263,278$1.75 billion642$625.4 million

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. A class figure counts the loans whose NAICS code places them in the class; in years when SBA's files leave the code missing or unplaceable for more than one loan in a hundred, the figure is a floor, and where too few loans are coded the year is not measured. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) projects by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#sba-record-sba-by-year.

Back to the contents

Every state ranked for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) lending

SBA loans to beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) projects in each state from FY2017 to FY2026, ranked, with loan size, program split and the cohort floors where at least 30 loans support them.

California, then a close-packed group

California's 427 loans and $355.6 million put it far ahead of every other state; Texas, next by dollars, has $142.6 million. California also has the most 504 loans, 58 beside 369 7(a) loans, and a $350,000 median. Behind it, New York, Ohio, Minnesota and Pennsylvania are bunched between 202 and 251 loans and between $98.1 million and $109.9 million, and Pennsylvania, with the fewest loans of that group, has the most dollars. The depth of the California book means a lender there can set a new winery, brewery or distillery request against many state files. In the states behind it the comparison set is still substantial, but each has its own loan size, from New York's $161,000 median to Minnesota's $261,350, and the study should benchmark the request against its own state's row rather than a national figure.

Ranked by dollars, the order changes

Sort by dollars and the table reorders. Texas rises to second with $142.6 million on 160 loans. North Carolina's 140 loans carry $106.8 million, more than New York's 251 at $105.4 million, and Georgia's 87 loans carry $77.4 million, more than Washington's 162 ($75.2 million) or Michigan's 146 ($72.3 million). The medians explain it. South Carolina ($530,000), Georgia ($522,000), Arizona ($500,000), Colorado ($487,350), North Carolina and Tennessee ($480,500), Florida ($464,500) and Texas ($460,000) all sit far above the class's 7(a) median of $250,000, while New Hampshire ($110,000), Vermont ($152,000), New York ($161,000), Idaho ($167,700), Ohio ($169,000) and Maine ($175,200) sit well below it. A typical request in the first group is large enough to carry real estate or a ground-up plant, and the lender will want a construction budget and a full market case; in the second group the typical loan is closer to equipment, a new line or working capital, and the operating history carries more weight than the projection.

How the program split differs by state

The 504 count does not follow the state rank. Wisconsin has 41 504 loans, second only to California, among 161 loans in all; Minnesota has 35, Florida 32, and Indiana 30, as many as Pennsylvania's 30 on 96 loans against Pennsylvania's 202. At the other end, Georgia's 87 loans include 4 504 loans, Oregon's 111 include 9, New Jersey's 92 include 11 and Colorado's 108 include 13. Where 504 is common, the lender is weighing a loan secured by a production building, and as this page explains, what such a building fetches once it is fitted for brewing or distilling is hard to know; the study should value the plant on what a buyer from outside the industry would pay. Where 504 is rare, as in Georgia and Oregon, the study goes mostly to 7(a) lenders, and its weight shifts to cash flow and the sales channels behind it.

Where approvals fail to fund

Cancellation floors range widely. Florida and South Carolina share the highest, 19.4%, followed by Colorado (16.3%), Illinois (15.3%), Virginia (15.0%) and Arizona (14.7%), all above the national 504 floor of 14.4%. The lowest measured floors are Maryland's 4.8%, Texas's 5.7%, Maine's 5.8%, Washington's 6.0% and Connecticut's 6.3%. Florida stands out: it has more 504 loans (32) than New York (29) and the highest cancellation floor, in line with this page's point that property-side projects have more conditions to meet before funding. For a project in Florida, Colorado, Illinois or Virginia the study should be written as much for the closing as for the credit decision: a firm budget, contractor pricing, the permit sequence and the equipment delivery schedule, so that the lender can see the project funding at the approved amount.

Where loans were charged off

Charge-off floors rank the states differently. Missouri's 8.8% is the highest, then Illinois (8.6%), Georgia (8.5%), Indiana (7.1%), Michigan (6.7%), Massachusetts (6.2%) and California (5.2%), all above the national 7(a) floor of 3.9%, although the state figures pool both programs. Washington, Oregon, New Jersey and Vermont show 0.00%, a floor with no recorded charge-off as of the data date rather than a promise of none, and Pennsylvania shows 0.94%. The measures do not track each other. Missouri cancelled only 7.9% but charged off 8.8%; Colorado cancelled 16.3% and charged off 1.8%; Illinois is high on both. In Colorado the lender's question is whether the project will close; in Missouri and Indiana it is whether the business performs once funded; in Illinois it is both, and the emphasis of the study should follow the state's own record.

