Urgent Care Feasibility Study
The SBA loan record for urgent care and ambulatory surgery projects nationally and by state, and what a feasibility study for one has to test.
Daniel Smith, MAI
Urgent care and ambulatory surgery feasibility study consultant
Loan Analytics works as the urgent care and ambulatory surgery feasibility study consultant whose report a lender can place straight into its credit file: an independent study of a walk-in clinic, a surgery center or a freestanding emergency facility, built against the SBA's own loan-level record for the class. That record is why lenders ask for one. Between FY2017 and FY2026, SBA lenders approved 273 7(a) loans for $311.4 million and 37 504 loans for $54.5 million in this class. No fewer than 14.0% of this class's FY2017 through FY2024 approvals under 7(a) were cancelled before a dollar was drawn, and the 504 floor for those approval years is 29.0%, so a real slice of approved clinic and surgery projects never reached funding. Of the 7(a) clinic and surgery loans that funded during FY2017 through FY2021, no fewer than 2.5% have since been charged off. A credit officer holding those floors wants the visits, the surgical cases, the payer contracts and the licensing settled on paper before the loan funds, and our study is where that proof is assembled.
The study begins by placing the request inside the record. The middle 7(a) loan in the class is $687,000 and the middle 504 loan is $1.4 million, yet the 7(a) loans spread from a lower quartile of $200,000 to an upper quartile of $1.6 million, and the 7(a) tier sized over $2 million to $5 million alone holds 49 loans carrying $170.2 million. Texas leads the states with 44 loans for $74.1 million, California follows with 38 for $58.7 million and Florida with 37 for $45.5 million, while one metro, New York-Newark-Jersey City, earns a row of its own at 31 loans. From there we set out what a lender in this class needs proven: which of the three formats the project is, the visits or cases its trade area can supply, reimbursement by payer, the competing urgent care centers, surgery centers, hospital departments and retail clinics, the physicians and owners committed to the project, the licenses it must hold before opening, a build-out and equipment budget drawn from quotes, staffing for the hours or cases planned, and debt service coverage through the ramp and beyond the fifth year.
We draft each report to the financing in play, be it an SBA 7(a) or 504 guarantee, USDA backing through Business and Industry, or a clinic loan a bank carries entirely on its own account. A request near the $200,000 lower quartile calls for a narrower scope than a ground-up surgery center in the top occupied band, and a 504 project, whose lower quartile of $722,000 already sits above the 7(a) median, carries a different proof again. Daniel Smith, MAI signs the conclusion. The Request Scope & Timeline form takes the address, the clinic format, who will practice or operate there, the financing route and the day your lender expects the report; back comes the scope, a calendar fitted to that due date, and our fee.
Request Scope & Timeline
Several clinic types under one code
This class mixes urgent care centers, ambulatory surgery centers and freestanding emergency rooms, because all of them share one industry code, and the loan files cannot tell them apart. Across FY2017 to FY2026, 7(a) approved 273 loans in the class for $311.4 million, at a median of $687,000, and 504 approved 37 for $54.5 million, at a median of $1.4 million. A borrower planning one of these formats should not assume the class median describes it, since a walk-in clinic and a surgery center are very different projects.
A cancellation floor to plan around
The 504 cancellation floor is 29.0%, a striking share of approvals from FY2017 to FY2024 that never funded; under 7(a) it is 14.0%. We publish no 504 charge-off rate for this class, since fewer than 30 of its loans sit in that cohort, while 7(a) loans disbursed in fiscal 2017 to 2021 show a 2.5% floor. Surgery and emergency projects depend on licensing, physician syndication and payer contracts that must all come together, and an approval made before they do is at risk.
Texas leads with 44 loans and $74.1 million, then California with 38 and $58.7 million and Florida with 37 and $45.5 million; no other state qualifies for the table. Annual 7(a) dollars peaked in FY2021, at $57.2 million on 34 loans, and slowed to $19.7 million on 20 loans in FY2026, while 504 approved no loans at all in FY2024. The 504 program's busiest years were FY2017 and FY2021, with 8 loans each, worth $8.2 million and $11.3 million.
Visits, cases and payer contracts
For urgent care, a study needs to estimate daily visits from the population, its insurance coverage and the existing urgent care, retail clinics, primary care offices and emergency rooms within a short drive, along with the reimbursement per visit each payer pays. For ambulatory surgery, demand comes from the surgeons who will bring cases, their specialties and current hospital volumes, and the ownership and syndication plan that keeps them committed. A freestanding emergency center adds state licensing and the question of in-network status. Cost covers the build-out, imaging, surgical equipment and staffing for the clinical hours offered. Coverage should be tested on a visit or case ramp and a payer mix the market supports. The appraisal must consider how the space would serve a general medical user if the operator left.
