Continuing Care Retirement Community Feasibility Study

The SBA loan record for continuing care retirement community projects nationally and by state, and what a feasibility study for one has to test.

Continuing care retirement community feasibility study consultant

Loan Analytics works as the continuing care retirement community feasibility study consultant for sponsors, operators and buyers whose lender wants an independent test of the project before it commits. The SBA files give that lender a record to hold the study against. From FY2017 to FY2026, SBA 7(a) approved 130 loans to this class for $102.6 million and SBA 504 approved 47 for $66.0 million; across the full record, measured from FY2001, the counts are 555 and 406 and the dollars $404.8 million and $397.6 million. California and Minnesota lead the states with 15 loans each, Florida leads on dollars with $27.0 million from 14 loans, and Texas, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania fill out the upper rank. A continuing care study that never says where the request sits in that record leaves the credit officer to place it unaided.

Our study is built for the reader who approves the loan. It draws the primary market area and counts the older households there with the age and the income or assets to sign the contract on offer, whether an entrance fee, a monthly rental or a blend of the two, then weighs the presales and deposits already in hand against that pool. It inventories every competing community and every project in the pipeline, with their fill history. It prices each level of care separately, sets the marketing and fill-up reserve, staffs the nursing floor to the licensing standard and carries debt service coverage month by month from opening to stabilization, counting entrance-fee cash only after the refund promises attached to it. For the appraisal it separates the real property from the operating business. Then it sets the loan against this page's scale: a 7(a) median of $350,000 inside a middle half running from $100,000 to $963,075, and a 504 median of $937,000 inside a middle half from $303,000 to $2.3 million.

Read the floors before you call. Charge-offs on the 7(a) continuing care loans disbursed in FY2017 through FY2021 run to at least 7.1%, with 5.7% lost within 5 years of funding; at least 12.7% of 7(a) approvals and 15.6% of 504 approvals from FY2017 to FY2024 were cancelled before they funded. Under 504 the disbursed cohort is under 30 loans, too small for a published charge-off rate. A lender with those floors in front of it will test the fill years hardest, and so does our study. Send the community's location, its levels of care and unit counts, the contract type, the presales or deposits to date, the program and lender, and the lender's own deadline, through the scope form below; the reply carries scope, timeline and fee.

Request Scope & Timeline

Small operators, not full campuses

The SBA record for continuing care retirement communities is small and made of modest loans. Across fiscal 2017 to 2026, 7(a) approved 130 loans in this class for $102.6 million, at a median of $350,000; 504 approved 47 for $66.0 million, at a median of $937,000. Those medians describe small operators and single buildings, and a sponsor planning a full campus with independent living, assisted living and nursing on one site should not treat them as comparables. Activity was heaviest at the start of the period, with 30 loans under 7(a) worth $34.9 million in FY2017, and thin afterward; the 504 program approved none in FY2026.

A high 7(a) loss floor

Of the 7(a) loans in this class that funded in fiscal 2017 to 2021, at least 7.1% have been charged off, a floor high enough to shape any lender's view of small operators in this field. For 504 the charge-off rate is withheld: fewer than 30 loans sit in that cohort, so no rate is published, and the missing figure says nothing either way. Cancellation after approval is 12.7% in 7(a) and 15.6% in 504. For a borrower, this means the lender will look past the real estate to the operator's history with resident contracts, licensure and staffing; for a lender, the 7(a) floor argues for conservative coverage and proven operating experience.

Testing a continuing care plan

A feasibility study for a continuing care community has to test demand among age- and income-qualified households in the primary market area, the depth of that pool for the contract types offered, whether entrance-fee, rental or a mix, and the presales or deposits the sponsor has secured. It must account for competing communities, their absorption and their pipeline. On cost, it needs the construction or acquisition budget for each level of care, the marketing and fill-up reserve, and staffing to licensure standards at the nursing level. Debt service coverage should be tested through the fill-up period, with entrance-fee receipts treated conservatively and against the refund obligations those contracts can carry. The appraisal has to separate real property from business value and account for the approvals each level of care needs.

Two limits shape these numbers. A building that offers only independent living cannot be picked out, since that use was never given a code; and the code used here also absorbs assisted living with on-site nursing, blending that segment into the class. Everything on the page comes from SBA loan-level files, so retirement communities financed with bonds or bank debt are absent.

SBA loan record for continuing care retirement community, United States, FY2017 to FY2026

ProgramLoansDollarsMedian loanCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
SBA 7(a) 130$102.6 million $350,000 12.7% 7.1%
SBA 504 47$66.0 million $937,000 15.6% not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for continuing care retirement community, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/continuing-care-retirement-community-feasibility-study#record-C12.