States the floors cannot reach

The rate columns go quiet wherever a state's cohort is under 30 loans. Kentucky (39 loans), New Mexico (36), Idaho (31), Tennessee (28), Rhode Island and Utah (26 each) carry medians but no cancellation or charge-off floor, while Maryland, Oklahoma, Arizona and South Carolina show a cancellation figure with the charge-off cell unreported. From Iowa's 23 loans down to Hawaii's 2, no median is printed either. Some of these small books are large in dollars: Alaska's 18 loans total $23.5 million, more than Maine's 55 at $16.7 million, while West Virginia's 10 total $1.1 million. None of those blanks means zero, and a study in these states draws its risk evidence from the class's national floors, the nearest metro with a record and the industry counts in the Census table, and says plainly which of those it relies on.

SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026
StateLoansDollarsMedian loanSBA 7(a) loansSBA 504 loansCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
California427$355.6 million$350,0003695812.1%5.2%
New York251$105.4 million$161,0002222912.9%3.5%
Ohio219$109.3 million$169,0001972211.0%2.3%
Minnesota208$98.1 million$261,3501733510.4%1.7%
Pennsylvania202$109.9 million$250,0001723010.6%0.94%
Washington162$75.2 million$200,000145176.0%0.00%
Wisconsin161$91.7 million$298,000120419.1%1.9%
Texas160$142.6 million$460,000137235.7%3.2%
Michigan146$72.3 million$250,0001291713.1%6.7%
North Carolina140$106.8 million$480,5001162411.0%4.6%
Massachusetts120$50.4 million$200,000912911.8%6.2%
Illinois113$83.5 million$439,400852815.3%8.6%
Oregon111$62.3 million$250,000102911.3%0.00%
Colorado108$83.2 million$487,350951316.3%1.8%
Florida108$82.4 million$464,500763219.4%4.5%
Indiana96$41.0 million$244,50066308.2%7.1%
New Jersey92$59.5 million$350,000811112.2%0.00%
Virginia92$60.8 million$325,150652715.0%2.0%
Georgia87$77.4 million$522,00083412.7%8.5%
Missouri68$32.8 million$287,05052167.9%8.8%
Vermont68$29.3 million$152,00054149.4%0.00%
Connecticut66$36.8 million$325,00054126.3%2.4%
Maine55$16.7 million$175,20045105.8%2.6%
Maryland48$24.0 million$250,0004534.8%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
New Hampshire44$10.1 million$110,00031139.3%3.3%
Oklahoma44$15.3 million$251,0003867.1%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Arizona43$37.9 million$500,00037614.7%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Kentucky39$32.9 million$382,500336not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
New Mexico36$26.8 million$396,0002610not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
South Carolina35$30.3 million$530,00031419.4%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Idaho31$12.7 million$167,700274not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Tennessee28$28.2 million$480,500253not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Rhode Island26$12.7 million$292,500188not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Utah26$11.1 million$304,500206not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Iowa23$9.6 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Kansas22$13.7 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Nebraska21$11.0 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Arkansas20$6.4 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Louisiana20$11.7 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Alaska18$23.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Alabama18$19.4 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Montana17$10.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
South Dakota16$7.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Nevada15$8.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Wyoming11$7.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
West Virginia10$1.1 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Delaware9$4.0 milliontoo few loans for these measures
North Dakota8$1.7 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Mississippi6$844,300too few loans for these measures
Hawaii2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#states-states.

Back to the contents

Metro areas ranked for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) lending

The metropolitan and micropolitan areas with a beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loan record, ranked by SBA loans.

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington leads by a distance

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington has 144 loans, $86.8 million and a $349,000 median, more loans than the statewide totals of North Carolina (140) and every state below it in the state table. Its median sits above Minnesota's statewide $261,350, and the metro reaches into Wisconsin, so its row overlaps both the Minnesota and the Wisconsin rows. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is second by dollars with $69.2 million on 96 loans, ahead of New York-Newark-Jersey City's $63.7 million on 105. A project anywhere in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area is read by lenders who have seen more beverage production files nearby than exist in most states; the study's competitor survey has to account for producers financed from that same book, and its pricing and volume assumptions will be checked against them.

Inside New York and Ohio, size splits by metro

Metro rows show loan size changing within a state. New York's statewide median is $161,000, yet New York-Newark-Jersey City's is $340,000, while Rochester's 45 loans carry $13.9 million at a $100,000 median, the lowest in the metro table and equal to the class's 7(a) lower quartile. Ohio's listed metros are Columbus, with 71 loans at a $183,000 median, Cincinnati with 54 at $317,000 and Cleveland with 36 at $150,000. Cincinnati's 54 loans carry $42.0 million, more than Columbus's 71 ($32.3 million). A study in Rochester or Cleveland is most likely sized against small loans and an operating producer, one in New York-Newark-Jersey City or Cincinnati against larger requests, and in both cases the lender compares the project with the metro row before the state row.