SBA loan record for urgent care and ambulatory surgery, United States, FY2017 to FY2026
| Program | Loans | Dollars | Median loan | Cancelled (floor) | Charged off (floor) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBA 7(a) | 273 | $311.4 million | $687,000 | 14.0% | 2.5% |
| SBA 504 | 37 | $54.5 million | $1.4 million | 29.0% | not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort |
Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for urgent care and ambulatory surgery, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#record-C16.
Cancellation counts FY2017 to FY2024 approvals; charge-off counts FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans to date. Both are floors, and a rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort.
SBA 7(a) urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans approved nationally, by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Loans | Dollars |
|---|---|---|
| FY2017 | 32 | $32.0 million |
| FY2018 | 31 | $25.1 million |
| FY2019 | 28 | $31.0 million |
| FY2020 | 12 | $10.0 million |
| FY2021 | 34 | $57.2 million |
| FY2022 | 25 | $32.9 million |
| FY2023 | 33 | $37.2 million |
| FY2024 | 33 | $40.1 million |
| FY2025 | 25 | $26.4 million |
| FY2026 | 20 | $19.7 million |
Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for urgent care and ambulatory surgery, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#record-C16.
SBA 504 urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans approved nationally, by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Loans | Dollars |
|---|---|---|
| FY2017 | 8 | $8.2 million |
| FY2018 | 2 | $2.8 million |
| FY2019 | 5 | $8.1 million |
| FY2020 | 3 | $7.5 million |
| FY2021 | 8 | $11.3 million |
| FY2022 | 1 | $3.1 million |
| FY2023 | 4 | $4.6 million |
| FY2024 | 0 | $0 |
| FY2025 | 2 | $3.0 million |
| FY2026 | 4 | $6.0 million |
Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for urgent care and ambulatory surgery, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#record-C16.
States with the most urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans
| State | Loans | Dollars |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 44 | $74.1 million |
| California | 38 | $58.7 million |
| Florida | 37 | $45.5 million |
Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for urgent care and ambulatory surgery, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#record-C16.
Urgent care and ambulatory surgery feasibility study data by state
- Urgent care and ambulatory surgery feasibility study in Texas
- Urgent care and ambulatory surgery feasibility study in California
- Urgent care and ambulatory surgery feasibility study in Florida
Urgent care and ambulatory surgery feasibility study data by metro area
Mental health and addiction treatment centers share their industry codes and cannot be separated. Shared code: Urgent care, ambulatory surgery and freestanding emergency centers share 621493.
Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30.
SBA lending to urgent care and ambulatory surgery projects, FY1991 to FY2026
Every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan approved for a urgent care and ambulatory surgery project since FY1991, by fiscal year, nationally.
Countable only from FY2001
Although the long table's first row is FY1991, its rows up to FY2000 print not measured in all four columns: too few loans in SBA's files from the 1990s carry an industry code that could place them in this class. Counting therefore begins in FY2001, at 13 7(a) loans and 3 under 504. The grand totals, 748 7(a) loans for $587.6 million and 100 504 loans for $108.4 million, are in effect totals from FY2001 onward. Where a year's files leave too many loans uncoded, that year's class count is a floor, and the early years are the likeliest to understate. A study that quotes this history should keep the same caution in its own pages: the table proves a minimum of lending, and the true figure may exceed it but cannot fall short of it.
The busiest years came before FY2017
The busiest 7(a) years in the measured record are FY2016, with 59 loans, FY2015 with 51, and FY2013 with 46. The count then fell to 32 in FY2017 and has not climbed back since: the highest year of the decade that followed is FY2021, at 34. Measured by approvals, the decade from FY2017 is quieter than the run of years just before it, and a lender who remembers a busier urgent care and surgery pipeline is remembering FY2013 to FY2016. For a feasibility study the point is practical. Clinics and surgery centers financed during that earlier run may still be operating in the trade areas a new project will enter, and a study that counts competitors from an old directory or a stale listing can miss them. The competitive survey has to be taken as the market stands on the date of the study, provider by provider.
Fewer loans, larger loans
Where the long table prints 7(a) dollars, the growth in loan size is plain to see. FY2007 approved 25 loans for $10.0 million and FY2008 approved 23 for $11.3 million. FY2012 approved 31 for $16.4 million. FY2017 approved 32 for $32.0 million, FY2019 approved 28 for $31.0 million, and FY2021 approved 34 for $57.2 million, a peak no other printed 7(a) year matches. FY2024 approved 33 for $40.1 million, more money than FY2013's $35.8 million on 46 loans. Taken whole, the decade since FY2017 holds 273 of the 748 7(a) loans in the record but $311.4 million of its $587.6 million: the smaller part of the approvals and the larger part of the dollars. For a lender this means the modern request in this class is a project loan, and project loans draw project questions: can the trade area fill a bigger facility with visits or cases, does the construction and equipment budget cover everything the opening needs, and does debt service stay covered through the months before volume arrives.