Cancellation counts FY2017 to FY2024 approvals; charge-off counts FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans to date. Both are floors, and a rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort.

SBA 7(a) continuing care retirement community loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

0102030FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 30Loans, FY2018: 20Loans, FY2019: 16Loans, FY2020: 5Loans, FY2021: 11Loans, FY2022: 11Loans, FY2023: 10Loans, FY2024: 7Loans, FY2025: 9Loans, FY2026: 11
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY201730$34.9 million
FY201820$5.8 million
FY201916$10.6 million
FY20205$2.3 million
FY202111$11.7 million
FY202211$10.3 million
FY202310$7.4 million
FY20247$4.3 million
FY20259$6.8 million
FY202611$8.5 million

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for continuing care retirement community, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/continuing-care-retirement-community-feasibility-study#record-C12.

SBA 504 continuing care retirement community loans approved nationally, by fiscal year

02.557.51012.5FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 11Loans, FY2018: 5Loans, FY2019: 5Loans, FY2020: 2Loans, FY2021: 10Loans, FY2022: 5Loans, FY2023: 1Loans, FY2024: 6Loans, FY2025: 2Loans, FY2026: 0
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY201711$22.0 million
FY20185$6.1 million
FY20195$10.1 million
FY20202$2.5 million
FY202110$7.1 million
FY20225$9.8 million
FY20231$249,000
FY20246$7.5 million
FY20252$584,000
FY20260$0

Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, SBA loan record for continuing care retirement community, United States, FY2017 to FY2026, https://www.analytics.loan/continuing-care-retirement-community-feasibility-study#record-C12.

Independent living has no own code. Shared code: 623311 also holds assisted living with on-site nursing.

Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30.

SBA lending to continuing care retirement community projects, FY1991 to FY2026

Every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan approved for a continuing care retirement community project since FY1991, by fiscal year, nationally.

Measured from FY2001, not FY1991

The yearly table opens at FY1991, but the rows for FY1991 through FY2000 all say not measured: in those years SBA's files place too few loans in an industry code for this class to be counted. The record proper begins in FY2001 with 16 loans under 7(a) for $7.5 million and 20 under 504 for $10.3 million, so the totals row for FY1991 to FY2026, 555 7(a) loans for $404.8 million and 406 504 loans for $397.6 million, describes FY2001 onward. The source note adds a second limit: in a year when the codes are missing or unplaceable for more than one loan in a hundred, that year's count is a floor, so some years may understate the class. For a feasibility study this means the long record is a history of SBA's appetite for continuing care, not a census of every SBA loan to a retirement community, and the study should cite it that way when it tells a lender how many precedents exist.

504 carried as much money as 7(a)

Over the long record the two programs come out close to even in dollars, $397.6 million under 504 against $404.8 million under 7(a), even though 504 approved 406 loans to 555 under 7(a). The 504 loan to a continuing care project has run larger for most of the history, and in several years 504 was simply the bigger lender to the class: it approved more loans than 7(a) in FY2001, FY2007, FY2008, FY2010 and FY2011, and more dollars in FY2001, FY2005 to FY2008, FY2010 to FY2013, FY2016, FY2018 and FY2024. FY2013 is the clearest case, with 23 504 loans for $34.2 million beside 24 7(a) loans for $12.4 million: nearly the same count, a far larger sum. A lender that remembers this class from those years remembers larger projects, and a 504 continuing care study should be written for that reader, with land, building and equipment costs set out by level of care and an appraisal that splits the property from the business.

The busiest years and the biggest years differ

The 7(a) count peaked in FY2006 at 41 loans, yet those loans came to $16.8 million. FY2011 brought only 26 7(a) loans but $45.9 million, the largest 7(a) dollar total the table prints, and FY2012 followed with 32 loans for $38.2 million. The 504 program has the same shape: its count peaked at 35 loans in FY2006 for $25.3 million, while its dollars peaked at $46.9 million on 32 loans in FY2011, then $41.5 million on 30 in FY2012 and $34.2 million in FY2013. FY2011 to FY2013 is the window in which both programs financed the largest continuing care projects in the record. The consequence for a sponsor is age: a request near the top of the present range will find most of its large SBA precedents in this class more than a decade old, approved in a different market, so the study has to rebuild the demand and cost case from current evidence instead of pointing back to them.

504 turned first

The decline did not reach both programs at once. 504 slipped first: after 19 loans for $23.8 million in FY2014 it approved 10 for $10.6 million in FY2015 and 12 for $17.6 million in FY2016, while 7(a) held at 24 loans for $24.4 million in FY2015 and 23 for $13.8 million in FY2016 before its strong FY2017. Earlier, both programs dipped together in FY2009, to 17 loans in 7(a) and 13 in 504, and both recovered in FY2010 with 25 and 26 loans, ahead of the dollar peak of FY2011. What a lender will notice is that the 504 side of this class has been shrinking for longer, since FY2015, so a 504 continuing care request is now judged with very little recent precedent in the class, and the study must be complete enough to stand in for the comparables the record no longer supplies.