The largest tickets: Dallas, Charlotte, Atlanta, Denver

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington's median, $726,500, is the highest in the metro table and the only one above the class's 504 median of $620,000. Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia follows at $584,050, Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell at $537,700, Denver-Aurora-Centennial at $525,000, Santa Rosa-Petaluma at $508,500 and San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont at $502,400, with Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos and Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater at $500,000. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell holds 54 of Georgia's 87 loans and $49.5 million, so the Atlanta row shapes Georgia's statewide figures. In Texas, Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos leads the metros with 42 loans and $40.6 million, ahead of Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington (30, $34.7 million) and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands (28, $16.4 million, at $295,400). Studies in these metros support requests at the size of a building or a full production fit-out, and the lender's review turns on cost, on whether the market absorbs the output, and on the coverage margin at that loan size.

California's book is spread across its metros

No California metro comes close to Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim leads the state's metros by loans with 61 and $47.9 million; Santa Rosa-Petaluma leads by dollars with $49.2 million on 48 loans; San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad has 52, San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont 47, Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom 39 and Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario 30. The medians run from Sacramento's $267,000 and Riverside's $277,800 to Santa Rosa-Petaluma's $508,500, around the statewide $350,000. California's lead among the states therefore rests on many metros, each with a moderate book, and the SBA record cannot say which of those loans went to wineries and which to breweries or distilleries. A California study has to draw that line itself, from the subject's own market, because the metro row mixes producers whose revenue, inventory and capital cycles differ.

Metro loss floors are almost all withheld

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Cincinnati are the only metros with a printed charge-off floor. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin's 10.2% is the highest loss floor anywhere on this page, above Illinois's statewide 8.6% and the national 7(a) floor of 3.9%; Cincinnati's 0.00% shows no recorded charge-off in its cohort. Every other metro row is withheld, which protects identification and says nothing about performance. Several metros also cross state lines: Providence-Warwick shows 29 loans against Rhode Island's statewide 26, Cincinnati reaches into Kentucky and Indiana, and Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington into New Jersey, Delaware and Maryland. For a Chicago-area project the study meets a lender whose market carries the highest loss floor on this page and who will ask what this project does differently; elsewhere the study has to bring its performance evidence from the state row or the national floors.

SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026
Metro or micro areaLoansDollarsMedian loanCharged off (floor)
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metro Area144$86.8 million$349,000withheld
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ Metro Area105$63.7 million$340,000withheld
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Metro Area97$41.8 million$172,000withheld
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN Metro Area96$69.2 million$387,50010.2%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metro Area90$40.8 million$251,850withheld
Columbus, OH Metro Area71$32.3 million$183,000withheld
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Metro Area71$39.5 million$229,500withheld
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metro Area61$47.9 million$350,000withheld
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metro Area56$30.4 million$250,000withheld
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Area55$39.7 million$315,000withheld
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA Metro Area54$49.5 million$537,700withheld
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Metro Area54$42.0 million$317,0000.00%
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA Metro Area52$42.7 million$342,500withheld
Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN Metro Area51$25.6 million$249,000withheld
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO Metro Area49$41.6 million$525,000withheld
Pittsburgh, PA Metro Area49$32.2 million$300,000withheld
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Metro Area48$49.2 million$508,500withheld
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metro Area47$36.5 million$502,400withheld
Rochester, NY Metro Area45$13.9 million$100,000withheld
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metro Area42$40.6 million$500,000withheld
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metro Area39$20.4 million$312,600withheld
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA Metro Area39$22.4 million$267,000withheld
Portland-South Portland, ME Metro Area38$11.7 million$137,500withheld
Cleveland, OH Metro Area36$14.5 million$150,000withheld
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Metro Area34$32.1 million$584,050withheld
Madison, WI Metro Area34$29.2 million$330,000withheld
Burlington-South Burlington, VT Metro Area33$11.4 million$196,400withheld
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metro Area33$27.5 million$500,000withheld
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Area30$34.7 million$726,500withheld
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metro Area30$27.8 million$277,800withheld
Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI Metro Area29$13.4 million$296,000withheld
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA Metro Area29$13.3 million$285,000withheld
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD Metro Area28$13.5 million$290,000withheld
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX Metro Area28$16.4 million$295,400withheld
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI Metro Area27$9.8 million$203,400withheld
Kansas City, MO-KS Metro Area27$11.0 million$350,000withheld
Oklahoma City, OK Metro Area27$10.3 million$264,400withheld
St. Louis, MO-IL Metro Area27$22.0 million$486,000withheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#metros-metros.

Back to the contents

SBA lenders to beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) projects

The lenders with a recorded book of beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans, ranked; no lender with fewer than 5 loans is listed.

The Huntington National Bank and Live Oak Banking Company

The Huntington National Bank and Live Oak Banking Company hold far larger books than the rest. The Huntington National Bank has the most loans, 203, for $56.5 million; Live Oak Banking Company has 198 loans for $250.7 million, a dollar total larger than any state's except California's $355.6 million. They are also the only lenders in the table with a printed charge-off floor: 5.7% for The Huntington National Bank and 4.1% for Live Oak Banking Company, both above the class's national 7(a) floor of 3.9%. The books describe different lending businesses: one reaches many producers with modest loans, the other writes loans large enough for plant construction or an acquisition. A study going to either lender should expect its assumptions to be set against a beverage book of 203 or 198 loans, and should be written at the depth that book implies.