The swing from FY2020 to FY2026
Inside the decade, 7(a) approvals dropped to 12 in FY2020, the lowest count since FY2003, and then rose to 34 in FY2021, the year with the record's largest printed 7(a) dollars. The next three years ran at 25, 33 and 33 before easing to 25 in FY2025 and 20 in FY2026. The files do not explain these swings, and a study should not invent an explanation for them. What a lender can take from the pattern is that approvals in this class move sharply from one year to the next, so a single strong year is no evidence that a given market can absorb another facility. The study answers that question for the subject's own trade area, from the visit or case volume that area can support and the operators already competing for it, rather than leaning on a national count this changeable.
The 504 column
Under 504 the class is a small line: 100 loans for $108.4 million across the record, beside 748 under 7(a). No measured year carries more than 8 loans under 504, a level reached in FY2007, FY2017 and FY2021, and FY2024 carries none at all. The printed years show the same drift toward size seen under 7(a). FY2007's 8 loans came to $6.8 million, FY2017's 8 to $8.2 million and FY2021's 8 to $11.3 million; FY2012's 5 loans came to $3.2 million and FY2019's 5 to $8.1 million. FY2013 stands out early, with 6 loans for $10.7 million. The decade since FY2017 holds 37 of the 100 504 loans and $54.5 million of the $108.4 million. With no more than 8 approvals nationally in any measured year, few lenders will have handled a 504 clinic or surgery file of their own, and the study must bring the comparison set that a lender's own portfolio cannot.
Reading not measured, fewer than 5 loans and withheld
Three labels in the long table need care. Not measured marks the years before FY2001, when the files cannot place loans in the class. Fewer than 5 loans, in the 504 dollar column, keeps the loan count visible while hiding the money, so no dollar value on this page rests on a handful of loans. Withheld in the 7(a) dollar column appears in exactly the years where the 504 column carries that small-group label, a guard that keeps the small 504 figure from being worked out by subtraction. None of these labels means zero; the true zeros, such as FY2024's 0 loans and $0 under 504, are printed as zeros. Our study quotes each cell the way this table prints it and leaves a withheld year blank instead of estimating it, so a credit reviewer laying the study beside this page meets identical figures and identical gaps.
| Fiscal year | SBA 7(a) loans | SBA 7(a) dollars | SBA 504 loans | SBA 504 dollars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY1991 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1992 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1993 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1994 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1995 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1996 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1997 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1998 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY1999 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY2000 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| FY2001 | 13 | withheld | 3 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2002 | 15 | $4.9 million | 7 | $4.8 million |
| FY2003 | 9 | withheld | 3 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2004 | 14 | withheld | 2 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2005 | 22 | withheld | 1 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2006 | 26 | withheld | 3 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2007 | 25 | $10.0 million | 8 | $6.8 million |
| FY2008 | 23 | $11.3 million | 7 | $5.5 million |
| FY2009 | 24 | withheld | 3 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2010 | 41 | withheld | 4 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2011 | 40 | withheld | 2 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2012 | 31 | $16.4 million | 5 | $3.2 million |
| FY2013 | 46 | $35.8 million | 6 | $10.7 million |
| FY2014 | 36 | withheld | 2 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2015 | 51 | withheld | 4 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2016 | 59 | withheld | 3 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2017 | 32 | $32.0 million | 8 | $8.2 million |
| FY2018 | 31 | withheld | 2 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2019 | 28 | $31.0 million | 5 | $8.1 million |
| FY2020 | 12 | withheld | 3 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2021 | 34 | $57.2 million | 8 | $11.3 million |
| FY2022 | 25 | withheld | 1 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2023 | 33 | withheld | 4 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2024 | 33 | $40.1 million | 0 | $0 |
| FY2025 | 25 | withheld | 2 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY2026 | 20 | withheld | 4 | fewer than 5 loans |
| FY1991 to FY2026 | 748 | $587.6 million | 100 | $108.4 million |
| FY2017 to FY2026 | 273 | $311.4 million | 37 | $54.5 million |
Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. A class figure counts the loans whose NAICS code places them in the class; in years when SBA's files leave the code missing or unplaceable for more than one loan in a hundred, the figure is a floor, and where too few loans are coded the year is not measured. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to urgent care and ambulatory surgery projects by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#sba-record-sba-by-year.
Every state ranked for urgent care and ambulatory surgery lending
SBA loans to urgent care and ambulatory surgery projects in each state from FY2017 to FY2026, ranked, with loan size, program split and the cohort floors where at least 30 loans support them.
Three states with full measures
Only three rows, Texas, California and Florida, are deep enough to carry a median, the 7(a) and 504 split and the outcome floors. Texas ranks first with 44 loans for $74.1 million, California second with 38 for $58.7 million and Florida third with 37 for $45.5 million. The state rows account for every loan in the national count, and while the three leaders hold a large share of the class's dollars, most of its loans were made elsewhere, across a long list of states with a few approvals each. For a study, the leading three are the only places where an in-state comparison with medians and floors is possible. Everywhere else the subject is measured against the national record printed on this page and against the evidence of its own trade area.