The turn after FY2017

FY2017 was the last strong year. 7(a) approved 30 loans for $34.9 million, a total the table prints higher only for FY2011 and FY2012, and 504 approved 11 for $22.0 million. In FY2018 7(a) fell to 20 loans and $5.8 million and has not recovered: from FY2002 through FY2017 the 7(a) count never dropped below 17, the FY2009 low, while from FY2019 through FY2026 it never rose above 16, the FY2019 figure, and touched 5 in FY2020. The 504 record turned harder. Its weakest year from FY2001 to FY2016 was FY2015, with 10 loans; since FY2018 that same 10, reached in FY2021, has been its best, and the program approved 1 loan in FY2023 and 0, for $0, in FY2026. The window this page measures most closely, FY2017 to FY2026, holds 130 of the 555 7(a) loans and 47 of the 406 504 loans. SBA lenders as a whole have approved few continuing care loans lately, which makes the market evidence inside a study, not the SBA's own history, the main source of a credit officer's comfort.

Withheld cells and a counted zero

FY2020, FY2023 and FY2025 each print a 7(a) count but no 7(a) dollars: 5 loans, 10 and 9, with the dollar totals withheld, and in each of those years the 504 row holds fewer than 5 loans, 2, 1 and 2, with no dollar figure. Nothing on this page fills those cells, and they should be read neither as small nor as zero. FY2026 is different in kind: 504 shows 0 loans and $0, a counted absence rather than a suppressed one. For a lender the effect is that average loan size cannot be read from this table for those years, so a study should anchor its size comparisons on the FY2017 to FY2026 quartiles in the loan size section below, which rest on the full 130 7(a) and 47 504 approvals, rather than on any single year.

What the yearly record asks of the study

Read together, the yearly rows tell a lender several things about a continuing care request. The class has been financed through both programs for as long as the files can measure it, so the concept is familiar to SBA credit. The volume clustered around FY2006 and the large loans in FY2011 to FY2013, so the precedents a big request would cite are old. And activity since FY2018 is thin enough in both programs that each new file is judged closely on its own facts. Our study answers that last point directly: it shows the market depth, the contract mix and the fill pace for the specific community from primary evidence, and it uses the SBA record for what the record can carry, the scale of loans and the floors, rather than as proof that a market wants another continuing care community.

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to continuing care retirement community projects by fiscal year
Fiscal yearSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
FY1991not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1992not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1993not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1994not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1995not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1996not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1997not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1998not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY1999not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY2000not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
FY200116$7.5 million20$10.3 million
FY200225$14.0 million23$12.4 million
FY200332$14.2 million13$7.3 million
FY200430$19.0 million17$10.9 million
FY200530$18.4 million26$19.7 million
FY200641$16.8 million35$25.3 million
FY200728$10.4 million32$19.7 million
FY200823$11.7 million28$20.7 million
FY200917$11.2 million13$9.6 million
FY201025$14.7 million26$21.3 million
FY201126$45.9 million32$46.9 million
FY201232$38.2 million30$41.5 million
FY201324$12.4 million23$34.2 million
FY201429$29.6 million19$23.8 million
FY201524$24.4 million10$10.6 million
FY201623$13.8 million12$17.6 million
FY201730$34.9 million11$22.0 million
FY201820$5.8 million5$6.1 million
FY201916$10.6 million5$10.1 million
FY20205withheld2fewer than 5 loans
FY202111$11.7 million10$7.1 million
FY202211$10.3 million5$9.8 million
FY202310withheld1fewer than 5 loans
FY20247$4.3 million6$7.5 million
FY20259withheld2fewer than 5 loans
FY202611$8.5 million0$0
FY1991 to FY2026555$404.8 million406$397.6 million
FY2017 to FY2026130$102.6 million47$66.0 million

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. A class figure counts the loans whose NAICS code places them in the class; in years when SBA's files leave the code missing or unplaceable for more than one loan in a hundred, the figure is a floor, and where too few loans are coded the year is not measured. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to continuing care retirement community projects by fiscal year", https://www.analytics.loan/continuing-care-retirement-community-feasibility-study#sba-record-sba-by-year.

Back to the contents

Every state ranked for continuing care retirement community lending

SBA loans to continuing care retirement community projects in each state from FY2017 to FY2026, ranked, with loan size, program split and the cohort floors where at least 30 loans support them.