Small-ticket books

Further down, many books are small in dollars. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company has 164 loans for $33.8 million; KeyBank National Association 61 for $23.8 million; Wells Fargo Bank National Association 61 for $25.3 million; Columbia Bank (OR) 60 for $16.3 million; Banner Bank 38 for $8.3 million; TD Bank, National Association 34 for $4.4 million; Northeast Bank (ME) 29 for $6.0 million; Five Star Bank (NY) 27 for $3.8 million; Eastern Bank 26 for $3.1 million. These sizes match the small medians the state and metro tables show for New York ($161,000), Maine ($175,200), Rochester ($100,000) and Portland-South Portland ($137,500). A request at one of these lenders is most likely an expansion, an equipment line or the purchase of an operating producer, and the study earns its place with a clear reading of the operating record, distribution agreements and on-site sales rather than a long construction analysis.

Fewer files, larger loans

Other lenders write fewer, larger loans. TowneBank has 81 loans for $59.5 million, and WBD, Inc. 38 for $39.8 million, the largest dollar book after Live Oak Banking Company, TowneBank and The Huntington National Bank. Celtic Bank Corporation's 38 loans total $36.9 million, against Banner Bank's $8.3 million on the same count. Byline Bank's 25 loans total $28.3 million, more than Fifth Third Bank's 31 ($22.1 million) or First Commonwealth Bank's 30 ($22.4 million), and United Community Bank (SC) has 26 for $19.5 million. Several names are development or finance corporations rather than banks: Florida First Capital Finance Corporation, Inc. (29 loans, $30.2 million), Empire State Certified Development Corporation (40, $37.2 million), Granite State Economic Development Corporation (42, $29.7 million) and CDC Small Business Finance Corp. (32, $21.5 million). A study for these lenders carries the whole project: the site, the cost, the market and the value of the property outside the beverage use.

Withheld floors, and what to bring instead

Outside The Huntington National Bank and Live Oak Banking Company, every rate in the table is either withheld or not reported because the lender's cohort holds fewer than 30 loans. Newtek Bank, National Association (66 loans), JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (44) and Empire State Certified Development Corporation (40) have enough loans to appear but too few in the measured cohort for a rate. Withheld is not zero, and nothing on this page tells a borrower how any other lender's beverage loans performed. The lender knows, because it holds its own files. The study should therefore be built on the expectation that the lender will place the projection beside its own producer loans, and should show its assumptions for volume, price, distribution share and inventory in a form that allows the comparison line by line.

SBA lenders by beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026
LenderLoansDollarsCharged off (floor)
The Huntington National Bank203$56.5 million5.7%
Live Oak Banking Company198$250.7 million4.1%
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company164$33.8 millionwithheld
TowneBank81$59.5 millionwithheld
Newtek Bank, National Association66$33.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
KeyBank National Association61$23.8 millionwithheld
Wells Fargo Bank National Association61$25.3 millionwithheld
Columbia Bank (OR)60$16.3 millionwithheld
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association44$20.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Granite State Economic Development Corporation42$29.7 millionwithheld
Empire State Certified Development Corporation40$37.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
WBD, Inc.38$39.8 millionwithheld
Banner Bank38$8.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Celtic Bank Corporation38$36.9 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
TD Bank, National Association34$4.4 millionwithheld
CDC Small Business Finance Corp.32$21.5 millionwithheld
Fifth Third Bank31$22.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
U.S. Bank, National Association30$8.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
First Commonwealth Bank30$22.4 millionwithheld
Florida First Capital Finance Corporation, Inc.29$30.2 millionwithheld
Northeast Bank (ME)29$6.0 millionwithheld
Five Star Bank (NY)27$3.8 millionwithheld
United Community Bank (SC)26$19.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Eastern Bank26$3.1 millionwithheld
Byline Bank25$28.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
BayFirst National Bank25$8.3 millionwithheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA lenders by beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#lenders-lenders.

Back to the contents

Loan sizes, program split and cohort floors for beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans

How large beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans run under each SBA program, how they fall into size bands, and how often they were cancelled or charged off.

The programs fund different projects

Set side by side, the 7(a) and 504 quartiles barely meet. 7(a)'s quartile marks sit at $100,000, $250,000 and $600,000. In 504 the lower quartile, $331,500, is above the 7(a) median, and the 504 median, $620,000, is above the 7(a) upper quartile; the 504 upper quartile reaches $1.2 million. A 504 request in this class is typically a building and production fit-out, and the study has to cover cost, permits and the property's value. A 7(a) request can be anything from added fermentation capacity to a full plant, and a beverage study opens by placing the request on that range, because the lender will size its review to the answer.

