Dental Office Feasibility Study

The SBA loan record for dental office projects nationally and by state, and what a feasibility study for one has to test.

Dental office feasibility study consultant

Loan Analytics writes dental office feasibility studies for the practice buyers, start-up dentists and lenders who need a plan tested by someone with no stake in it. As a dental office feasibility study consultant we start from the record the credit officer already knows. From FY2017 to FY2026 the 7(a) program approved 7,105 dental loans worth $6.10 billion at a $494,000 median, and 504 approved 1,440 more worth $1.10 billion at a $600,000 median. California's 1,652 loans and $1.53 billion lead the states, and Live Oak Banking Company alone approved 1,157 dental loans for $2.01 billion, more money than California recorded from every lender put together. A dental request is rarely the first file of its kind on the desk that reviews it.

That record also shows where dental credit fails, and each test in our study answers to it. Losses are modest: 7(a) dental loans that disbursed during FY2017 to FY2021 have lost no less than 1.7% to charge-off, with 0.98% charged off inside five years, and the 504 floor is 0.00%. The larger risk is the approval that never funds: at least 12.0% of 7(a) and 16.6% of 504 dental approvals were cancelled. State floors spread wide too, from 0.00% across much of the Midwest to 4.3% in New York, 4.8% in Maryland and 8.3% in Tennessee. So the study tests what those outcomes turn on: the patients a site or practice can hold against the dentists already nearby, the payer mix, collections once the owner dentist draws a market wage, the operatory build-out budget, the seller's exit, and the portion of the price that is goodwill rather than equipment and real estate.

We write every study for a single program and for the credit desk that will review it. Any 7(a) request between the $150,000 lower quartile and the $1.1 million upper quartile reads as another kind of credit than a 504 loan between $362,000 and $985,000 that typically buys or builds the premises, and a Colorado practice at that state's $882,000 median is not judged like a New York one at $302,250. Before we scope the work we set the request against the rows on this page for its state, its metro, its lender and its loan size, so the study answers the questions the lender's own record raises, and it reaches the credit file signed by Daniel Smith, MAI.

Request Scope & Timeline

Practice purchases and the 7(a) program

Dental offices drew 7,105 SBA 7(a) loans across fiscal 2017 to 2026, totaling $6.10 billion with a median of $494,000, and 1,440 SBA 504 loans totaling $1.10 billion with a median of $600,000. The two medians sit fairly close together. A 7(a) loan can buy an existing practice with its equipment and patient base, at a size near what a 504 borrower pays for an office condominium or small building, so the program choice often follows whether real estate is in the deal.

Low 7(a) losses, high 504 cancellations

The 7(a) charge-off floor for dental loans funded in fiscal 2017 through 2021 is 1.7%, and the 504 floor is 0.00%. The more unusual number is cancellation: at least 16.6% of 504 approvals never funded, against 12.0% for 7(a). A 504 dental project typically involves construction or a building purchase, a bank and a certified development company, an appraisal and often a seller or contractor schedule to align, and each of those can push a deal past its commitment.

California leads by a wide margin with 1,652 loans and $1.53 billion; Texas follows with 756 loans and $699.4 million and Florida with 620 and $565.7 million. Colorado's 287 loans carried $362.1 million, a large total for its count, while Utah, with 256 loans, and Idaho, with 119 loans and $113.0 million, rank well up the list. Annual 7(a) volume swung from 1,077 loans in FY2017 to 476 in FY2022, then recovered to 811 in FY2025.

Startup, acquisition and goodwill

For a startup or relocation, a dental feasibility study has to measure the population a new office can draw on, the dentists already serving it, and the payer mix, since fee-for-service, PPO and Medicaid patients produce very different collections. For an acquisition, the study shifts to the practice's own records: active patients, hygiene recall, production by provider, and how much of the revenue depends on the selling dentist staying through transition. Cost should cover operatories, imaging, sterilization and the plumbing and vacuum lines in the build-out. Debt service coverage must be measured on collections, not production, after a market salary for the owner dentist. The appraisal needs to separate practice goodwill from the real estate, because goodwill offers a lender little recovery.

The class is built from the borrower's industry code for dental offices, so it captures practices. An investor who owns a building leased to dentists is coded as a property lessor and does not appear on this page.

SBA loan record for dental office, United States, FY2017 to FY2026

ProgramLoansDollarsMedian loanCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
SBA 7(a) 7,105$6.10 billion $494,000 12.0% 1.7%
SBA 504 1,440$1.10 billion $600,000 16.6% 0.00%

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for dental office, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#record-C20.

Cancellation counts FY2017 to FY2024 approvals; charge-off counts FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans to date. Both are floors, and a rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort.

SBA 7(a) dental office loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

025050075010001250FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 1077Loans, FY2018: 820Loans, FY2019: 621Loans, FY2020: 552Loans, FY2021: 911Loans, FY2022: 476Loans, FY2023: 512Loans, FY2024: 694Loans, FY2025: 811Loans, FY2026: 631
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY20171,077$750.0 million
FY2018820$622.4 million
FY2019621$498.4 million
FY2020552$401.0 million
FY2021911$981.7 million
FY2022476$442.7 million
FY2023512$457.3 million
FY2024694$584.8 million
FY2025811$739.0 million
FY2026631$626.5 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for dental office, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#record-C20.

SBA 504 dental office loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

0100200300FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 146Loans, FY2018: 149Loans, FY2019: 160Loans, FY2020: 169Loans, FY2021: 271Loans, FY2022: 201Loans, FY2023: 88Loans, FY2024: 88Loans, FY2025: 90Loans, FY2026: 78
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY2017146$91.3 million
FY2018149$95.0 million
FY2019160$106.1 million
FY2020169$111.0 million
FY2021271$187.3 million
FY2022201$172.6 million
FY202388$85.4 million
FY202488$89.5 million
FY202590$83.0 million
FY202678$76.8 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for dental office, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#record-C20.

