This series sets down, article by article, how Loan Analytics builds and reads the evidence behind a lender-grade feasibility study. The site's methodology page describes the study itself: the trade area, demand, competition, the site, the financial model and the coverage test. The series goes one level down. It explains where each number in a study comes from, what a public loan record can and cannot prove, what each lending program actually tests, and how a study answers each of those tests with evidence a credit officer can check.

The articles are written for three readers at once. A borrower can use them to see what a lender will ask before the application goes in. A loan officer or a Certified Development Company can use them to judge whether a study in the file answers the program's own questions or only repeats the sponsor's hopes. A reviewer can use them to trace any figure back to the page or the loan file it came from. Every article follows the same rules, so a reader who learns how one is built can audit all of them.

How Every Article in the Series Is Built

Four rules hold across the series, and the gates the articles pass before publication enforce them.

First, every outside fact is quoted from a saved copy of a public primary source, with the address beside it in the Sources list: the Code of Federal Regulations, the United States Code, the Federal Register, SBA's program and data pages, USAspending, Census, BEA, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, NCHS and USCIS. Where an article says what a regulation requires, the words come from the regulation. SBA's business loan rules, for instance, allow the agency to ask for a feasibility study among the conditions it attaches to a loan [1].

Second, every loan figure is printed from the Loan Analytics loan dataset and carries its key. The dataset holds SBA 7(a) and 504 approvals from the agency's public loan files; the slice the articles use most covers fiscal years 2017 to 2026, which holds 647,329 [2] approvals, of which 182,784 [3] fall inside the asset classes the site covers. Each figure carries either a FIGURES id (a national figure) or a cell key (a state, asset class or program slice), and the Sources entry names the dataset release it came from, so a reader can find the exact row.

Third, loss and cancellation rates are measured by approval cohort and printed as floors, because loans still open can still be charged off, and a rate resting on fewer than 30 loans is withheld rather than shown. The articles in the first group explain why in detail.

Fourth, where an article discusses debt service coverage, the equity a borrower brings, or how an acquisition is tested, it uses the same conventions as the site's worked examples, and says so in one fixed line:

Conventions. This article follows the conventions of the Loan Analytics worked examples. Coverage is tested against the program floor the site's program page states, where the program has one, and against a stated 1.25x lender assumption, and the higher of the two binds. Equity is measured at the loan the cash flow supports, with fees recomputed on that loan. An acquisition is tested on the seller's historical earnings, not on projections.

The loan figures this page leans on are collected below with their keys.

Loan Data Behind This Article

Every figure in this table comes from the Loan Analytics loan dataset, analytics-loan-data freeze-3 (commit 360c856), and carries its key. SBA rates are approval-cohort floors and are withheld when fewer than 30 loans stand behind them.

Table 1. Loan figures the series hub uses
FigureValueBasisKey
All 7(a) and 504 approvals, FY2017 to FY2026 (the cell universe)647,329FIGURES U.APPROVALS_FY2017_2026 [2]
Approvals inside the site's asset classes, FY2017 to FY2026182,784FIGURES U.IN_ASSET_CLASSES [3]
7(a) and 504 approvals, FY202584,840FIGURES SBA.ALL.FY2025.APPROVALS [4]
7(a) and 504 gross approved dollars, FY2025$45.09 billionFIGURES SBA.ALL.FY2025.GROSS_USD [5]
Car wash 7(a) approvals, all states, FY2017 to FY20262,713cell PA-C02-7A (metrics.approval_count.value) [6]
7(a) charge-off floor, FY2017 to FY2021 cohort6.33 percentFIGURES SBA.7A.COHORT_FY2017_2021.CHGOFF_RATE [7]

Group A: How the Loan Data Is Built and Read

The first group explains the loan dataset itself: where it comes from, how it is checked, how loans are sorted into asset classes, what its rates mean and where it falls silent. For scale, SBA's files for fiscal year 2025 alone carry 84,840 [4] approvals across both programs.

Group B: Underwriting Method

The second group covers the analytical core of a study, the tests a lender applies when it decides whether the cash flow can carry the debt. SBA's own rules treat a feasibility study as something the agency may require as a condition of a loan [1], and these articles set out what such a study has to contain to be worth requiring.

Group C: Asset-Class Method

The third group takes one asset class per article and applies the general methods to it. Each sets out the demand model for the class as equations with labelled inputs, the metrics a lender reads and how each is evidenced, the class's own record from the cells with every rate printed as a floor, the eligibility rules that bear on it, and a short worked model. The full worked example for a class, where the site has one, is linked from its article. The record differs widely from class to class: the car wash class alone carries 2,713 [6] 7(a) approvals in fiscal years 2017 to 2026, while four of the fifteen (RV and boat storage, glamping, short-term rental and retail as a whole) are not separate classes in the dataset at all, and each of those articles names the neighbouring record it prints instead.