Medians above the class's 7(a) middle
All three state medians clear the $687,000 7(a) median for the class: California at $1.2 million, Texas at $1.1 million and Florida at $800,000. None reaches the 504 median of $1.4 million. Program mix may lift California's figure, since 12 of its 38 loans are 504 loans, more than Texas's 4 and Florida's 5 combined, and California alone holds 12 of the class's 37 504 loans. Texas reaches $1.1 million with 40 of its 44 loans under 7(a), so its median rests mainly on large 7(a) requests rather than on 504. A lender in Texas or California is used to clinic and surgery requests well above the national middle, and the study there has to show that a large facility's budget matches what its trade area can fill, not merely that the request looks like its peers.
Cancellation sets Texas and Florida apart
The cancellation floors divide the leaders. Texas prints 10.3%, below the class's 7(a) floor of 14.0%. Florida prints 22.6%, well above it, even though 32 of Florida's 37 loans are 7(a) loans. California shows no cancellation floor, because its cohort is under the 30 loans a rate requires, and no state prints a charge-off floor at all. For a Florida project the record says approvals in this class have fallen away before funding more often than the class norm, and the study should be built to close that gap: a license in hand or on a dated path, site control, physician or provider commitments in writing, and payer contracting under way before the lender is asked to close. In Texas the same items matter, but the state's record gives its lenders less reason to expect an approved file to unwind.
The next tier: New Jersey to Arizona
Below the leaders, New Jersey has 24 loans for $24.0 million, Georgia and New York 15 each, North Carolina 14 and Arizona 13. The dollars do not follow the counts. Arizona's 13 loans carry $26.0 million, more than New Jersey's 24 loans and more than any state outside the leading three. North Carolina's 14 carry $18.2 million, while Georgia's 15 carry $10.5 million and New York's 15 carry $14.1 million. Rows of this size print no median or floor, but they still tell a lender whether a large request is ordinary in its state. In Arizona a large clinic or surgery request joins a record of large approvals; in Georgia, where the same number of loans as New York carries less money, the study has to explain the subject's size from its own budget and demand rather than from the state's record.
Western states against the Northeast and Midwest
The same divide shows further down the table. Utah's 8 loans carry $12.4 million and Nevada's 7 carry $10.3 million, while Michigan's 7 carry $3.7 million, Illinois's 9 carry $7.1 million, and Maryland and Pennsylvania, with 11 each, carry $6.8 million and $8.5 million. Ohio's 5 loans carry $2.0 million. Arizona, Utah and Nevada form a western group where this class borrows large amounts on few loans, while Michigan, Illinois, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Ohio lend to the class in smaller amounts. In the western group a credit officer will hold the request up against large peers. In the Northeast and Midwest the officer's first question is likely to be why this subject borrows more than the state's loans in the class have tended to carry, and the study should answer it with the format, the equipment and the cases or visits the larger budget is meant to serve.
States with a handful of loans, or none
Below Ohio every row holds 4 loans or fewer: Indiana, Nebraska and Virginia have 4 each; Arkansas, Colorado, Kentucky, Maine and Rhode Island 3; Alabama, Connecticut, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Washington 2; and Idaho, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Wisconsin and West Virginia 1. Iowa, Mississippi and Montana, among others, have no row at all. In these states a lender has almost no in-state SBA history for the class to lean on, and a study cannot manufacture one. It measures the subject against the national floors on this page and builds the rest from the trade area itself: the population and payers within reach, the competing providers counted directly, the referral sources, and the physicians or operator who will carry the project through its ramp.
| State | Loans | Dollars | Median loan | SBA 7(a) loans | SBA 504 loans | Cancelled (floor) | Charged off (floor) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 44 | $74.1 million | $1.1 million | 40 | 4 | 10.3% | not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort |
| California | 38 | $58.7 million | $1.2 million | 26 | 12 | not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort | not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort |
| Florida | 37 | $45.5 million | $800,000 | 32 | 5 | 22.6% | not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort |
| New Jersey | 24 | $24.0 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Georgia | 15 | $10.5 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| New York | 15 | $14.1 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| North Carolina | 14 | $18.2 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Arizona | 13 | $26.0 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Maryland | 11 | $6.8 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Pennsylvania | 11 | $8.5 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Illinois | 9 | $7.1 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Utah | 8 | $12.4 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Michigan | 7 | $3.7 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Nevada | 7 | $10.3 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Ohio | 5 | $2.0 million | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Indiana | 4 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Nebraska | 4 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Virginia | 4 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Arkansas | 3 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Colorado | 3 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Kentucky | 3 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Maine | 3 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Rhode Island | 3 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Alabama | 2 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Connecticut | 2 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Louisiana | 2 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Minnesota | 2 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| New Hampshire | 2 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Tennessee | 2 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Washington | 2 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Idaho | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Kansas | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Massachusetts | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Missouri | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| New Mexico | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Oklahoma | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Oregon | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| South Carolina | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| South Dakota | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| Wisconsin | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures | ||||
| West Virginia | 1 | fewer than five loans | too few loans for these measures |
Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#states-states.