California and Minnesota lead on count

California and Minnesota share the top of the state ranking with 15 loans each from FY2017 to FY2026, Florida and Texas follow with 14, Pennsylvania has 10, Michigan and Wisconsin 9 each, and Idaho 8. Below Idaho the rows thin quickly: Washington 7, Georgia and Ohio 6, Arizona and Kansas 5, then a run of states at 4 and fewer. No state comes near 30 loans, so every row reads too few loans for these measures: there is no state median, no state program split and no state cancellation or charge-off floor for this class. A lender in any state is therefore reading the national floors, 12.7% cancelled and 7.1% charged off under 7(a), not a figure for its own state, and a study that claimed a state loss rate for continuing care would be inventing one. What the state row can tell the lender is how many in-state precedents exist, and in most states the honest answer is a handful.

Ranked by dollars, Florida leads

The dollar column reorders the top of the table. Florida's 14 loans carry $27.0 million, the largest state total by a clear margin; Wisconsin's 9 loans carry $17.4 million, just above California's $17.3 million on 15; Texas follows at $16.6 million on 14; and Minnesota, level with California on count, drops to $11.4 million. Pennsylvania's 10 loans hold $10.6 million and Michigan's 9 hold $9.4 million. The split matters for the study. In Florida and Wisconsin the SBA has financed continuing care loans of larger size, so a large request there is less out of pattern; in Minnesota and California the count is high but the loans are smaller, so a lender there may know the class well from modest operator loans while holding little SBA precedent for a full campus. The study should state which pattern the project fits and test it against that state's row.

Rows that print a count but no dollars

Below Arizona and Kansas, at 5 loans each, the dollar column stops. Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, North Carolina and South Dakota hold 4 loans each; Alaska, Colorado, Maryland, Missouri, Montana and Oregon hold 3; Iowa, New Jersey, New Mexico and West Virginia hold 2; and Nebraska, Nevada and South Carolina hold 1. Every one of these rows reads fewer than five loans where the dollars would be, because a total resting on so few approvals would come close to revealing what a single borrower borrowed. Nothing on this page fills those cells, and a study should neither estimate them nor treat them as small. What the counts do establish is narrower: SBA lending in any of these states produced at most 4 continuing care approvals from FY2017 to FY2026, so a credit officer there has little in-state history to test a request against. The study therefore takes its scale from the national quartiles and size bands and its market evidence from the site's own area, and it says plainly how few in-state loans stand behind the state row.

The north central states and the interior West

Much of this ranking belongs to the north central states. Minnesota ties for the top on count and Wisconsin is second on dollars; Michigan has 9 loans for $9.4 million, Ohio 6 for $5.5 million and Kansas 5 for $2.6 million; and the region runs on below the dollar line with South Dakota at 4 loans, Missouri at 3, Iowa at 2 and Nebraska at 1. Wisconsin and Michigan make a telling pair: the same 9 loans, yet Wisconsin's carry $17.4 million and Michigan's $9.4 million, so at an equal count the Wisconsin record holds the larger continuing care loans. In the interior West, Idaho's 8 loans for $8.8 million form the largest row, while Arizona has 5 loans for $1.8 million, Colorado and Montana 3 each, New Mexico 2 and Nevada 1. For a sponsor in Minnesota, Wisconsin or Idaho, the lender may hold an in-state continuing care file to compare against; for one in Montana, New Mexico or Nevada, the lender's in-state SBA experience of the class on this page is slight, and the study must make up the difference.

The Northeast, the Southeast and the Pacific

Beyond Florida and California, the coastal regions hold little of this class. In the Northeast, Pennsylvania's 10 loans for $10.6 million make the only row there with a dollar total: Connecticut and Massachusetts have 4 loans each, Maryland 3, New Jersey and West Virginia 2 each, and New York has no row. To the south, Florida's 14 loans and $27.0 million stand beside Georgia's 6 for $2.5 million, with North Carolina at 4 loans and South Carolina at 1, both too few for a dollar figure. On the Pacific, California's 15 loans for $17.3 million lead, Washington follows with 7 for $4.9 million, and Oregon and Alaska hold 3 each. Washington's row sits below that of neighbouring Idaho, 8 loans for $8.8 million, so in the Northwest the larger SBA record for this class belongs to the inland state. A sponsor in one of the thin coastal rows should expect the lender to treat the project as rare in its SBA experience, and the study to supply the comparables from competing communities rather than from loans.

States without a row

Some states do not appear in the table at all, among them New York, Virginia, Tennessee, Indiana and Utah. The printed state rows also hold fewer loans together than the national count of 130 7(a) and 47 504 approvals, so a few loans sit outside any state row shown here. An absent state is therefore not a state with a count of zero; it is a state for which this page prints nothing. For a continuing care sponsor there the consequence is the same either way: the lender has no in-state SBA precedent on this page to compare against, and the feasibility study carries the whole local case. It has to establish the depth of qualified households, the competing communities and the licences each level of care requires in that state from primary sources, then place the loan on the national quartiles and floors.