States and other areas with the most dental office loans

State or areaLoansDollars
California1,652$1.53 billion
Texas756$699.4 million
Florida620$565.7 million
New York390$221.7 million
Ohio335$313.7 million
Colorado287$362.1 million
Utah256$195.9 million
Michigan249$212.6 million
Illinois234$130.3 million
New Jersey232$147.1 million
Washington222$177.7 million
Massachusetts212$136.2 million
Georgia206$196.8 million
Arizona201$178.2 million
North Carolina189$183.5 million
Minnesota164$128.1 million
Pennsylvania155$102.8 million
Virginia142$121.5 million
Indiana130$105.5 million
Missouri127$106.3 million
Wisconsin126$117.4 million
Idaho119$113.0 million
Maryland106$68.0 million
Tennessee106$142.1 million
Puerto Rico100$14.3 million
Nevada95$71.7 million
Connecticut92$42.2 million
Oregon91$69.7 million
South Carolina91$64.4 million
Louisiana81$75.6 million
Alabama75$61.9 million
Kentucky69$46.0 million
Kansas61$49.1 million
Oklahoma59$60.5 million
Iowa48$34.0 million
Maine48$33.1 million
New Mexico48$41.8 million
Nebraska47$43.7 million
New Hampshire40$22.1 million
Arkansas39$27.5 million
Rhode Island27$8.7 million
Alaska26$23.6 million
North Dakota25$19.0 million
South Dakota25$26.6 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for dental office, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#record-C20.

Dental office feasibility study data by state

Dental office feasibility study data by metro area

Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30.

SBA lending to dental office projects, FY1991 to FY2026

Every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan approved for a dental office project since FY1991, by fiscal year, nationally.

Fewer loans, far more money per loan

Since FY1991 SBA has approved 31,348 7(a) dental loans for $14.70 billion and 5,977 under 504 for $2.95 billion. The FY2017 to FY2026 decade holds 7,105 of those 7(a) loans but $6.10 billion of the 7(a) dollars: a minority of the approvals and a much larger part of the money. It is the loans that grew, not the count. FY2005 approved 1,245 7(a) dental loans for $401.4 million; FY2020 approved 552 for $401.0 million, almost the same money on far fewer loans, and FY2022 approved 476 for $442.7 million. A study that benchmarks a practice's leverage against the long series would understate the debt lenders now put on a dental practice. The comparable set for a current request is the recent decade, and the coverage test in the study has more debt to carry than the loans of the early series did.

Dental lending held through FY2008 and FY2009

The 7(a) series climbed from 464 loans in FY1991 to 1,059 in FY1995, fell back to 489 in FY2000, and rose again to 1,245 in FY2005. Through the downturn years that followed, dental approvals barely moved: 981 in FY2007, 896 in FY2008 and 890 in FY2009, while 7(a) dollars rose from $314.1 million to $360.6 million in FY2008. 504 dental lending dipped to 289 loans in FY2008, then rose to 337 in FY2009 and 397 in FY2010, the most 504 dental approvals of any year, and 7(a) then reached 1,455 loans in FY2011, its highest count in the table. Approvals record lending, not patient visits, but they show lenders kept financing practices through those years. A dental study's downside case should therefore center on risks particular to the practice, a lost associate, an ended payer contract, a slow ramp after the seller leaves, and less on a collapse in dental credit itself.

FY2021 is not a base year

FY2021 stands out from the whole series: 911 7(a) dental loans for $981.7 million, more 7(a) dollars than any other year in the series, and 271 504 loans for $187.3 million, also the 504 dollar high. FY2022 then dropped to 476 7(a) loans, the fewest of any year since FY1991's 464, though those loans still carried $442.7 million, while 504 held up that year at 201 loans and $172.6 million. A study that describes the market for practice purchases, or how freely lenders finance dentists, should take neither FY2021 as its reference point nor FY2022 as a new normal. FY2025, with 811 7(a) loans for $739.0 million, and FY2026, with 631 for $626.5 million, are the nearer guide to the pace a lender will compare a request with.

504 has shrunk to its FY2000 level

Since FY2022 the 504 series has gone its own way. 504 dental approvals fell from 201 to 88 in FY2023 and stayed down: 88 in FY2024, 90 in FY2025 and 78 in FY2026, the lowest count since FY2000's 65. Each loan is larger than in earlier years: FY2026's 78 loans carried $76.8 million, more than FY2014's $71.8 million on 154. Meanwhile 7(a) recovered, so FY2026 ran 631 7(a) dental approvals against 78 under 504. A dentist who plans to buy or build an office through 504 now joins a much thinner stream than in the FY2007 to FY2011 years, when 504 approved between 289 and 397 dental loans a year. Both the bank and the development company on such a deal will read the study's property case closely: the building's cost against what the practice can pay to occupy it, and what the building is worth if the practice is not there.

Approvals, not fundings

The table counts gross approvals, cancelled ones included, sorted into the class according to the industry code each borrower reported; where SBA left too many codes blank, the source note marks that year as a floor. The series therefore measures dental credit that was approved, not credit that funded: at the class level, at least 12.0% of 7(a) and 16.6% of 504 dental approvals from FY2017 to FY2024 were cancelled. A study that cites the year-by-year counts as evidence of market activity should say what they are, and when it speaks to how dental loans perform it should use the funded cohort and its floors, set out in the loan-size section below, rather than the approval series.

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to dental office projects by fiscal year
Fiscal yearSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
FY1991464$81.3 million14$2.6 million
FY1992632$122.4 million33$5.3 million
FY1993787$158.7 million34$6.8 million
FY1994827$157.1 million63$14.7 million
FY19951,059$193.1 million71$15.3 million
FY1996938$202.6 million133$28.7 million
FY1997911$247.5 million62$13.7 million
FY1998675$163.9 million93$21.5 million
FY1999532$125.8 million100$26.8 million
FY2000489$134.4 million65$17.9 million
FY2001551$154.7 million123$39.7 million
FY2002822$248.1 million116$38.0 million
FY20031,070$297.9 million174$64.6 million
FY20041,194$399.0 million234$92.9 million
FY20051,245$401.4 million255$101.9 million
FY20061,087$389.8 million323$140.9 million
FY2007981$314.1 million378$176.9 million
FY2008896$360.6 million289$130.4 million
FY2009890$336.2 million337$148.1 million
FY20101,276$517.9 million397$177.3 million
FY20111,455$628.1 million351$151.6 million
FY20121,079$470.7 million265$125.0 million
FY20131,073$534.4 million219$102.1 million
FY2014945$497.2 million154$71.8 million
FY20151,182$704.1 million118$60.8 million
FY20161,183$759.1 million136$78.0 million
FY20171,077$750.0 million146$91.3 million
FY2018820$622.4 million149$95.0 million
FY2019621$498.4 million160$106.1 million
FY2020552$401.0 million169$111.0 million
FY2021911$981.7 million271$187.3 million
FY2022476$442.7 million201$172.6 million
FY2023512$457.3 million88$85.4 million
FY2024694$584.8 million88$89.5 million
FY2025811$739.0 million90$83.0 million
FY2026631$626.5 million78$76.8 million
FY1991 to FY202631,348$14.70 billion5,977$2.95 billion
FY2017 to FY20267,105$6.10 billion1,440$1.10 billion

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. A class figure counts the loans whose NAICS code places them in the class; in years when SBA's files leave the code missing or unplaceable for more than one loan in a hundred, the figure is a floor, and where too few loans are coded the year is not measured. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to dental office projects by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#sba-record-sba-by-year.