Count piles up small, dollars pile up large

The 7(a) size bands invert between count and dollars. The band of $150,000 or less has the most loans, 1,331, and the fewest dollars of any band with loans, $101.6 million. The highest band with 7(a) loans has the fewest, 181, and the most dollars, $595.9 million; the band just above $350,000 adds 730 loans and $456.5 million, and the band above it 282 loans and $404.5 million. The top band holds no 7(a) loan at all; the table prints 0 and $0 there. For the study this split is the starting point. A lender treats a request in the smallest band and one in the upper bands as different credits, and the depth of the market, cost and inventory analysis should match the band the request falls in.

504 sits in the middle and alone at the top

The 504 count peaks in the band just above $350,000, with 261 loans and $162.0 million, and only 36 504 loans fall in the smallest band, for $4.1 million; 140 sit in the band over $150,000 to $350,000. The 504 dollars rise with size: $178.6 million on 126 loans in the next band up, $219.5 million on 74 loans in the band below the top, and $27.0 million on 5 loans in the top band, loans larger than any 7(a) approval in the class. The largest beverage production projects SBA financed in this window are therefore 504 projects. A study for one of them is read by a lender sizing a property loan at the top of the class, and it has to show cost, a schedule and the value of a production building at a scale few comparables reach.

Losses arrive late

The program table adds a measure the state rows lack. Only 1.3% of 7(a) loans were charged off within 5 years, against a floor of 3.9% to date; in 504 the figures are 0.31% and 2.2%. Read together, they suggest that much of this class's loss came after the first 5 years rather than soon after funding. This page's own passage on wine and spirits points to one reason a producer can run into trouble later: product that ages for years before it can be sold. A study that tests coverage only through stabilization misses that pattern. Ours carries the downside case through the later years, with the inventory build, the renewal of distribution contracts and the replacement of equipment in view, because that is where the record says the losses have come.

SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026
ProgramLoansDollarsLower quartileMedian loanUpper quartileCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)Charged off within 5 years
SBA 7(a)3,278$1.75 billion$100,000$250,000$600,00010.3%3.9%1.3%
SBA 504642$625.4 million$331,500$620,000$1.2 million14.4%2.2%0.31%

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-programs.

SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals
Loan sizeSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
$150,000 or less1,331$101.6 million36$4.1 million
Over $150,000 to $350,000754$195.0 million140$34.2 million
Over $350,000 to $1 million730$456.5 million261$162.0 million
Over $1 million to $2 million282$404.5 million126$178.6 million
Over $2 million to $5 million181$595.9 million74$219.5 million
Over $5 million0$05$27.0 million

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals", https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-size-bands.

Back to the contents

The beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) industry by state

Establishments, jobs and payroll in the industry codes this asset class covers, state by state, from County Business Patterns.

More producers, fewer SBA loans

County Business Patterns counts 11,127 establishments in the class's industries in 2023, up from 8,695 in 2018, with employment rising from 146,666 to 190,302 and a 2023 payroll of $10.11 billion. Over the same span, SBA 7(a) approvals to the class fell from 450 in FY2018 to 298 in FY2023. The industry grew while SBA lending to it contracted. For a borrower that cuts both ways. A falling SBA count is not evidence of a shrinking market; and a rising establishment count means more producers competing for the same taps, shelves and visitors. A lender will ask how many of those newer producers sell into the subject's market, and the study answers with the trade area's own producers, not the national total.

California, Washington and Oregon

California dominates the Census table as it dominates the loan table: 2,365 establishments, 47,122 employees and $3.36 billion in payroll in 2023, against 427 SBA loans. Washington is second by establishments with 701 and Oregon has 520, yet they carry 162 and 111 SBA loans, fewer than Ohio's 219 or Minnesota's 208, states with 323 and 201 establishments. Oregon's establishments rose from 446 to 520 while its employment barely moved, from 6,127 to 6,180, which suggests more and smaller producers sharing a flat workforce. Both states show a 0.00% charge-off floor. In the Pacific Northwest the competitive analysis is the heavy part of the study: a new producer enters a market crowded with small competitors, and the lender wants to see exactly where the subject's volume will come from.

Kentucky, Tennessee and Missouri: large industries, thin SBA books

Kentucky's 147 establishments employed 7,815 people in 2023, up from 4,269 in 2018, with a $562.6 million payroll, the largest of any state after California and above Texas's $476.2 million. The SBA record there holds 39 loans and $32.9 million, with cohorts too small for a cancellation or charge-off floor. Tennessee shows the same gap: 205 establishments, 5,679 employees (2,674 in 2018) and $310.0 million in payroll against 28 SBA loans. Missouri's $319.7 million payroll stands beside 68 SBA loans and the highest state charge-off floor on the page, 8.8%. In these states the Census table shows a large industry, but a lender has few SBA files of the class to compare. The study fills that gap from the market: the subject's position among the state's producers, its wage and input costs set against the Census payroll, and its sales channels.