How the study uses a state row

A state row is where the lender's question starts, not where it ends. In Florida the study can show where the request falls against 14 loans and $27.0 million; in Minnesota against 15 loans and $11.4 million; in Idaho against 8 and $8.8 million. It then has to go below the state to the market area, because none of these rows says anything about the competing communities or the households around a site, and each state total mixes both programs and every kind of operator the class code holds, assisted living with nursing on site among them. Our continuing care studies report the state row, explain what it can and cannot support, and build the demand case from the market itself.

SBA continuing care retirement community loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026
StateLoansDollarsMedian loanSBA 7(a) loansSBA 504 loansCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)
California15$17.3 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Minnesota15$11.4 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Florida14$27.0 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Texas14$16.6 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Pennsylvania10$10.6 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Michigan9$9.4 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Wisconsin9$17.4 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Idaho8$8.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Washington7$4.9 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Georgia6$2.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Ohio6$5.5 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Arizona5$1.8 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Kansas5$2.6 milliontoo few loans for these measures
Connecticut4fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Illinois4fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Massachusetts4fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
North Carolina4fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
South Dakota4fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Alaska3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Colorado3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Maryland3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Missouri3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Montana3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Oregon3fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Iowa2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
New Jersey2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
New Mexico2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
West Virginia2fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Nebraska1fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
Nevada1fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures
South Carolina1fewer than five loanstoo few loans for these measures

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA continuing care retirement community loans by state, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/continuing-care-retirement-community-feasibility-study#states-states.

Back to the contents

Loan sizes, program split and cohort floors for continuing care retirement community loans

How large continuing care retirement community loans run under each SBA program, how they fall into size bands, and how often they were cancelled or charged off.

Each program at its own scale

7(a) and 504 finance continuing care at different scales. Under 7(a) the lower quartile is $100,000, the median $350,000 and the upper quartile $963,075; under 504 the same points are $303,000, $937,000 and $2.3 million. The 504 lower quartile falls just short of the 7(a) median, while the 504 median falls just short of the 7(a) upper quartile, so a typical 504 loan in this class is the size of a large 7(a) loan. That sets the lender's expectations before the study is read: a 7(a) request near the 504 median of $937,000 sits close to the 7(a) upper quartile of $963,075 and reads as a big loan by this program's standard, while the same amount under 504 is ordinary. The study should say which program the loan uses and where the amount falls on that program's quartiles, because the lender will ask exactly that.

7(a): many small loans, a few large ones

The 7(a) size bands show where the count and the money part ways. The smallest band holds 46 loans and only $3.1 million; the second holds 20 loans and $5.3 million; the third, over $350,000, holds 33 loans and $21.6 million; the fourth 16 loans and $23.8 million; the fifth 15 loans and $48.7 million; and the top band 0 loans and $0. The median of $350,000 sits exactly on the line between the second and third bands. The smallest band therefore holds more loans than any other band and fewer dollars than any other band with loans in it, while the fifth band holds more 7(a) dollars than any other, $48.7 million of the $102.6 million total, carried by 15 loans. A lender reading a large 7(a) continuing care request is comparing it with that short list of 15, not with the 130 loans the class total suggests, and the study should be explicit that the project belongs to the short list.

504: weighted toward the top

The 504 bands lean the other way. The smallest band holds 7 loans with dollars withheld, the second 7 loans for $1.7 million, the third 10 for $6.3 million, the fourth 9 for $12.8 million and the fifth 13 for $38.8 million, more loans than any other 504 band and most of the program's $66.0 million. The top band holds 1 loan, shown as fewer than 5 loans with no dollar figure. Where 7(a) is crowded at the bottom, 504 is crowded near the top: the 504 file in this class is built from fewer, larger loans. For a 504 continuing care study, that puts the building case first: the cost of each level of care, the appraisal split between property and business, and a fill-up period the project's cash can carry before the loan is fully serviced from operations.

Where the programs meet

Set side by side, the bands show the two programs drawing level as loans grow. In the smallest band 7(a) outnumbers 504 by 46 loans to 7; in the third band, over $350,000, by 33 to 10; in the fourth by 16 to 9; in the fifth the counts nearly meet, 15 to 13, and so do the dollars, $48.7 million to $38.8 million; and only in the top band does 504 lead, 1 loan to 0. For a continuing care request in the fifth band, the SBA precedents are split almost evenly between the programs, so the program choice at that size turns on the project and the lender rather than on the record, and the study has to be written so that a lender under either program can rely on its market, cost and coverage findings.