Back to the contents

Every state ranked for dental office lending

SBA loans to dental office projects in each state from FY2017 to FY2026, ranked, with loan size, program split and the cohort floors where at least 30 loans support them.

California: the deepest record and the 504 market

California's 1,652 dental loans and $1.53 billion lead the table by a wide margin, and its program mix stands apart: 1,264 under 7(a) and 388 under 504, far more 504 dental loans than Florida's 109, the next highest. Its median, $627,000, is higher than the national 7(a) dental median of $494,000, its cancellation floor is 13.2% and its charge-off floor 1.2%. A California request is read against a deep comparable record, by lenders that use both programs for dentists. The study there has to justify the program as well as the project: why a practice that could own its office through 504 is leasing instead, or why a building is being financed under 7(a).

Texas: almost all 7(a), with a higher floor

Texas ranks behind California with 756 loans worth $699.4 million, and nearly all of it is 7(a): 720 loans against 36 under 504, fewer 504 dental loans than Idaho's 41 or Minnesota's 56. The Texas median is $564,450. Its charge-off floor, 2.9%, is the highest of any state with more loans than Arizona's 201 except New York's 4.3%, and it stands well above California and Florida, both at 1.2%. A Texas dental study will nearly always be read by a 7(a) lender, and that lender's state record gives it reason to press on coverage: whether collections hold once the selling dentist's patients start to drift, and whether the payment survives a first year slower than the plan.

Colorado and Tennessee: large loans, opposite outcomes

Colorado's 287 loans place it behind Ohio's 335 on count, yet its $362.1 million trails only California, Texas and Florida, and its $882,000 median is the highest of any state outside South Dakota's $993,000 on 25 loans. Colorado also shows one of the lowest cancellation floors, 6.0%, and a charge-off floor of 1.4%. Tennessee lends large as well, at a $793,600 median, and its 106 loans total $142.1 million against Maryland's $68.0 million on the same count; but Tennessee has the table's highest charge-off floor, 8.3%. Large dental loans performed well in one state and poorly in the other, so loan size alone does not tell a lender how a practice credit will behave. A Tennessee study should expect that floor to be raised directly and should test coverage at the full amount requested, under a downside case that lasts more than a quarter.

The small-median states

At the other end, New York's 390 loans carry $221.7 million at a $302,250 median, less money than Colorado places on 287. Connecticut ($285,900), Kentucky ($263,900) and Rhode Island ($160,000) run lower still, while New Jersey, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania sit at $350,000, Maryland at $343,600 and Maine at $341,600. Several of these small-ticket states carry the highest charge-off floors outside Tennessee: Maryland at 4.8%, Connecticut at 4.5% and New York at 4.3%. Illinois, at a $315,000 median, shows 0.00%, and Kentucky 0.00%. A smaller dental loan is not a safer one by default. In these states the study should establish what the loan actually buys, whether equipment, a partner's share or a small practice, and show that the practice it funds carries the payment on its own collections.

Where 504 carries weight, and where approvals cancel

Outside California, 504 takes a large share of dental lending in Utah (90 of 256 loans), Minnesota (56 of 164), Idaho (41 of 119), Oregon (35 of 91), Nevada (30 of 95), Alabama (27 of 75) and Iowa (21 of 48), and in North Dakota and South Dakota 504 loans outnumber 7(a), 19 to 6 and 16 to 9. Cancellation does not follow that mix. Nevada (4.9%) and Utah (6.6%) show among the lowest floors, with Arizona (5.9%) and Colorado (6.0%); Iowa (23.3%) trails only Maine (23.7%) and New Hampshire (27.0%), and Idaho (17.5%) sits with Connecticut (19.5%), Oklahoma (18.9%) and Massachusetts (18.1%) near the top. In a high-cancellation state the study earns part of its value through timing: if it settles the price, the seller's stay, the lease or the build budget before the lender commits, both sides find a break while the deal can still be repaired.

Zero floors and thin states

A 0.00% charge-off floor is common across the Midwest, in Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana, Missouri and Wisconsin, with Ohio at 0.60%, and appears again in Oregon, South Carolina, Louisiana, Alabama, Kentucky and Oklahoma. Where the cohort holds 30 loans or more, a floor of 0.00% means no charge-off recorded so far, not a promise, and a lender there will still test coverage. Lower in the table, Kansas, Iowa, Maine, New Mexico, Nebraska and New Hampshire have too few loans in the FY2017 to FY2021 cohort for a charge-off rate; the rows from Arkansas to South Dakota report neither rate; and Mississippi, Montana, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, Hawaii and Delaware have too few loans for any of these measures. A dental study in those states cannot rest its case on the state row; it leans on the class floors, the nearest metro row and its own count of competing practices.