Where SBA loans approach the establishment count

Some states show SBA lending close to the size of the industry itself. Minnesota's 208 loans from FY2017 to FY2026 exceed its 201 establishments in 2023; Ohio has 219 loans against 323 establishments, Wisconsin 161 against 215, Vermont 68 against 83 and Massachusetts 120 against 171. Loans are not establishments: one producer can borrow more than once, and a loan can fund a start-up Census had not yet counted. Still, where loans run this close to the number of producers, lenders have likely financed a large part of the local industry and will judge a new request against borrowers they already hold. Michigan and Wisconsin show the contrast plainly: both report a $202.2 million payroll, but Michigan's 318 establishments stand beside 146 SBA loans and 17 504 loans, Wisconsin's 215 beside 161 and 41.

Fast-growing workforces in Texas and the Southeast

Employment rose sharply in several states where SBA loans also run large. Texas went from 382 to 558 establishments and from 5,760 to 8,768 employees, with a $476.2 million payroll and a $460,000 median SBA loan. North Carolina went from 4,130 to 6,556 employees, Georgia from 84 to 179 establishments and South Carolina from 488 to 1,277 employees, and their SBA medians are $480,500, $522,000 and $530,000. South Carolina also carries the highest cancellation floor, 19.4%, shared with Florida, whose employment rose from 3,365 to 4,640. A growing workforce supports the demand side of a projection, but it also signals new capacity arriving, and a lender reading a large request in these states will ask whether the market absorbs the subject's output on top of the producers Census has already added. The study answers with the trade area's producers and their output, not with the state's growth alone.

What the Census table cannot show

Census does not publish every cell. Mississippi and North Dakota are not summed in either year, and Delaware, Nevada, Oklahoma and Rhode Island lack a 2018 total, so their growth cannot be read from this table. County Business Patterns also leaves out most self-employed activity, so the smallest producers, those without payroll, fall outside these counts. Hawaii shows 20 establishments in both years while its employment rose from 270 to 532. Where the table is blank or thin, the study counts the subject's competitors directly, from the federal and state production permits this page names and from fieldwork in the trade area, and says so, rather than filling a gap with an estimate.

Beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) industry establishments, employees and payroll by state
StateEstablishments 2018Establishments 2023Employees 2018Employees 2023Annual payroll 2023
Alabama4150299615$16.0 million
Alaska3756406585$24.0 million
Arizona801021,1281,528$60.2 million
Arkansas3352537984$68.1 million
California2,0892,36544,50347,122$3.36 billion
Colorado3544016,3406,897$399.1 million
Connecticut831317771,543$61.9 million
Delawarenot summed: code 312130 not published by Census25not summed: code 312130 not published by Census356$8.7 million
Florida2133163,3654,640$208.9 million
Georgia841792,5163,549$187.3 million
Hawaii2020270532$22.9 million
Idaho58776011,016$31.0 million
Illinois1982612,7734,091$201.5 million
Indiana1481732,5143,148$122.4 million
Iowa881089911,504$41.1 million
Kansas3053294530$12.2 million
Kentucky971474,2697,815$562.6 million
Louisiana3949473779$29.6 million
Maine901289581,667$81.9 million
Maryland1041501,1542,089$71.7 million
Massachusetts1281712,4553,424$187.1 million
Michigan2593184,5505,141$202.2 million
Minnesota1552012,3103,599$123.8 million
Mississippinot summed: code 312130, 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312130, 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312130, 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312130, 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312130, 312140 not published by Census
Missouri1351663,2694,728$319.7 million
Montana1031089511,092$31.9 million
Nebraska3849314543$11.6 million
Nevadanot summed: code 312130 not published by Census33not summed: code 312130 not published by Census435$16.2 million
New Hampshire61828141,281$81.0 million
New Jersey1261801,7092,225$94.2 million
New Mexico60768511,252$40.4 million
New York4886436,4838,914$391.7 million
North Carolina2743864,1306,556$247.1 million
North Dakotanot summed: code 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312140 not published by Censusnot summed: code 312140 not published by Census
Ohio2353234,2405,791$264.4 million
Oklahomanot summed: code 312140 not published by Census76not summed: code 312140 not published by Census671$18.2 million
Oregon4465206,1276,180$308.6 million
Pennsylvania3715136,5588,904$348.2 million
Rhode Islandnot summed: code 312140 not published by Census39not summed: code 312140 not published by Census465$19.2 million
South Carolina56964881,277$42.1 million
South Dakota2134188293$7.8 million
Tennessee1352052,6745,679$310.0 million
Texas3825585,7608,768$476.2 million
Utah3452380824$30.2 million
Vermont75839021,339$61.5 million
Virginia2933595,2706,822$274.5 million
Washington5937016,8757,914$400.5 million
West Virginia2230120205$4.6 million
Wisconsin1632153,2894,323$202.2 million
Wyoming2223177191$6.9 million
United States8,69511,127146,666190,302$10.11 billion

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns 2018 and 2023 (NAICS 2017), through the Census Data API; establishments, March employment and annual payroll; suppressed cells print their flag. Most government and self-employed activity is outside CBP. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "Beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) industry establishments, employees and payroll by state", https://www.analytics.loan/brewery-winery-distillery-feasibility-study#economy-industry.