Above the fifth band

Above the fifth band the record nearly ends: 0 loans under 7(a) and 1 under 504 from FY2017 to FY2026. Within the fifth band itself sit 15 loans under 7(a) for $48.7 million and 13 under 504 for $38.8 million. A single campus joining nursing, assisted living and independent living, financed at a size beyond that band, has almost no SBA precedent in this class, and the class code cannot even isolate independent living. For that sponsor the study is the lender's main evidence. It has to show the absorption of each component, the presale or deposit commitments, the cash needed to reach stabilized occupancy and the coverage after it, because the lender cannot borrow comfort from a peer group that barely exists.

Approvals that never funded

Cancellation is the first floor a continuing care lender sees: at least 12.7% of 7(a) approvals and 15.6% of 504 approvals made in FY2017 through FY2024 ended in cancellation instead of funding. Both are floors, so the true share may be higher, and the 504 floor is the higher of the two. The table counts cancellations without giving reasons, so it cannot say whether a market, a cost overrun, an appraisal gap or the borrower's own decision stopped any one loan. What it does say is that in this class an approval is not a closing. A study ordered before the credit decision can settle the market, cost and value questions of a continuing care plan before approval rather than after it: whether the presales hold, whether construction cost fits the budget for each level of care, and whether the appraisal supports the amount.

Charge-offs came early

In the 7(a) program, this class's FY2017 to FY2021 disbursement cohort has lost at least 7.1% to charge-off, and 5.7% within 5 years, so most of the loss recorded so far arrived early in the life of these loans. The 504 charge-off rate and its 5-year rate are blank here, since that cohort holds under 30 loans; the missing number says nothing about whether 504 loans in this class have failed. For a lender these floors point to the fill-up years, and for a study they set the test: debt service coverage measured from opening through stabilization, a downside case with slower move-ins and lower contract prices, entrance-fee cash counted net of refund obligations, and an operator whose record at each level of care is documented. A continuing care loan that still covers its debt in the early years on the study's downside case answers the question this floor raises.

SBA continuing care retirement community loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026
ProgramLoansDollarsLower quartileMedian loanUpper quartileCancelled (floor)Charged off (floor)Charged off within 5 years
SBA 7(a)130$102.6 million$100,000$350,000$963,07512.7%7.1%5.7%
SBA 50447$66.0 million$303,000$937,000$2.3 million15.6%not reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohortnot reported: fewer than 30 loans in the cohort

Source: Loan Analytics' SBA loan record from SBA's 7(a) and 504 loan-level files, approvals FY2017 to FY2026 as of 2026-09-30; rates are floors and need at least 30 loans in their cohort; dollars are not shown where fewer than five loans would reveal a single loan. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA continuing care retirement community loans by program, FY2017 to FY2026", https://www.analytics.loan/continuing-care-retirement-community-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-programs.

SBA continuing care retirement community loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals
Loan sizeSBA 7(a) loansSBA 7(a) dollarsSBA 504 loansSBA 504 dollars
$150,000 or less46$3.1 million7withheld
Over $150,000 to $350,00020$5.3 million7$1.7 million
Over $350,000 to $1 million33$21.6 million10$6.3 million
Over $1 million to $2 million16$23.8 million9$12.8 million
Over $2 million to $5 million15$48.7 million13$38.8 million
Over $5 million0$01fewer than 5 loans

Source: SBA 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov; gross approvals, cancelled approvals included), aggregated by Loan Analytics; each figure is kept with its source file and retrieval date. Download this table (CSV). Cite as: Loan Analytics, "SBA continuing care retirement community loans by size band, FY2017 to FY2026 approvals", https://www.analytics.loan/continuing-care-retirement-community-feasibility-study#loan-sizes-size-bands.

Back to the contents

Questions buyers ask

Who prepares a feasibility study for a continuing care retirement community loan?

Loan Analytics, working as an independent consultant, writes it, and Daniel Smith, MAI signs it. The audience is the lender's credit committee, and the program behind the loan can be conventional bank debt, USDA Business and Industry, SBA 504 or SBA 7(a). The study places the request in the record on this page, 130 7(a) loans for $102.6 million and 47 504 loans for $66.0 million from FY2017 to FY2026, and then builds the market, cost and coverage case for the specific community.

What does a lender require in a continuing care retirement community feasibility study?

A lender wants to know that the community will fill, that its contracts will pay and that the loan will be serviced through the fill-up years. In practice that means a defined market area and a count of the older households there who can afford the contract offered; the presales or deposits already signed; every competing community and pipeline project; a budget for each level of care with a fill-up reserve; staffing at the nursing level to the licensing standard; debt service coverage from opening to stabilization, with entrance-fee cash netted against refund promises; and an appraisal that divides property from business. The 7(a) charge-off floor on this page, 7.1%, is why the early years get the hardest test.