SBA dental office loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026
StateLoansDollarsMedian loanSBA 7(a) loansSBA 504 loansCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
California1,652$1.53 billion$627,0001,26438813.2%1.2%
Texas756$699.4 million$564,4507203612.7%2.9%
Florida620$565.7 million$597,30051110913.7%1.2%
New York390$221.7 million$302,2503444610.3%4.3%
Ohio335$313.7 million$500,0003013414.6%0.60%
Colorado287$362.1 million$882,000256316.0%1.4%
Utah256$195.9 million$480,900166906.6%0.72%
Michigan249$212.6 million$460,4002163312.3%0.00%
Illinois234$130.3 million$315,0001983611.9%0.00%
New Jersey232$147.1 million$350,000224814.5%1.1%
Washington222$177.7 million$519,5001734915.1%0.86%
Massachusetts212$136.2 million$350,0001733918.1%0.87%
Georgia206$196.8 million$622,7501812514.6%2.0%
Arizona201$178.2 million$569,000186155.9%1.1%
North Carolina189$183.5 million$700,0001771215.1%0.94%
Minnesota164$128.1 million$542,0001085610.8%0.00%
Pennsylvania155$102.8 million$350,000136198.1%1.4%
Virginia142$121.5 million$504,7501261613.0%1.4%
Indiana130$105.5 million$426,6001082211.8%0.00%
Missouri127$106.3 million$434,0001111615.5%0.00%
Wisconsin126$117.4 million$608,500903611.6%0.00%
Idaho119$113.0 million$545,000784117.5%3.1%
Maryland106$68.0 million$343,60098816.7%4.8%
Tennessee106$142.1 million$793,600100614.3%8.3%
Nevada95$71.7 million$528,30065304.9%1.9%
Connecticut92$42.2 million$285,900791319.5%4.5%
Oregon91$69.7 million$524,000563517.1%0.00%
South Carolina91$64.4 million$546,00085612.0%0.00%
Louisiana81$75.6 million$603,00069127.7%0.00%
Alabama75$61.9 million$447,100482710.9%0.00%
Kentucky69$46.0 million$263,9006547.4%0.00%
Kansas61$49.1 million$425,00053815.9%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Oklahoma59$60.5 million$614,00051818.9%0.00%
Iowa48$34.0 million$529,000272123.3%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Maine48$33.1 million$341,600361223.7%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
New Mexico48$41.8 million$461,60045315.2%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Nebraska47$43.7 million$500,000321510.0%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
New Hampshire40$22.1 million$412,25034627.0%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Arkansas39$27.5 million$569,000336not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Rhode Island27$8.7 million$160,000243not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Alaska26$23.6 million$637,350233not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
North Dakota25$19.0 million$840,000619not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
South Dakota25$26.6 million$993,000916not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Mississippi22$19.0 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Montana22$16.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Vermont20$13.3 milliontoo few loans for these measures
West Virginia18$7.7 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Wyoming15$14.3 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Hawaii14$8.6 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Delaware7$9.3 milliontoo few loans for these measures

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA dental office loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#states-states.

Back to the contents

Metro areas ranked for dental office lending

The metropolitan and micropolitan areas with a dental office loan record, ranked by SBA loans.

Los Angeles outranks every state but two

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim has 654 dental loans and $579.0 million, more loans than any state except California and Texas; Florida, next on the state list, has 620. Its median is $613,000. California fills more of the metro table than any other state: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont (184 loans), San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad (167), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (134), Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom (96) and San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara (94), down to Fresno, Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Santa Rosa-Petaluma and Santa Maria-Santa Barbara. In a metro that has financed this many practices, the question for a start-up is not whether dentists borrow there but whether the chosen corner can draw patients away from the practices already financed around it. The study has to find and count those practices and show the share the new office can take.

New York-Newark, Chicago and Boston: many loans, smaller tickets

New York-Newark-Jersey City has 430 loans and $252.0 million, more than New York State's 390 loans and $221.7 million, because the metro reaches into New Jersey; its median is $340,000. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has 199 loans at a $300,000 median and $98.0 million, the same dollar total Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford reaches on 88 loans. Boston-Cambridge-Newton has 164 loans at a $368,500 median. Chicago and Boston both report a 0.00% charge-off floor, as does San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad. In these metros an ordinary dental request sits in the low hundreds of thousands, so one near Orlando's $748,500 median would stand out. The study then has to explain why this practice needs a loan of that size and show that its collections carry it.

Florida's spread from Miami to Jacksonville

Florida's statewide median of $597,300 hides a wide spread. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, with 212 loans and $160.4 million, lends at a $450,000 median; Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater at $627,500 on 116 loans; North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota at $669,000; Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford at $748,500 on 88; and Jacksonville at $830,000 on 37 loans and $46.4 million. Indiana shows the same kind of gap, Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood at $345,500 against $426,600 statewide. Where a metro row exists, the study benchmarks the request to it rather than to the state: a Miami request measured against the Florida median looks smaller than it is locally, and a Jacksonville one looks larger.

Million-dollar medians on the Front Range and in San Jose

The largest typical dental loans are in Boulder ($1.4 million on 29 loans), Fort Collins-Loveland ($1.4 million on 26) and San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara ($1.0 million on 94), with Jacksonville ($830,000), San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont ($802,000), Denver-Aurora-Centennial ($800,000 on 136 loans and $161.2 million) and Colorado Springs ($765,000) close behind. Fort Collins-Loveland's 26 loans carry $44.8 million, more than Colorado Springs' $42.1 million on 33, and San Jose's 94 carry $127.6 million, more than Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue's $95.2 million on 134. These Colorado metros help explain that state's $882,000 median. At these sizes a lender will read the request as a practice together with its premises, or as a full build-out, and the study must make both the property case and the practice case rather than one alone.

Dallas-Fort Worth: the one reported metro loss floor

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, with 280 loans, $240.0 million and a $572,500 median, is the only metro in the table whose charge-off floor is reported above 0.00%: 3.8%, higher than the Texas figure of 2.9%. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, with 189 loans and $185.8 million, has its floor withheld. Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos ($700,500) and San Antonio-New Braunfels ($708,000) lend larger than Dallas, and El Paso ($350,000) much smaller. A dental study in Dallas-Fort Worth should assume the lender knows that local record, and its downside case should test the payment against collections that stay below plan for a sustained stretch, not a single soft quarter.

Small tickets and withheld floors

The smallest typical loans are in San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas ($100,000 across 77 loans and $11.6 million), Rochester, NY ($120,000) and Charleston-North Charleston ($150,000 on 30 loans, against South Carolina's $546,000 statewide), with Worcester ($229,500) and Providence-Warwick ($272,000) also low. Most metro charge-off floors are withheld, and Ogden, St. Louis, Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek and Buffalo-Cheektowaga have too few loans in the cohort for one. A study cannot quote a metro loss rate the page withholds, so in those metros it relies on the state and class floors, and on the metro's loan count and median to show where the request sits among local dental loans.

