SBA 7(a) Fitness Center Feasibility Study in South Carolina

What SBA's own loan files show about SBA 7(a) lending to fitness center projects in South Carolina, and what a feasibility study for an SBA 7(a) loan there has to test.

Charge-offs set South Carolina gyms apart

The number that distinguishes fitness centers financed under SBA 7(a) in South Carolina is not their size but their losses. Of the 52 loans in South Carolina's early gym cohort, at least 25.0% have been charged off to date, and 11.5% of them were gone within five years of approval. Both stand as minimums, so the true figures can only be higher. For a lender weighing a gym loan in this state, that is the first thing the record says, and it is why a study here should spend more of its effort on downside cases than a study for a steadier class would.

South Carolina logged 144 fitness center approvals across FY2017 to FY2026, totalling $71.0 million. The state ranks 25 among states for the program's fitness loans by count, yet the class stands at 4 of 39 inside South Carolina itself, so gyms matter more to the state's own SBA lending than to the national picture. The median loan of $320,000 is 1.30x the national 7(a) figure for fitness centers, and half of the loans fall between $100,375 and $580,000. Franchise-affiliated borrowers make up 52.8% of loans, a majority, so a study must say whether the concept is a branded studio or an independent club.

Lenders and places

SBA lists a current holder for each loan. The Huntington National Bank holds 22, worth $5.4 million; Wells Fargo Bank National Association holds 14, worth $4.1 million; TD Bank, National Association holds 11, worth $2.8 million. Pinnacle Bank and Live Oak Banking Company hold 7 apiece, yet Pinnacle's come to $10.1 million against $3.9 million for Live Oak, which points to larger individual loans at Pinnacle. These are holdings in SBA's files and say nothing about any bank's standards. Charleston County leads with 28 loans, then Greenville with 23, Horry with 18, and York and Beaufort with 11 and 10. Approvals fell to 4 in FY2021, then recovered to 26 in FY2025.

Among South Carolina gym approvals made by FY2024, cancellation had a floor of 11.2%; counting loans still awaiting disbursement leaves the ceiling at the same 11.2%, so those add nothing to the count.

Tests a South Carolina gym project must pass

Membership economics decide whether these loans work. A study should estimate the households inside a realistic drive time, the price points of competing clubs and boutique studios, and the churn that every membership model absorbs, then show how many members the project needs to cover its debt payment. Equipment and build-out are the main costs, and equipment loses value quickly, so the study should show what a lender could recover if the club closes. With charge-offs this prominent, include a case in which membership ramps slowly and a case in which a larger competitor opens nearby. Seasonality on the coast, where Horry and Beaufort sit, deserves its own line in the forecast.

SBA 7(a) fitness center loans in South Carolina

Loans approved, FY2017 to FY2026144
Gross dollars approved$71.0 million
Median loan$320,000
Middle half of loans, from$100,375
Middle half of loans, to$580,000
Franchise share of loans52.8%
Rank among states for SBA 7(a) fitness center loans, by number of loans25
Rank of fitness center among classes in South Carolina4 of 39
Median loan against the national SBA 7(a) median for the class1.30x

Cancellation and charge-off

Cancelled after approval, FY2017 to FY2024 approvals (a floor) 11.2%
The same, counting loans still undisbursed as cancelled (a ceiling)11.2%
Charged off to date, FY2017 to FY2021 disbursed loans (a floor) 25.0%
Charged off within five years of approval11.5%
Loans in that cohort52

Both rates are floors. SBA withholds the status of open loans, so a loan counts as charged off only once SBA reports it; a rate needs at least 30 loans in its cohort and is otherwise not reported.

SBA 7(a) fitness center loans approved in South Carolina, by fiscal year

0102030FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026Loans, FY2017: 15Loans, FY2018: 10Loans, FY2019: 15Loans, FY2020: 12Loans, FY2021: 4Loans, FY2022: 5Loans, FY2023: 21Loans, FY2024: 16Loans, FY2025: 26Loans, FY2026: 20
Fiscal yearLoansDollars
FY201715$6.6 million
FY201810$3.7 million
FY201915$5.7 million
FY202012$6.9 million
FY20214$1.5 million
FY20225$1.3 million
FY202321$11.1 million
FY202416$7.9 million
FY202526$15.9 million
FY202620$10.3 million

Most active SBA lenders

SBA 7(a): lenders by loans approved (the current holder of each loan, as SBA reports it)
LenderLoansDollars
The Huntington National Bank22$5.4 million
Wells Fargo Bank National Association14$4.1 million
TD Bank, National Association11$2.8 million
Pinnacle Bank7$10.1 million
Live Oak Banking Company7$3.9 million

Where the loans are, by county

CountyLoans
CHARLESTON28
GREENVILLE23
HORRY18
YORK11
BEAUFORT10
RICHLAND8
BERKELEY7
LANCASTER7
DORCHESTER6
LEXINGTON6

Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 loan-level FOIA files (data.sba.gov), as of 2026-09-30; Loan Analytics loan-outcome cell SAP-SC-C33-7A.

Loan Analytics prepares the feasibility study a lender reads before it commits: for a fitness center project in South Carolina, financed under SBA 7(a), SBA 504, USDA Business and Industry or a conventional bank loan. Tell us the project and the lender's deadline, and we reply with scope, timeline and fee.

Request Scope & Timeline

Start with the data.

Contact Us