Back to the contents

Questions buyers ask

Who can prepare the feasibility study my brewery, winery or distillery lender will accept?

An independent consultant the lender can rely on, with no stake in the project. Loan Analytics prepares studies for beer, wine and spirits producers whether the lender is a bank making an SBA 7(a) loan, a 504 lender, a USDA Business and Industry lender or a conventional bank, with Daniel Smith, MAI as signatory on each. Each study places the project within the SBA record on this page, 3,278 7(a) and 642 504 approvals for producers between FY2017 and FY2026, and within the state, metro and lender rows that apply to it.

Does a bank or development company insist on a study before lending to a brewery or distillery?

Not every lender asks, but the record explains why many do. The class carries a 504 cancellation floor of 14.4%, a 7(a) cancellation floor of 10.3% and charge-off floors of 3.9% and 2.2%, and this page notes that a plant fitted for brewing or distilling may not resell easily. SBA's operating procedure, excerpted in our fee survey for 2026 on this site, also lets the agency request a study where the project property is highly specialized or the market concept is unique, and a production plant with tanks and packaging lines can meet the first of those.

What will a feasibility study for my brewery, winery or distillery cost?

Going by the published provider ranges in the fee survey Loan Analytics released on this site for 2026, a single-site study of a standard special-purpose asset is bracketed at $5,000 to $12,500, while complex work is put at $10,000 to $25,000, a band the survey says covers unusual concepts, multi-site projects and phased construction. A USDA study to 7 CFR Part 5001 belongs to a separate tier: $7,500 at its floor, $18,750 and above at its top. Where a producer's study lands depends on scope: a ground-up plant with a taproom and an aging program takes more work than an expansion of an operating brewery. We quote once the project is scoped.

How long will the study for a beverage plant take?

The timeline is set in the scope we send back, because it depends on the project rather than a standard schedule. What lengthens a beverage study is the work this class needs: a construction budget and equipment quotes for a new plant, separate projections for distribution and on-site sales, an inventory schedule for wine or spirits that age before they sell, and fieldwork on competing producers where the Census or SBA record is thin. A study that must also satisfy USDA's 7 CFR Part 5001 has more ground to cover. Give us the lender's closing date and we will say whether the scope fits it.

Which questions will the credit officer expect a beverage producer's study to answer?

Evidence on the points where this class has failed. Cancellation floors of 14.4% for 504 approvals and 10.3% for 7(a) point to projects that never reached funding, so the lender wants a credible cost, permit and equipment path. The charge-off floors, 3.9% and 2.2%, set against 1.3% and 0.31% within 5 years, point to losses that came after the early years, so the lender wants coverage tested past the ramp and through the inventory cycle. It also wants the plant valued for another user and the revenue split between distribution and sales on site.

Which SBA program do breweries, wineries and distilleries use most?

7(a), by count: 3,278 loans for $1.75 billion from FY2017 to FY2026, against 642 504 loans for $625.4 million. The programs serve different sizes. The 7(a) median is $250,000 and its upper quartile $600,000; the 504 median is $620,000 and its upper quartile $1.2 million, and only 504 shows loans in the top size band, 5 of them for $27.0 million. After California's 58, Wisconsin (41), Minnesota (35) and Florida (32) have the most 504 loans in the class.

How big are SBA loans to breweries, wineries and distilleries?

Modest in 7(a), larger in 504. The 7(a) quartiles are $100,000, $250,000 and $600,000; the 504 quartiles are $331,500, $620,000 and $1.2 million. The smallest 7(a) band, $150,000 or less, holds 1,331 loans, while the most 7(a) dollars, $595.9 million, sit with 181 loans in the highest band 7(a) reaches. Medians vary by state, from New Hampshire's $110,000 to South Carolina's $530,000, and by metro, from Rochester's $100,000 to Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington's $726,500.

How often are SBA loans to beverage producers cancelled before closing?

Approvals made between FY2017 and FY2024 give the cancellation measure: for beer, wine and spirits producers the 7(a) floor is 10.3% and the 504 floor 14.4%. Florida and South Carolina tie at the top of the state list on 19.4%, ahead of Colorado's 16.3% and Illinois's 15.3%, while Maryland, on 4.8%, and Texas, on 5.7%, sit lowest among states with a measured floor. Settling cost, permits and the equipment schedule before the lender commits is how a study answers that risk.

What is the default rate on SBA loans to breweries, wineries and distilleries?

This page reports charge-offs rather than defaults, and as floors. For loans disbursed from FY2017 to FY2021, at least 3.9% of 7(a) loans and 2.2% of 504 loans show a charge-off to date; counted within 5 years, the shares are 1.3% and 0.31%. State floors range from 0.00% (Washington, Oregon, New Jersey, Vermont) to Missouri's 8.8%, and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin's 10.2% is the highest metro floor printed. Any cohort under 30 loans gets no rate, and that blank is never a zero.