SBA dental office loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026
Metro or micro areaLoansDollarsMedian loanCharged off (floor)
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metro Area654$579.0 million$613,000withheld
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ Metro Area430$252.0 million$340,000withheld
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Area280$240.0 million$572,5003.8%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL Metro Area212$160.4 million$450,000withheld
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN Metro Area199$98.0 million$300,0000.00%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX Metro Area189$185.8 million$502,300withheld
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metro Area184$195.2 million$802,000withheld
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA Metro Area167$142.4 million$575,5000.00%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Metro Area164$110.0 million$368,5000.00%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Area161$120.8 million$454,500withheld
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ Metro Area151$129.8 million$539,000withheld
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA Metro Area150$148.3 million$617,750withheld
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO Metro Area136$161.2 million$800,000withheld
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metro Area134$110.6 million$575,850withheld
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metro Area134$95.2 million$509,000withheld
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metro Area116$108.5 million$627,500withheld
Salt Lake City-Murray, UT Metro Area114$85.9 million$498,500withheld
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metro Area110$75.8 million$394,050withheld
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metro Area109$97.1 million$478,000withheld
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metro Area106$80.0 million$546,000withheld
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA Metro Area96$92.7 million$636,000withheld
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metro Area94$127.6 million$1.0 millionwithheld
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL Metro Area88$98.0 million$748,500withheld
Columbus, OH Metro Area81$81.8 million$650,000withheld
San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metro Area77$77.5 million$708,000withheld
San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas, PR Metro Area77$11.6 million$100,000withheld
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metro Area76$82.5 million$700,500withheld
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Metro Area76$71.4 million$573,400withheld
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Metro Area72$67.3 million$727,950withheld
Kansas City, MO-KS Metro Area69$47.7 million$425,000withheld
Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN Metro Area61$41.6 million$345,500withheld
Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV Metro Area60$43.5 million$503,500withheld
Boise City, ID Metro Area59$65.4 million$639,000withheld
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Metro Area58$64.2 million$657,500withheld
Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT Metro Area58$53.1 million$513,500withheld
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN Metro Area54$76.1 million$742,400withheld
Cleveland, OH Metro Area49$47.9 million$437,000withheld
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA Metro Area41$19.3 million$272,000withheld
Pittsburgh, PA Metro Area39$19.4 million$324,000withheld
Ogden, UT Metro Area38$31.2 million$549,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Fresno, CA Metro Area37$36.6 million$525,000withheld
Jacksonville, FL Metro Area37$46.4 million$830,000withheld
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metro Area37$30.7 million$503,300withheld
Rochester, NY Metro Area37$9.0 million$120,000withheld
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD Metro Area36$22.6 million$342,600withheld
St. Louis, MO-IL Metro Area36$34.1 million$605,200not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Birmingham, AL Metro Area34$25.8 million$480,000withheld
Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI Metro Area34$35.2 million$698,500withheld
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Metro Area34$26.0 million$548,500withheld
Colorado Springs, CO Metro Area33$42.1 million$765,000withheld
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH Metro Area33$40.6 million$715,000not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA Metro Area33$38.4 million$509,400withheld
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI Metro Area32$41.7 million$651,250withheld
Albuquerque, NM Metro Area31$29.8 million$500,000withheld
Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metro Area30$10.4 million$150,000withheld
Boulder, CO Metro Area29$40.7 million$1.4 millionwithheld
Tucson, AZ Metro Area28$30.3 million$569,200withheld
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY Metro Area27$15.7 million$319,700not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
El Paso, TX Metro Area27$14.8 million$350,000withheld
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO Metro Area26$44.8 million$1.4 millionwithheld
Tulsa, OK Metro Area26$31.0 million$696,400withheld
Worcester, MA Metro Area26$14.6 million$229,500withheld
New Orleans-Metairie, LA Metro Area25$26.2 million$419,800withheld
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL Metro Area25$25.3 million$669,000withheld
Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC Metro Area25$22.3 million$335,700withheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA dental office loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#metros-metros.

Back to the contents

SBA lenders to dental office projects

The lenders with a recorded book of dental office loans, ranked; no lender with fewer than 5 loans is listed.

Live Oak Banking Company's dental book

Live Oak Banking Company approved 1,157 dental loans for $2.01 billion over FY2017 to FY2026, more loans than any state but California and more dollars than any state at all, California's $1.53 billion included. The Huntington National Bank comes next at 502 loans and $402.3 million. Live Oak's charge-off floor is withheld on this page and is given no number here. For a dentist, this concentration means the request may well be read by a credit team that has seen more dental files than most state markets have produced. The study for that reader should be built from the practice's own production and collection records and from measures a dental lender recognizes, the operatory count, the hygiene schedule, the active patient base and the owner's pay, rather than from general small-business ratios.

The banks behind Live Oak

The Huntington National Bank (502 loans, $402.3 million), Wells Fargo Bank National Association (464, $365.4 million), Bank of America, National Association (246, $151.0 million) and U.S. Bank, National Association (223, $153.5 million) all report a 0.00% charge-off floor. With 256 loans, United Midwest Savings Bank National Association carries $302.8 million, far more than Bank of America or U.S. Bank on a similar count, and its floor is withheld. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association is the exception among reported floors: 3.8% on 194 loans that total $60.0 million, fewer dollars than The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation places on 74. Among the floors this table reports, the only one above 0.00% belongs to a small-ticket book, so the coverage test belongs in the study of a modest dental loan as much as in one for a building.

Ticket size shows what a lender finances

Books of similar count differ widely in size. United Community Bank (SC) made 175 dental loans for $192.1 million, more money than Bank of America on 246, while BayFirst National Bank made 159 for $35.4 million. Fifth Third Bank's 108 loans total $171.4 million and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company's 113 total $126.4 million; Northeast Bank (ME)'s 122 total $21.3 million and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company's 70 total $12.8 million. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (58 loans, $5.5 million), Eastern Bank (41, $5.7 million), Lendistry SBLC, LLC (33, $6.1 million) and Citizens Bank, National Association (41, $7.1 million) run smaller still. A book of $5.5 million across 58 loans is not financing whole practices with their buildings, while one of $192.1 million across 175 can be. Matching the request to the lender's own ticket is part of scoping, and the study is pitched to the kind of dental credit that lender usually reads.