How much does a continuing care retirement community feasibility study cost?

The answer comes from the fee survey Loan Analytics published on this site in 2026, its post on SBA feasibility study cost in 2026, which records what providers publish and labels it directional. Complex SBA studies, a tier that names assisted living, multi-site concepts and phased construction, are listed at $10,000 to $25,000; one-site studies of ordinary special-purpose properties at $5,000 to $12,500; and a study prepared to USDA's requirements from $7,500 to $18,750 and up. A continuing care project that includes assisted living carries one of the features the survey places in its complex tier. Our own fee is quoted with the scope, once the community, its program and its lender are known.

How long does a continuing care retirement community feasibility study take?

There is no fixed answer, and this page does not publish one. The time depends on what the study must establish: an operating community being bought has a history to test, while a new campus that adds nursing and assisted living to independent living needs a market section and a cost review for each level of care, a fill schedule measured from opening and verification of every competing community and pipeline project. Presale and deposit evidence, the state approvals for each level of care and the lender's own review standard all add work. Tell us through the scope form when the lender expects the report; the reply sets out a timeline for that particular study.

How many SBA loans have gone to continuing care retirement communities?

From FY2017 to FY2026, 130 under 7(a) for $102.6 million and 47 under 504 for $66.0 million. The longer record on this page, measured from FY2001 because the earlier years are not measured, holds 555 7(a) loans for $404.8 million and 406 504 loans for $397.6 million. The counts are gross approvals with cancelled approvals included, and in years when SBA's files leave industry codes missing the year's figure is a floor.

Is SBA lending to continuing care communities rising or falling?

Falling, on this record. 7(a) approved 30 loans for $34.9 million in FY2017 and 20 for $5.8 million in FY2018, and from FY2019 to FY2026 it approved between 5 and 16 loans a year, with 11 for $8.5 million in FY2026. 504 approved 11 loans for $22.0 million in FY2017 and 0 in FY2026. Both programs were busier through most of FY2001 to FY2016, when 7(a) peaked at 41 loans in FY2006 and 504 at 35 in the same year. SBA lenders have approved few continuing care files lately, so the market evidence in a study carries more of the case.

What size are SBA loans to continuing care retirement communities?

Modest for the class. The 7(a) median is $350,000, with a lower quartile of $100,000 and an upper quartile of $963,075; the 504 median is $937,000, with quartiles of $303,000 and $2.3 million. In the size bands, 46 loans under 7(a) sit in the smallest band and 15 in the fifth, which holds $48.7 million, more than any other 7(a) band; under 504, 13 loans and $38.8 million sit in the fifth band and 1 loan above it. The medians describe operators and single buildings rather than full campuses, which is why the study has to show the lender which part of this distribution the project resembles.

Which states have the most SBA continuing care loans?

By count, California and Minnesota with 15 each, then Florida and Texas with 14, Pennsylvania with 10, Michigan and Wisconsin with 9 and Idaho with 8, all from FY2017 to FY2026. By dollars, Florida leads with $27.0 million, followed by Wisconsin at $17.4 million, California at $17.3 million and Texas at $16.6 million. No state reaches the 30 loans a state median or floor needs, so every state is read against the national figures.

Can I get a continuing care feasibility study in a state with few or no SBA loans in this record?

Yes. Loan Analytics prepares continuing care studies for projects in every state, and the thinner the state's row, the more the study has to carry. Nebraska, Nevada and South Carolina each show 1 loan on this page, with no dollar figure because fewer than five loans stand behind the row, and New York, Virginia and Tennessee have no row; that is not a count of zero, since some loans sit outside the printed state rows. In those states the study lines the request up with the national quartiles and floors, then assembles the local evidence from the market area itself.

What is the charge-off rate on SBA continuing care loans?

Under 7(a), no less than 7.1% of the continuing care loans that went out in FY2017 through FY2021 have since been charged off, and 5.7% within 5 years. Both are floors. For 504 no rate is reported, since its cohort is below 30 loans, and the absence is not a zero. A lender will read the 7(a) floor as a reason to test the early years, and our study runs coverage from opening through stabilization, and again on a downside case, before it reaches a conclusion.

How often are SBA continuing care loans cancelled after approval?

Of the approvals dated FY2017 through FY2024, cancellation took at least 12.7% under 7(a) and 15.6% under 504, and both are floors. The table does not record why. For a sponsor, the point is that approval and funding are separate events: market, cost and appraisal questions that surface after the credit decision can still stop the deal, and a study finished before approval puts the answers in the lender's file first.