Metro areas ranked for urgent care and ambulatory surgery lending
The metropolitan and micropolitan areas with a urgent care and ambulatory surgery loan record, ranked by SBA loans.
One metro area qualifies
Of all the metro and micro areas, only New York-Newark-Jersey City has a row for this class: 31 loans for $32.0 million, at a median of $550,000. Its 31 loans exceed the count of every state except Texas, California and Florida, and its $32.0 million exceeds both New Jersey's $24.0 million and New York's $14.1 million. Most of the loans in the New Jersey and New York rows sit inside this one metro, so for those two states the metro row comes close to being the whole story. A lender in northern New Jersey or the New York boroughs is reading a request in the one place in the country where this class has gathered densely enough to be measured as a metro.
The lowest median on the page
The metro's median of $550,000 is the lowest median this page prints for any geography: below the class's 7(a) median of $687,000, below Florida's $800,000, and well below Texas's $1.1 million and California's $1.2 million. The metro that borrows most often in this class is therefore not where its largest loans are made. A lender reading a New York area request will compare it with smaller peers than a lender in Texas or California would, and a request well above $550,000 has to be justified by the project itself, whether that is a surgery suite, imaging, an emergency format or owned real estate, rather than by the region's lending pattern. The study should state plainly which of those drives the budget, so the lender is not left to guess why the request sits above its local middle.
Why the leading states have no metro row
Texas has 44 loans and California 38, both more than the New York area's 31, yet no metro in either state, or in Florida, has a row. Their lending is spread across metro areas and smaller places, none of which gathered the class the way the New York area did. For a study this changes what counts as a local comparison. In the New York area a lender can read the subject against a metro record; in a Texas, California or Florida metro, no metro cell carries that record, so the study has to assemble its own picture of the trade area, provider by provider and payer by payer, and set it beside the state's medians and floors.
A withheld charge-off figure
The metro row withholds its charge-off figure. That is not a zero, and it should be read neither as a clean record nor as a poor one. A lender in the New York area therefore works from the class-wide figures: 2.5% of 7(a) loans that funded across FY2017 through FY2021 charged off to date, 0.85% within 5 years, and cancellation floors of 14.0% under 7(a) and 29.0% under 504. The study's task is to show where the subject sits against those floors, by testing its coverage at the visit or case volume that a cautious reading of its own neighbourhood supports.
What a New York area study has to settle
In a metro where the class borrows often and in smaller amounts, the questions a lender asks turn on competition and space more than on size. How many urgent care centers, surgery centers, hospital outpatient sites and retail clinics already serve the subject's immediate neighbourhood; whether the lease runs as long as the loan; which payers dominate in that neighbourhood and what they reimburse; and whether the space could be let to another medical tenant if the clinic closed. With 31 approvals in the metro over the decade, the competitive survey cannot stop at a radius drawn on a map. It has to name the providers the subject's patients would otherwise use.
| Metro or micro area | Loans | Dollars | Median loan | Charged off (floor) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ Metro Area | 31 | $32.0 million | $550,000 | withheld |
Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans by metro area, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#metros-metros.
Loan sizes, program split and cohort floors for urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans
How large urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans run under each SBA program, how they fall into size bands, and how often they were cancelled or charged off.
Two programs, two shapes
Under 7(a), the class's loans spread from a lower quartile of $200,000 through a median of $687,000 to an upper quartile of $1.6 million. Under 504 they sit in a tighter range: $722,000, $1.4 million and $1.9 million. Even the 504 lower quartile, $722,000, clears the 7(a) median, so most 504 loans in this class are larger than the middle 7(a) loan. A study written for a 504 request should expect its lender to compare the project with a band of sizable peers. One written for 7(a) has to say first where in a wide spread the request sits, because a loan near $200,000 and one near $1.6 million are different credits that happen to share a class.
Count against money in the 7(a) bands
The 7(a) size bands separate the count from the money. The most crowded 7(a) tier runs over $350,000 to $1 million, with 66 loans for $44.8 million, and close behind it come the class's 60 loans of $150,000 or less, worth $4.8 million. Loans sized over $2 million to $5 million number only 49 yet carry $170.2 million, more than all the smaller bands together. Over $1 million to $2 million holds 57 loans for $80.7 million, and over $150,000 to $350,000 holds 41 for $11.0 million. The class has no 7(a) loan above $5 million. The bulk of 7(a) money in this class therefore sits in a minority of large loans, so what a lender has at stake here is concentrated in the large project requests where it most needs the evidence a feasibility study supplies.