The development companies on the 504 side

Names that identify a development company carry a visible part of the 504 lending here, led by The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation (74 loans, $77.1 million, 0.00% floor), CDC Small Business Finance Corp. (72, $49.1 million, 0.00%), California Statewide Certified Development Corporation (63, $45.8 million), Florida Business Development Corporation (60, $39.3 million), Bay Area Employment Development Company (57, $42.4 million), Empire State Certified Development Corporation (44, $38.6 million), Twin Cities-Metro Certified Development Company (30, $21.7 million) and Granite State Economic Development Corporation (27, $11.7 million). California and Florida, the largest 504 dental states at 388 and 109 loans, each have such names in the table. A 504 dental project brings a bank and a development company to the same file, and the study must satisfy both readers: the practice's cash flow for one, the building and the project budget for the other.

Lenders newer to the class

Several sizable books hold too few dental loans in the charge-off cohort, FY2017 to FY2021 disbursements, to support a rate: Newtek Bank, National Association (180 loans), Northeast Bank (ME) (122), Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (70) and UMB Bank, National Association (64). With fewer than 30 of their dental loans in that cohort, most of these approvals sit outside that window or never funded, so much of each book is recent. A lender newer to dental credit has less of its own history to judge a request by, and it will lean harder on the study's market evidence: the patient base, the competing practices nearby, and the comparable loans in the state, metro and size-band rows of this page.

SBA lenders by dental office loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026
LenderLoansDollarsCharged off (floor)
Live Oak Banking Company1,157$2.01 billionwithheld
The Huntington National Bank502$402.3 million0.00%
Wells Fargo Bank National Association464$365.4 million0.00%
United Midwest Savings Bank National Association256$302.8 millionwithheld
Bank of America, National Association246$151.0 million0.00%
U.S. Bank, National Association223$153.5 million0.00%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association194$60.0 million3.8%
Newtek Bank, National Association180$75.5 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
United Community Bank (SC)175$192.1 millionwithheld
BayFirst National Bank159$35.4 millionwithheld
PNC Bank, National Association148$116.0 millionwithheld
Readycap Lending, LLC132$82.2 millionwithheld
TD Bank, National Association129$51.4 millionwithheld
Northeast Bank (ME)122$21.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company113$126.4 millionwithheld
Fifth Third Bank108$171.4 millionwithheld
Mountain West Small Business Finance78$48.4 millionwithheld
Celtic Bank Corporation77$27.6 millionwithheld
The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation74$77.1 million0.00%
CDC Small Business Finance Corp.72$49.1 million0.00%
Zions Bancorporation, National Association71$28.7 millionwithheld
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company70$12.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
BMO Bank National Association68$54.4 millionwithheld
UMB Bank, National Association64$36.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
California Statewide Certified Development Corporation63$45.8 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Business Finance Capital63$59.7 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Florida Business Development Corporation60$39.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico58$5.5 millionwithheld
Bay Area Employment Development Company57$42.4 millionwithheld
Florida First Capital Finance Corporation, Inc.57$42.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
SouthState Bank, National Association51$37.0 millionwithheld
Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC51$36.4 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Ameris Bank50$42.2 millionwithheld
Evergreen Business Capital48$33.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Empire State Certified Development Corporation44$38.6 millionwithheld
Eastern Bank41$5.7 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Citizens Bank, National Association41$7.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
WBD, Inc.34$28.3 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Lendistry SBLC, LLC33$6.1 millionwithheld
Columbia Bank (OR)32$10.2 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Byline Bank32$35.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
First Bank of the Lake32$32.8 millionwithheld
Santander Bank, National Association31$9.6 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Twin Cities-Metro Certified Development Company30$21.7 millionwithheld
Citizens Bank (TN)30$38.5 millionwithheld
Colony Bank30$24.3 millionwithheld
Truist Bank29$12.1 millionwithheld
Enterprise Bank & Trust28$27.1 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Granite State Economic Development Corporation27$11.7 millionnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort
Banc of California26$27.6 millionwithheld
Oriental Bank26withheldwithheld
Capital Matrix, Inc.25$18.6 millionwithheld

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA lenders by dental office loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#lenders-lenders.

Back to the contents

Loan sizes, program split and cohort floors for dental office loans

How large dental office loans run under each SBA program, how they fall into size bands, and how often they were cancelled or charged off.

7(a) reaches lower and higher than 504

The 7(a) quartiles run from $150,000 to $1.1 million around a $494,000 median; 504's run from $362,000 to $985,000 around $600,000. 7(a) reaches lower than 504 at the bottom and higher at the top, and the middle half of 504 loans sits inside the middle half of 7(a). For a dental borrower, 7(a) covers the whole range of practice credit, from an equipment package or a small purchase to a large acquisition with its building, while 504 occupies a narrower band where the premises are the point. The first job of the study is to locate the request within that spread, since a lender reads a $150,000 7(a) loan and a $985,000 504 loan as different kinds of dental credit with different questions attached.

856 loans hold the most money

Counted by loans, 7(a) dental lending is broad: 2,080 loans in the band over $350,000 up to the million-dollar mark, 1,836 at $150,000 or less, 1,180 between those two, and 1,153 in the band just past the million-dollar mark. Counted by dollars, the top populated band leads: its 856 loans hold $2.66 billion, against $1.64 billion in the band below it and $1.34 billion in the band with the most loans. The 1,836 smallest 7(a) loans hold $153.6 million, less than the $170.2 million that 504's 64 loans in the top populated band carry. No dental loan in either program falls in the table's highest band: 0 loans and $0. A lender's dental 7(a) exposure is set by its largest loans, and a request in the upper bands is where the study's market and coverage evidence will be read most closely.

504 is a mid-sized property loan

504 dental lending gathers in one band: 750 loans and $466.2 million over $350,000 up to the million-dollar mark, with 282 loans and $378.6 million in the band above and 295 loans and $77.1 million in the band below. Only 49 dental loans under 504, worth $5.8 million, are $150,000 or less. A 504 request at that small end is unusual and invites the question of why it is in 504 at all; one near the $600,000 median is the program's ordinary dental case. There the study's weight falls on the property: what it costs to buy or build, what the practice pays to occupy it, and what it is worth to the lender as collateral if the practice falters.