Which SBA program, 7(a) or 504, suits a continuing care project?

The choice rests with the lender and the project, and this page does not set program rules. What the record shows is scale and recency. 504 loans in this class run larger, with a $937,000 median against $350,000 under 7(a), and 504 has carried nearly as many dollars over the long record, $397.6 million against $404.8 million. But 504 activity has thinned to 1 loan in FY2023, 6 in FY2024, 2 in FY2025 and 0 in FY2026, while 7(a) approved 11 in FY2026. A study states which program the loan uses and places the amount on that program's quartiles.

Are SBA continuing care loans good comparables for a full campus?

Rarely, and a study should say so. The medians, $350,000 under 7(a) and $937,000 under 504, describe operators and single buildings. The class code has blind spots: independent living has no code of its own, so a community offering only independent living cannot be found in these files, and the code that does apply also covers assisted living facilities with nursing care on the premises. Bond-financed and bank-financed communities never enter SBA files. The SBA record gives the lender scale and floors; the comparables for a campus come from the study's survey of competing communities.

Why are some years and cells on this page withheld or not measured?

Each blank has its own cause. FY1991 to FY2000 are not measured because SBA's files place too few loans in an industry code in those years to count this class. Within the measured years, the 7(a) dollars for FY2020, FY2023 and FY2025 are withheld, and the 504 rows for those years show fewer than 5 loans with no dollar total. A withheld cell carries no number on this page and is not a zero. State medians and floors are absent because no state reaches the 30 loans a rate needs.

Does an entrance-fee community need a different feasibility study from a rental one?

The questions change, though the SBA data does not separate the two. An entrance-fee community has to show buyers able to fund the fee, deposits that hold through construction, and coverage that counts fee receipts only after the refunds those contracts promise; a rental community is tested on the affordability of the monthly fee and the pace of move-ins. A blend needs both tests. In each case the lender reads the result against the 7.1% floor on 7(a) charge-offs in this class, so the fill years carry the weight.

Which lenders make SBA loans to continuing care retirement communities?

This page ranks the class by year, state, program and loan size; it carries no lender table, so it names no lender. The record still says something about where the lending happens: from FY2017 to FY2026, 7(a) lenders approved 130 continuing care loans against 47 under 504, and in FY2026 7(a) approved 11 while 504 approved 0. The SBA 7(a) and SBA 504 pages for this class on this site name the lenders their tables hold. Our study is written to be read by whichever lender the sponsor chooses.

Why does a lender want a feasibility study as well as an appraisal for a continuing care community?

Because the two reports answer different questions. The appraisal sets a value on the property and, for a continuing care community, splits the real estate from the business. The feasibility study asks whether the business will work: whether enough qualified households live in the market area, whether the contract type fits them, how fast units fill against competing communities, what each level of care costs to build and staff, and whether cash covers debt service from opening through stabilization. The lender needs both, and the 7(a) floors on this page, 12.7% cancelled and 7.1% charged off, are the backdrop against which it reads the study's answer.

Does Loan Analytics prepare feasibility studies for buying an existing continuing care community?

Yes, and an acquisition study asks different questions from a new build. It tests the occupancy and fill history the buyer inherits, the resident contracts in force and any refund obligations attached to them, staffing and licensure at each level of care, and whether the purchase leaves debt service covered on the existing operation before any expansion. It then places the purchase loan on this page's quartiles, a 7(a) median of $350,000 and a 504 median of $937,000, so the lender sees at once how the request compares with the class.

How is a continuing care study different from an assisted living study?

This class's SBA code also takes in assisted living with on-premises nursing, so the two overlap in the data, but a continuing care study carries more. It has to test demand for independent living, which has no SBA code at all, alongside the care levels; the contract structure, with entrance fees and refund promises where they apply; the movement of residents between levels as their needs change; and a campus budget in which each level of care has its own cost and staffing. The loan sizes on this page, with the 504 fifth band holding 13 loans and $38.8 million, show the scale some of these projects reach.

What information does Loan Analytics need to scope a continuing care study?

The site address or market; the levels of care and unit counts for independent living, assisted living, memory care and nursing; the contract type and fee levels; any presales or deposits; whether it is a ground-up build, an addition or a purchase; the operator's experience; the loan amount, program and lender; and the lender's closing calendar. With that we can tell you where the loan sits on this page's quartiles, which bands and floors the lender will compare it with, and what the study must establish.

Back to the contents

Loan Analytics prepares the feasibility study a lender reads before it commits: for a continuing care retirement community project anywhere in the United States, financed under SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry or a conventional bank loan. Tell us the project and the lender's deadline, and we reply with scope, timeline and fee.

Request Scope & Timeline

Start with the data.

Contact Us