The small end of the 7(a) record
The two smallest bands hold 60 and 41 loans but only $4.8 million and $11.0 million. These loans are a real part of the class, and the lower quartile of $200,000 sits among them. A loan of that size is a different request from a surgery center build-out. The study for it asks what the loan pays for, whether that use earns its payments from visits the clinic can document, and whether the payer contracts it relies on are already in place. Scoping a small request as if it were a ground-up facility wastes the borrower's fee; scoping a large one as if it were small leaves the lender's real questions unanswered. Placing the request in its band is the first step of our scope.
The 504 bands
The 504 side of the class has no loan of $150,000 or less and nothing above $5 million. Over $150,000 to $350,000 holds 2 loans, too few for a dollar figure. Loans sized over $1 million to $2 million form the program's center for this class, 16 of them for $24.2 million, ahead of the 11 loans for $7.4 million sized over $350,000 to $1 million. The top occupied band holds 8 loans, and its dollars are withheld so that the smaller band's figure cannot be derived; they are not zero and should not be estimated. A 504 clinic or surgery request most often lands among those loans of over $1 million to $2 million, and the study should benchmark the project budget and its coverage against peers of that size.
Cancellation floors and what they ask of the study
Cancellation is the outcome that most separates this class's two programs. Of the 7(a) approvals given in FY2017 through FY2024, 14.0% at minimum were cancelled; of the 504 approvals, 29.0% at minimum. These are floors, and the true rates can be higher. A cancelled approval is a project that cleared credit and still did not fund. In a class that mixes walk-in clinics with surgery centers and emergency facilities, the conditions that can unwind an approval are specific: a license or certification still pending, physicians or surgical partners who have not committed capital, payer contracts not yet signed, a lease or site not yet secured, or a budget that grew after approval. A study that documents each of these before closing gives the lender a reason to expect the approval to fund.
Losses that surface late
Among 7(a) loans funded across FY2017 through FY2021, 0.85% were charged off within 5 years, yet 2.5% have been charged off to date. The difference between those two floors can only have opened after the 5-year mark, so in this class much of the loss record lies beyond the opening years. A study that tests coverage only through the opening ramp misses that part of the record; the coverage test should run through a mature year and then under stress, with reimbursement cut and volume short of plan, well beyond the fifth year. No 504 charge-off rate is printed, its cohort being too thin, under 30 loans. That missing rate is no zero, and a 504 study should not present the program's loss record as clean; it should rest its case on the project's own coverage.
| Program | Loans | Dollars | Lower quartile | Median loan | Upper quartile | Cancelled (floor) | Charged off (floor) | Charged off within 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBA 7(a) | 273 | $311.4 million | $200,000 | $687,000 | $1.6 million | 14.0% | 2.5% | 0.85% |
| SBA 504 | 37 | $54.5 million | $722,000 | $1.4 million | $1.9 million | 29.0% | not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort | not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort |
Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-programs.
| Loan size | SBA 7(a) loans | SBA 7(a) dollars | SBA 504 loans | SBA 504 dollars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $150,000 or less | 60 | $4.8 million | 0 | $0 |
| Over $150,000 to $350,000 | 41 | $11.0 million | 2 | fewer than 5 loans |
| Over $350,000 to $1 million | 66 | $44.8 million | 11 | $7.4 million |
| Over $1 million to $2 million | 57 | $80.7 million | 16 | $24.2 million |
| Over $2 million to $5 million | 49 | $170.2 million | 8 | withheld |
| Over $5 million | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA urgent care and ambulatory surgery loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals", https://www.analytics.loan/urgent-care-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-size-bands.
Questions buyers ask
Who prepares a feasibility study for an urgent care or surgery center loan?
Loan Analytics does, as an independent consultant whose report goes into the lender's file, with Daniel Smith, MAI signing it. The study covers walk-in urgent care, ambulatory surgery and freestanding emergency projects, which SBA's files code together, and it is drafted to the financing in play, whether a 7(a) or 504 guarantee from SBA, USDA's guarantee under Business and Industry, or plain bank credit. It places the project in the SBA record on this page, 273 7(a) loans and 37 504 loans in FY2017 to FY2026, by state, metro and loan size, and then supplies what no loan file holds: the visits or cases, payers, competitors, licenses and budget of the subject itself.
Will the lender insist on a feasibility study for my urgent care clinic?
That is the lender's decision under its credit policy and its program, and the record on this page shows why lenders in this class often make it. Of 7(a) approvals dated FY2017 through FY2024, at least 14.0% never funded; under 504 the floor is 29.0%; and 2.5% or more of the 7(a) loans that funded in FY2017 through FY2021 were later charged off. A clinic or surgery center earns its payments through its operator, its physicians and its payer contracts, so a lender cannot lean on the building alone and asks for evidence that the facility will perform. A ground-up project, or a request sized over $2 million to $5 million, where this class's 7(a) dollars concentrate, gives a lender the strongest reason to ask.
How much does an urgent care feasibility study cost?