Losses that arrive after year five

Measured on the FY2017 to FY2021 cohort, 7(a) dental charge-offs reach a floor of 1.7% to date but 0.98% inside five years, which places a meaningful part of the losses later in the loans' lives. The 504 floor is 0.00%, both overall and within five years. For a 7(a) study, the projection should not stop at the first years after a purchase. The risks that surface later for a dental practice, patients drifting once the seller's transition period ends, an associate leaving, chairs and imaging due for replacement, a lease renewing at a higher rent, belong in the horizon the lender sees. For 504, the 0.00% figure is a floor on the measured cohort, not a forecast, and the study still has to show that the practice, not the building, makes the payment.

Cancellation is the commoner failure

In both programs the cancellation floor far exceeds the charge-off floor: 12.0% against 1.7% in 7(a), and 16.6% against 0.00% in 504. For a dental borrower, the likelier way a financing fails is before the money moves, not after. A study can reduce that exposure when it is scoped early: it tests the purchase price against collections before the lender commits, it prices the operatory build-out from a contractor's bid rather than an allowance, and it puts the seller's transition terms and the landlord's consent into the case. A lender that sees those questions settled in the study has fewer reasons to withdraw its commitment later.

SBA dental office loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026
ProgramLoansDollarsLower quartileMedian loanUpper quartileCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)Charged off within 5 years
SBA 7(a)7,105$6.10 billion$150,000$494,000$1.1 million12.0%1.7%0.98%
SBA 5041,440$1.10 billion$362,000$600,000$985,00016.6%0.00%0.00%

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA dental office loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-programs.

SBA dental office loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals
Loan sizeSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
$150,000 or less1,836$153.6 million49$5.8 million
Over $150,000 to $350,0001,180$316.7 million295$77.1 million
Over $350,000 to $1 million2,080$1.34 billion750$466.2 million
Over $1 million to $2 million1,153$1.64 billion282$378.6 million
Over $2 million to $5 million856$2.66 billion64$170.2 million
Over $5 million0$00$0

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA dental office loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals", https://www.analytics.loan/dental-office-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-size-bands.

Back to the contents

Questions buyers ask

Who prepares a feasibility study for a dental practice loan?

A party with nothing riding on the practice, whose findings a credit officer can take at face value. Loan Analytics prepares dental office studies whether the money comes through a USDA Business and Industry guarantee, SBA 7(a) or 504, or a conventional loan from the bank, and every one goes out under the signature of Daniel Smith, MAI. Each study begins from the dental record on this page, 7,105 7(a) loans and 1,440 504 loans approved over FY2017 to FY2026, then narrows to the state, metro and lender where the request will be read, so the lender can see where this practice falls among the dental loans its peers have already made.

Does a bank have to see a feasibility study before it finances a dental practice?

Not automatically. The fee research this site posted for 2026 explains that SBA treats a study as discretionary and may ask for one on certain facts, among them market saturation by industry type and location, an unusual concept, highly specialized property, or a project out of scale with its community; banks commission studies on their own initiative too, start-ups being the usual case. For dentists, saturation is the live question in the busiest markets: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim alone has 654 dental loans on this page. A start-up, a relocation into a crowded trade area or a building purchase sized well above the state median are the requests most likely to bring the question.

How much does a dental office feasibility study cost?

Dental offices have no tier of their own in the 2026 fee survey we published, so the fee is set once the study is scoped. The survey's published tiers frame it. One SBA site with a standard asset: $5,000 to $12,500. Complex SBA projects, meaning several sites, an unusual concept or construction in phases: $10,000 to $25,000. Written to 7 CFR Part 5001 for a USDA lender, a dental study would fall in a tier that begins at $7,500 and climbs beyond $18,750. Buying an operating practice with its collection history usually takes less work than a start-up with none, and a project that joins a practice purchase to a building or a full build-out takes more.

Can the study's fee go into the dental loan itself?

In most cases, yes. Per this site's 2026 fee survey, 504 counts eligible soft costs inside the project total that the debenture finances, and 7(a) proceeds may pay third-party report fees, so the study usually appears as a line in the project budget rather than as a separate check. The same survey points out that SBA does not fix or limit the fee, and that the lender commissions the study for independence while the borrower bears the cost, much as with the appraisal. For a dental purchase near the $494,000 7(a) median, the fee is one of several third-party costs inside the same loan.

How long does a dental feasibility study take?

That depends on the scope, which is why we set the timeline with the scope rather than quote one in advance. Our 2026 fee survey names the things that stretch a study: additional sites; new construction, with a budget to review and a ramp counted from completion; franchise concepts; a USDA overlay; and sparse rural markets where the competition has to be checked on foot. For a dentist the largest variable is usually whether the practice already exists. An acquisition with collection records and a patient list is read largely from documents, while a start-up or a relocation needs the trade area, the competing practices and the ramp built from fieldwork. Order the study early enough that the appraisal and the commitment do not wait on it.

What will the lender test when I am buying a dental practice?

Whether the practice's collections, not its production, carry the new debt once the buyer pays a dentist's market wage, and whether those collections survive the seller's exit. The study works from the practice's own records: the active patient base, recall and hygiene volume, production by provider, the payer mix and the share of revenue tied to the selling dentist. It sets the price against what those collections support, and it keeps goodwill apart from equipment and any real estate, since a lender recovers little from goodwill. With 1,836 7(a) dental loans at $150,000 or less and 856 between $2 million and $5 million, dental 7(a) loans span a wide range, and the depth of the test scales with the loan.

What does a feasibility study for a dental start-up have to prove?

That there are patients for one more office at that address. The study draws the trade area the office can serve, counts the population and the dentists already practicing in it, and weighs the payer mix, because fee-for-service, PPO and Medicaid patients pay very differently. It builds the ramp month by month to the point where collections cover the payment and a market wage for the dentist, and it checks the build-out budget, from chairs and cabinetry to imaging, sterilization and the air and suction lines behind the walls. In a metro with a deep record, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington with 280 dental loans or Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler with 151, the competing practices are many, and the study must name them rather than estimate them.

Should my dental office loan be 7(a) or 504?

Dentists have split 7,105 7(a) loans against 1,440 under 504 over FY2017 to FY2026. As this page's own analysis explains, the choice often turns on whether the deal includes the building, since 7(a) can finance a practice purchase with its equipment and patients while a 504 dental project usually means buying or building the office. The programs sit at different sizes, 7(a) from a $150,000 lower quartile to a $1.1 million upper quartile and 504 from $362,000 to $985,000, and they fail in different ways: 504 approvals were cancelled at a floor of 16.6% against 12.0% for 7(a), while 504 shows a 0.00% charge-off floor against 1.7%. Whichever program the lender picks, the study is written to its terms.