Group D: Program Method

The fourth group takes the financing programs one at a time and reads each program's own rules: what the regulation or statute tests, and how a study answers each test. The rules differ more than borrowers expect. USDA's Business and Industry guarantee, for example, starts from a definition of a rural area that leaves out larger cities and towns and their urbanized fringe, subject to exclusions the rule itself lists [8], a test no SBA loan has to pass.

Reading the Series With the Worked Examples

The series explains methods; the worked examples apply them to a single hypothetical project in a single state, with every assumption labelled. The two are meant to be read together. A reader who wants to see a coverage test computed end to end, on the conventions above, should open a worked example in the same program; a reader who wants to know why the test is set up that way should come back here. On the site's own methodology page, the coverage threshold is whatever the program and the lender demand, placed in a band between two ratios whose floors shift with the program and the size of the loan [9]; the program articles show where each of those floors comes from in the program's own texts.

Each article ends with the pages that sit next to it on the site: the program page, the data hubs by state and by asset class, the worked examples that use the same method, and any archived article that already covers a neighbouring question, so the series adds to what the site has published rather than repeating it.

Related Pages on Loan Analytics

Commission a Feasibility Study

Loan Analytics prepares lender-grade feasibility studies for SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry, conventional and EB-5 financing, built on the methods this series sets out. A study is not an appraisal: it tests whether a project's market, costs and cash flow can carry the debt a lender is asked to approve. To discuss a study for your project, contact Loan Analytics.

Daniel Smith, MAI, Loan Analytics

Sources

  1. U.S. Small Business Administration, 13 CFR part 120 (1-1-26 edition), via GPO govinfo. 13 CFR 120.160(b). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2026-title13-vol1/pdf/CFR-2026-title13-vol1-part120.pdf (retrieved 2026-11-10).
  2. Loan Analytics loan dataset, analytics-loan-data freeze-3 (commit 360c856), FIGURES id U.APPROVALS_FY2017_2026: All 7(a) and 504 approvals FY2017-FY2026 (the cell universe). Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov), as compiled by Loan Analytics. Data as of 2026-09-30; FIGURES compiled 2026-11-11.
  3. Loan Analytics loan dataset, analytics-loan-data freeze-3 (commit 360c856), FIGURES id U.IN_ASSET_CLASSES: Approvals FY2017-FY2026 whose NAICS code falls wholly inside one of the asset classes (39 after the owner's ruling of 2026-11-10; was U.IN_40_CLASSES at freeze 2). Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov), as compiled by Loan Analytics. Data as of 2026-09-30; FIGURES compiled 2026-11-11.
  4. Loan Analytics loan dataset, analytics-loan-data freeze-3 (commit 360c856), FIGURES id SBA.ALL.FY2025.APPROVALS: Gross 7(a) plus 504 approvals in FY2025. Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov), as compiled by Loan Analytics. Data as of 2026-09-30; FIGURES compiled 2026-11-11.
  5. Loan Analytics loan dataset, analytics-loan-data freeze-3 (commit 360c856), FIGURES id SBA.ALL.FY2025.GROSS_USD: Gross 7(a) loan amounts plus 504 debentures, FY2025. Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov), as compiled by Loan Analytics. Data as of 2026-09-30; FIGURES compiled 2026-11-11.
  6. Loan Analytics loan dataset, analytics-loan-data freeze-3 (commit 360c856), cell PA-C02-7A (all states, Car wash, 7(a), approvals FY2017 to FY2026). Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov), as compiled by Loan Analytics. Data as of 2026-09-30; cell computed 2026-11-11.
  7. Loan Analytics loan dataset, analytics-loan-data freeze-3 (commit 360c856), FIGURES id SBA.7A.COHORT_FY2017_2021.CHGOFF_RATE: Charge-offs to date / disbursed loans, 7A approval cohort FY2017-FY2021, seasoning 5.0 to 10.0 years at 2026-09-30; a floor: open loans are exempt from status disclosure (count: .CHGOFF_OPEN_IN_DEN) and the cohort is still accruing charge-offs. Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA loan files as of 2026-09-30 (data.sba.gov), as compiled by Loan Analytics. Data as of 2026-09-30; FIGURES compiled 2026-11-11.
  8. USDA Rural Development, 7 CFR part 5001 (1-1-26 edition), via GPO govinfo. 7 CFR 5001.3, Rural and rural area. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/cfr/7/5001?link-type=pdf&year=mostrecent (retrieved 2026-11-10).
  9. Loan Analytics (the site's own methodology page). Feasibility Study Methodology (analytics.loan methodology page). Data period page as retrieved 2026-11-11. https://www.analytics.loan/feasibility-study-methodology (retrieved 2026-11-11).