Which states have the most SBA lending to breweries, wineries and distilleries?

California, with 427 loans and $355.6 million from FY2017 to FY2026. New York (251), Ohio (219), Minnesota (208) and Pennsylvania (202) follow by count. By dollars Texas is second with $142.6 million on 160 loans, and North Carolina's $106.8 million on 140 loans exceeds New York's total. The state table on this page ranks every state with a record, with its median, program split and floors where the cohort supports them.

Which metro areas see the most SBA loans to beverage producers?

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington leads with 144 loans and $86.8 million, followed by New York-Newark-Jersey City (105), Boston-Cambridge-Newton (97), Chicago-Naperville-Elgin (96) and Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington (90). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is second by dollars, $69.2 million, and carries the only metro charge-off floor above zero, 10.2%. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the largest median, $726,500, and Rochester the smallest, $100,000.

Which banks make SBA loans to breweries, wineries and distilleries?

By count, The Huntington National Bank (203 loans) and Live Oak Banking Company (198) lead, followed by Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (164), TowneBank (81) and Newtek Bank, National Association (66). Live Oak Banking Company's $250.7 million is the largest dollar book. Development corporations also appear, among them Granite State Economic Development Corporation (42 loans) and Empire State Certified Development Corporation (40). The lender table ranks the largest books, none of them under 5 loans.

Is SBA lending to breweries growing or shrinking?

Shrinking since its peak. 7(a) approvals to the class reached 536 in FY2016 and $254.2 million in FY2021; FY2026 recorded 152 loans and $100.0 million. The 504 line reached $106.5 million in FY2021 and 97 loans in FY2022, then fell to 24 loans and $24.2 million in FY2026. Over the same years the Census count of establishments rose from 8,695 in 2018 to 11,127 in 2023, so the contraction is in SBA credit to the class, not in the number of producers.

How does the study handle a taproom, tasting room or event space?

As a separate business with its own projection. The SBA record cannot see it, since each borrower is coded only as a producer of beer, wine or spirits. The study builds on-site revenue from visitor counts, events and what local law allows for serving hours and sales to visitors; it builds distribution revenue from wholesaler and retail placement; and it shows the lender how much of debt service each stream carries, so that a weak season in one does not hide inside the other.

How does a feasibility study treat aging inventory for a winery or distillery?

It schedules the inventory: what is produced each year, how long it ages, when it sells and what it costs to carry in the meantime, and it runs debt service through that period rather than from the first sale. That matters in this class because losses have come late: 1.3% of 7(a) loans were charged off within 5 years, but the floor to date is 3.9%. A brewery's cycle is shorter, and the study says which cycle applies, since the SBA record puts breweries, wineries and distilleries in one class.

My state shows no loss rate on this page. What will the lender rely on?

This page prints a rate for a state only where the cohort behind it reaches 30 loans. Kentucky, New Mexico, Idaho, Tennessee, Rhode Island and Utah have no cancellation or charge-off floor, and every state from Iowa down shows no median either. Missing is not zero. The study then relies on the national floors for the class, the nearest metro with a record and the Census industry counts for the state, such as Kentucky's 147 establishments and $562.6 million payroll, and it states which of those it used.

Can I roll the study fee into my SBA loan?

Our 2026 fee survey, which sits on this site, reports that 504 finances eligible soft costs within the debenture as part of total project cost, and that 7(a) treats third-party report fees as an eligible use of proceeds, so the fee is usually carried as a line of the project budget. The lender commissions it for independence; the cost falls to the borrower. Against a 504 median of $620,000 or a 7(a) median of $250,000 for this class, it is a small entry beside the plant and equipment.

Can the same study serve a USDA Business and Industry lender?

It can be written for one. The USDA tier in our 2026 fee survey, found on this site, covers studies written to 7 CFR Part 5001; its range begins at $7,500 and climbs to $18,750 and above. The tables here are SBA tables, and the record they show for beer, wine and spirits producers, 3,278 7(a) loans and 642 504 loans from FY2017 to FY2026, remains the loan-level evidence on the class, so the study uses it as the benchmark for a USDA request as well.

Does the SBA data separate breweries from wineries and distilleries?

No. This page counts breweries, wineries and distilleries together as one class, with no other manufacturing in it, and neither the state, metro nor lender tables can say whether a loan went to a brewer, a winemaker or a distiller, or whether a tasting room shares the site. So when Santa Rosa-Petaluma's 48 loans or Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington's 144 serve as comparables, the study identifies the producer types in the subject's market itself, from permits and fieldwork.

Back to the contents

Loan Analytics prepares the feasibility study a lender reads before it commits: for a beverage manufacturing (breweries, wineries, distilleries) project anywhere in the United States, financed under SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry or a conventional bank loan. Tell us the project and the lender's deadline, and we reply with scope, timeline and fee.

Request Scope & Timeline

Start with the data.

Contact Us