Which lenders make the most SBA dental loans?

On this page's FY2017 to FY2026 record, Live Oak Banking Company leads with 1,157 dental loans and $2.01 billion. Behind it come The Huntington National Bank (502 loans, $402.3 million) and Wells Fargo Bank National Association (464, $365.4 million); then, with 256 loans and $302.8 million, United Midwest Savings Bank National Association; then Bank of America, National Association (246, $151.0 million) and U.S. Bank, National Association (223, $153.5 million). Of the lenders named as development companies, the largest dental books belong to The Mortgage Capital Development Corporation (74) and CDC Small Business Finance Corp. (72). No lender with fewer than 5 dental loans is listed, and a withheld charge-off floor is never given a number.

Where are SBA dental office loans concentrated?

California leads with 1,652 loans and $1.53 billion. Texas comes next with 756 loans and $699.4 million, Florida with 620 loans and $565.7 million, New York with 390 loans and $221.7 million, and Ohio with 335 loans and $313.7 million. Colorado's 287 loans carry $362.1 million, more than New York or Ohio. Among metros, Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim (654 loans), New York-Newark-Jersey City (430), Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington (280), Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach (212) and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin (199) lead. At the bottom, Mississippi, Montana, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, Hawaii and Delaware each record too few dental loans to support a median or either floor, and a study there relies more on fieldwork than on the state record.

How often are SBA dental loans charged off?

Rarely, on the record so far. For dentists' 7(a) loans first funded from FY2017 through FY2021, at least 1.7% have now ended in charge-off, 0.98% of the cohort inside five years of funding; for dentists' 504 loans of those same years the floor is 0.00%. These are floors on cohorts of 30 loans or more, not forecasts. The spread by state is wide: Tennessee shows 8.3%, Maryland 4.8%, Connecticut 4.5% and New York 4.3%, while Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota and a number of other states show 0.00%. Among metros, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington reports 3.8%. A lender in a state with a high floor will put more weight on the study's downside case.

How often do approved dental loans get cancelled before funding?

More often than they are charged off. At least 12.0% of 7(a) and 16.6% of 504 dental approvals from FY2017 to FY2024 were cancelled. By state the floor runs from 4.9% in Nevada and 5.9% in Arizona to 23.7% in Maine and 27.0% in New Hampshire. A cancellation costs the borrower the time and the third-party fees already spent. A study ordered early, and scoped to settle the price, the seller's transition, the lease or the build budget before the commitment, lets both sides see a problem while the deal can still be changed.

What size loan do dentists usually get through SBA?

The 7(a) median is $494,000, and its quartiles sit at $150,000 and $1.1 million; the 504 median is $600,000, with quartiles of $362,000 and $985,000. State medians range from $160,000 in Rhode Island and $263,900 in Kentucky to $882,000 in Colorado and $993,000 in South Dakota, and metro medians from $100,000 in San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas to $1.4 million in Boulder and in Fort Collins-Loveland. The size-band table shows no dental loan above $5 million in either program. The study benchmarks a request to the narrowest row that has one: the metro first, then the state.

Does the feasibility study replace the appraisal or the practice valuation?

No; each answers a different question. The fee survey (2026) on this site sets out the SBA triggers: a licensed or certified appraiser's report once a loan above $500,000 is backed by commercial property, and a business valuation by an independent party when ownership changes and the financing, net of the appraised property and equipment, tops $250,000. It quotes published prices of $2,500 to $7,500 for an ordinary appraisal and $1,800 to $7,000 for a valuation. In a dental purchase, what the financing covers beyond appraised property and equipment is the practice's goodwill, which is exactly what that test measures. The feasibility study asks whether the practice can carry the loan; it draws on the valuation's allocation but does not stand in for it.

Is a study required if the dental office is financed with a USDA guarantee?

Our 2026 fee survey reports that USDA makes the study mandatory on new-business loans over $1 million, that the study follows 7 CFR Part 5001, whose requirements run longer than SBA's discretionary list, and that published fees for this tier start at $7,500 and pass $18,750. Loan Analytics prepares dental studies to that standard as well as to SBA's. This page carries no USDA loan record for dentists; its tables are SBA 7(a) and 504 only, so a USDA dental study must draw its market evidence from the trade area and from fieldwork, using the SBA dental rows only as a benchmark for loan size and outcomes.

Is a dental building owned by an investor counted on this page?

No. Loans enter this class by the borrower's own industry code, so a loan appears here when the borrower is the dental practice itself. A landlord that buys or builds an office to lease to dentists borrows under a property lessor code and falls outside these tables. That matters for the study you need: a practice that owns its office through 504 is in this record, among the 1,440 504 loans from FY2017 to FY2026, while an investor's medical office is underwritten on its rent roll and leases, a different study from the one this page describes.

What should I send to get a dental feasibility study scoped?

The address or trade area; which kind of project it is, start-up, purchase, relocation or expansion; the number of operatories; whether the building is part of the deal; the program and lender if you have them; the amount you plan to borrow; and the lender's due date for the report. For a purchase, the practice's recent collections and patient counts help us size the work, and for a build, the contractor's budget does. We read the request against this page's rows, the state median and floors, the metro row, the lender's dental book and the size band, before we reply with scope, timeline and fee.

Does it matter which lender my dental loan goes to?

It shapes what the study must emphasize. Lenders' dental books differ in size: United Community Bank (SC) made 175 dental loans for $192.1 million, BayFirst National Bank 159 for $35.4 million. A lender with large tickets is more likely to see a request as a practice with its premises; a book of small tickets points to equipment or partial purchases. Newtek Bank, National Association (180 loans) and Northeast Bank (ME) (122) report no charge-off rate because too few of their dental loans fall in the measured cohort, which marks much of their dental lending as recent; they have less history of their own to lean on and more need of the study's evidence. We scope each study to the lender that will read it.

Back to the contents

Loan Analytics prepares the feasibility study a lender reads before it commits: for a dental office project anywhere in the United States, financed under SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry or a conventional bank loan. Tell us the project and the lender's deadline, and we reply with scope, timeline and fee.

Request Scope & Timeline

Start with the data.

Contact Us