This site prices studies only from its own 2026 fee survey, which collects the ranges providers post publicly. For SBA work on one standard special-purpose site the survey's band is $5,000 to $12,500. For complex SBA engagements, a tier whose examples include multi-site deals, ground-up hotels and phased construction, the band is $10,000 to $25,000. Studies meeting 7 CFR Part 5001 for USDA open at $7,500 and reach beyond $18,750. Urgent care is not priced by name in the survey. An operating walk-in clinic belongs nearer the first band than a new surgery center with physician owners and phased construction, and our own fee arrives once we have read your scope request.
What is the timeline for an urgent care feasibility study?
We do not quote a standard period. The schedule is set in our reply to the scope request, working back from the date your lender needs the report. In this class the time goes into evidence that sits outside the sponsor's own file: the license or certification path for the format, letters of intent or ownership commitments from the physicians or surgeons who will bring patients, the status of payer contracts, the competing providers counted in the trade area, and contractor and equipment quotes for the build-out. A sponsor holding those documents shortens the work. One still negotiating them should order the study early, since unfinished items of this kind are what a lender will want settled before closing.
What does an urgent care feasibility study test?
The format comes first, since SBA's files lump walk-in clinics, day-surgery centers and stand-alone emergency rooms together although they differ in revenue, licensing and cost. For urgent care, the study projects visits from the households and workers near the site, their insurance, and the clinics, hospital emergency departments and retail clinics already serving them. For surgery, it counts the cases the committed surgeons can bring and the specialties they cover. Then come reimbursement by payer, the build-out and equipment budget from quotes, staffing for the hours or cases planned, the opening ramp, and a coverage stress test carried beyond the fifth anniversary of funding; in this class, 7(a) charge-offs stand at 0.85% within 5 years and 2.5% to date.
Is a feasibility study for an ambulatory surgery center different from one for urgent care?
Yes, even though SBA's files pool them: one NAICS code holds walk-in clinics, day-surgery centers and stand-alone emergency rooms alike, so every count here blends the three. A walk-in clinic's demand comes from the people living and working near the site; a surgery center's comes from the surgeons who commit to it and the cases they control. The surgery study therefore tests physician commitments and ownership, case volume by specialty, the operating rooms and their equipment, and state licensing and certification. The class's wide spread of loan sizes, from a 7(a) lower quartile of $200,000 to 49 loans over $2 million to $5 million, is what a mix of such different formats would produce, which is why the class median should not be read as the size of any single format.
How many SBA loans have gone to urgent care and surgery centers?
Between FY2017 and FY2026, SBA lenders approved 273 7(a) loans for $311.4 million and 37 504 loans for $54.5 million in this class. The full record, measurable from FY2001, holds 748 7(a) loans for $587.6 million and 100 504 loans for $108.4 million. The busiest 7(a) year was FY2016, with 59 loans; within the last decade the high was 34 in FY2021 and the low 12 in FY2020. Under 504 no year exceeds 8 loans, and FY2024 had none. Any year whose files leave too many loans without a code the class can use carries a floor count, so these totals are minimums and the real lending may be larger.
What size SBA loan does an urgent care center usually get?
Under 7(a) the middle loan in FY2017 to FY2026 is $687,000, with a lower quartile of $200,000 and an upper quartile of $1.6 million. Under 504 the middle loan is $1.4 million, with quartiles of $722,000 and $1.9 million. The single most crowded 7(a) tier, with 66 loans, runs over $350,000 to $1 million, but the most dollars sit with clinic and surgery loans sized over $2 million to $5 million, $170.2 million on 49 loans, and no loan in either program exceeds $5 million. By place, the medians are $1.2 million in California, $1.1 million in Texas, $800,000 in Florida and $550,000 across the New York-Newark-Jersey City area. Because the class mixes clinics with surgery and emergency centers, the right size for a project comes from its own budget rather than from these medians.
Should an urgent care project use SBA 7(a) or 504?
The program is a choice for the lender and the borrower, and this page reports outcomes rather than eligibility. What it shows is that 7(a) carries most of the class, 273 loans against 37 under 504 in FY2017 to FY2026, and that the two programs look different. Loans under 504 are the bigger ones here, at a $1.4 million median over a $722,000 lower quartile, and their cancellation floor is 29.0% against 14.0% under 7(a). California is the one state where 504 is a large part of the class, with 12 of its 38 loans. We draft to whichever program carries the loan, and in a 504 clinic or surgery file the lender's sharpest question will be whether the approval actually funds.
Why are so many urgent care and surgery center approvals cancelled?
SBA's data marks an approval as cancelled without giving a reason. The floors themselves are clear: at least 14.0% of 7(a) approvals dated FY2017 through FY2024 and at least 29.0% of the 504 approvals never funded, and among the states with a printed rate, Florida stands at 22.6% and Texas at 10.3%. Projects in this class depend on pieces that arrive separately: a license or certification, committed physicians or surgical partners, payer contracts, a site or lease, and a construction budget that holds. An approval granted before those pieces are in place can lapse when one of them fails. The study shows the lender, item by item, which pieces are secured and which still carry dates.
How often do SBA urgent care loans default?
The page reports charge-offs, the loans written off, and reports them as floors. Among the class's 7(a) loans that funded in FY2017 through FY2021, the written-off share to date has a floor of 2.5%, and 0.85% went within 5 years of funding, so part of the losses arrived after the fifth year. No 504 rate is printed because that cohort holds under 30 loans, no state prints a rate, and the New York area's figure is withheld. A blank in any of those places means unpublished, never zero. Lenders treat the 2.5% floor as the class's loss record, and the study meets it by showing the subject's coverage under a reimbursement cut and a slower ramp.
Which states have the most SBA urgent care and surgery center loans?
Texas leads with 44 loans for $74.1 million in FY2017 to FY2026, then California with 38 for $58.7 million and Florida with 37 for $45.5 million. New Jersey follows with 24 loans for $24.0 million, then Georgia and New York with 15 each, North Carolina with 14 and Arizona with 13, whose loans carry $26.0 million, more than any state outside the leading three. Only those three rows go deep enough for medians, program counts and a cancellation floor. The urgent care pages for Texas, California and Florida linked from this page go further inside each of those states.
Which lenders and loan types are active in urgent care lending?
This page's tables count the class by program, state, metro and loan size; they do not rank lenders, so none is named here. On loan types, 7(a) dominates, with 273 loans against 37 under 504 in FY2017 to FY2026, and its loans run from 60 of $150,000 or less up to 49 sized over $2 million to $5 million. Under 504, 16 loans sized over $1 million to $2 million make up the busiest tier. Our report is addressed to the bank or lender actually carrying your file, and it sets the request beside peers of its own program and size.
Is urgent care lending in the New York area different?
It is the one metro area with its own row: New York-Newark-Jersey City holds 31 loans for $32.0 million over the decade to FY2026, a count beaten only by the Texas, California and Florida state rows. Its median of $550,000 is the lowest the page prints, below the class's 7(a) median of $687,000, and its charge-off figure is withheld, which is not a zero. A study for a project there is measured against smaller peers than one in Texas or California, has to justify a larger request by its format, budget and payer base, and has to count competing providers street by street, since the metro already carries more of the class's loans than most states do.
Will you write an urgent care study for a USDA B&I guaranteed loan?
We will, and it is drafted to USDA's rules rather than SBA's. The counts on this page come from SBA's files only, so for a Business and Industry file the national figures here serve as context while the study's own market, payer and cost evidence carries the case. For the fee, the 2026 survey of study pricing on this site gives USDA work under 7 CFR Part 5001 its own band, opening at $7,500, above where the single-site SBA band begins. Name the program when you request the scope, so the study is built to that standard from its first page.
Does the SBA record separate urgent care from surgery centers and freestanding ERs?
No. The three formats sit under one NAICS code, so SBA's files cannot distinguish a walk-in clinic from a surgery center or an emergency facility, and every figure on this page covers the three together. That mix helps explain why the class spreads so widely in size, from 60 small 7(a) loans, each $150,000 or less, to 49 over $2 million to $5 million, and why a class median says little about any single project. The study fixes the format first and then uses the record with care: as evidence of how lenders have treated the class as a whole, while the project's own budget, demand and payers decide the case.
Are SBA lenders still financing urgent care in 2026?
Yes. In FY2026 SBA lenders approved 20 7(a) loans and 4 504 loans in this class, after 25 7(a) loans and 2 504 loans in FY2025. The decade's 7(a) high was 34 loans in FY2021, and FY2023 and FY2024 each carried 33, so FY2026 is a quieter year rather than a stop. The long table withholds the dollar figures for FY2025 and FY2026, so they are not quoted here. For a project being financed now, the study's job is to show that this facility, in this trade area, earns its payments, whatever the national count does in a given year.
What do I send to get an urgent care feasibility study scoped?
Send the site or trade area, the format (walk-in urgent care, ambulatory surgery or a freestanding emergency facility), the services and hours planned, the physicians, surgeons or operator involved and their commitments, the payer contracts signed or in negotiation, the license or certification status, the build-out and equipment budget, the loan program and amount, and the lender with its deadline. With those in hand we can locate the request within the national record above, say whether it sits near the $687,000 7(a) median, the $1.4 million 504 median or in the top occupied band, and reply through the Request Scope & Timeline form with the scope, the schedule and the fee.
Loan Analytics prepares the feasibility study a lender reads before it commits: for a urgent care and ambulatory surgery project anywhere in the United States, financed under SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry or a conventional bank loan. Tell us the project and the lender's deadline, and we reply with scope, timeline and fee.
Daniel Smith, MAI
Request Scope & Timeline
Start with the data.
Contact Us