What Our SBA Feasibility Studies Cover

Every SBA feasibility study we produce is organized around the analytical dimensions that drive credit decisions. We do not follow a one-size-fits-all template. The scope and emphasis of each study is calibrated to the specific property type, market, and lending structure involved. That said, every study addresses these core areas:

​

Market Demand Analysis

This is the foundation of the entire study and the section that receives the most scrutiny from lenders. Our market demand analysis answers a deceptively simple question: is there enough demand in this market to support this project?

To answer it rigorously, we conduct a multi-layered evaluation that includes:

Trade Area Definition. We delineate the primary and secondary trade areas from which the project will draw its customers or tenants. Trade area boundaries are determined by drive-time analysis, competitive geography, and the demand characteristics specific to the property type. A hotel feasibility study defines its trade area differently than a gas station or self-storage facility, and our approach reflects those distinctions.

Demographic and Economic Profiling. We analyze the population, household income, employment, and spending patterns within the defined trade area to quantify the demand base. For projects that depend on visitor or transient demand rather than resident populations, we incorporate tourism data, traffic counts, event calendars, and other relevant demand generators.

Competitive Supply Inventory. We identify and profile every direct competitor within the trade area, including their capacity, pricing, market positioning, occupancy or utilization rates, and recent performance trends. The goal is to determine how much competitive supply already exists, whether the market is under-served or saturated, and where the proposed project fits within the competitive landscape.

Demand Quantification. We synthesize the demographic, economic, and competitive data into a specific demand estimate for the proposed project. This is not a vague statement about "favorable market conditions." It is a quantified projection of the customers, room nights, storage units, fuel gallons, or other demand metric relevant to the property type, supported by the evidence assembled in the preceding analysis.

Absorption and Stabilization Projections. For projects that will not achieve full capacity immediately upon opening, we model the absorption trajectory: how quickly the project will ramp from initial occupancy to stabilized performance, and what assumptions underlie that timeline.

​

Financial Feasibility and Pro Forma Analysis

The financial section translates the market demand analysis into dollars. Our financial feasibility assessment answers the question every lender ultimately cares about: can this project generate enough cash flow to service its debt?

Revenue Projections. We model top-line revenue based on the demand estimates developed in the market analysis, calibrated against pricing benchmarks from comparable operations. Revenue projections are built from the bottom up, not extrapolated from industry averages.

Operating Expense Modeling. We develop detailed operating expense projections using industry benchmarks, comparable property data, and the specific cost structure implied by the borrower's business plan. Key expense categories are broken out individually rather than lumped into a single operating ratio.

Debt Service Coverage Analysis. We calculate projected debt service coverage ratios (DSCR) under the proposed loan terms to determine whether the project can meet its debt obligations with an adequate margin of safety. Most SBA lenders require a minimum DSCR of 1.15x to 1.25x at stabilization, and our analysis is structured to address that threshold directly.

Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis. We stress-test the financial projections under downside scenarios: what happens if occupancy is 10% below projection, if average rates fall short, or if operating expenses exceed expectations? This analysis gives lenders visibility into the margin of error embedded in the base-case projections and helps borrowers understand the conditions under which their project remains viable.

Breakeven Analysis. We identify the occupancy, revenue, or unit-volume threshold at which the project covers its fixed costs and debt service. This provides a clear, intuitive benchmark that lenders and borrowers can use to evaluate project risk.

​

Technical and Operational Assessment

A project can have strong market demand and attractive financial projections and still fail if the operational concept is flawed, the site is unsuitable, or the management team lacks the capability to execute. Our technical and operational assessment addresses these execution risks.

Site Evaluation. We assess the physical characteristics of the proposed site, including access, visibility, zoning and entitlement status, environmental considerations, and infrastructure availability. For projects on undeveloped land, we evaluate construction feasibility at a high level.

Operational Concept Review. We evaluate the borrower's proposed business model, staffing plan, operational workflow, and management structure to determine whether the concept is executable as described. This includes an assessment of whether the borrower's operating assumptions are consistent with industry norms and comparable operations.

Management Capability. We assess the experience and qualifications of the management team relative to the demands of the proposed operation. For franchise operations, we consider the support infrastructure provided by the franchisor. For independent operators, we evaluate relevant experience, training, and any advisory resources available.

Risk Identification and Mitigation

Every feasibility study includes a structured assessment of the risks that could cause the project to underperform. We identify risks across four categories:

Market Risk. Potential changes in demand, competitive dynamics, demographic trends, or economic conditions that could affect project performance.

Financial Risk. Interest rate exposure, cost overrun potential, revenue concentration, and sensitivity to changes in key financial assumptions.

Operational Risk. Staffing challenges, supply chain vulnerabilities, technology dependencies, regulatory compliance requirements, and management succession concerns.

External Risk. Regulatory changes, environmental factors, infrastructure dependencies, and other forces outside the borrower's direct control.

For each identified risk, we assess the likelihood and potential impact, and where appropriate, we describe the mitigation strategies available to the borrower.

​

Property Types We Study

Loan Analytics has completed SBA feasibility studies across a broad portfolio of commercial property types. Our analytical approach is calibrated to the specific demand drivers, competitive dynamics, and performance metrics relevant to each asset class.

Hotels and Hospitality. Full-service, select-service, extended-stay, boutique, and resort properties. We analyze RevPAR, ADR, occupancy trends, demand segmentation (transient, group, contract), and competitive positioning within the local lodging market.

Gas Stations and Convenience Stores. We evaluate traffic counts, fuel volume potential, inside sales projections, brand economics, and the competitive fuel landscape within the primary trade area.

​

• Car Washes. Express, flex-serve, and full-service operations. Our analysis covers traffic exposure, membership potential, throughput capacity, and competitive density.

• Gas Stations. Truck Stops. With a C-Store, EV, QSR. 

• Self-Storage. Climate-controlled, drive-up, and mixed facilities. We analyze square-footage demand, occupancy trends by unit size, rental rate benchmarks, and competitive supply within the defined market radius.

• Restaurants and QSR Concepts. Independent and franchise operations. We evaluate foot traffic, daytime population, spending patterns, competitive dining supply, and concept-market fit.

• Medical and Dental Offices. We assess patient demand, referral patterns, provider supply, insurance mix, and the healthcare delivery landscape within the service area.

• Fitness Centers and Gyms. Including boutique studios, full-service clubs, and franchise concepts. We analyze membership penetration rates, competitive saturation, and demographic fit.

• Childcare and Early Education Facilities. We evaluate household density, dual-income household prevalence, existing childcare supply, waitlist dynamics, and state licensing capacity constraints.

• RV Parks and Campgrounds. We analyze visitor traffic patterns, seasonal demand curves, competitive supply, and the specific demand generators (national parks, recreation areas, interstate corridors) that drive occupancy.

• Wedding and Event Venues. We evaluate the regional wedding market, venue supply, average event pricing, booking lead times, and ancillary revenue potential.

• Mixed-Use Developments. Projects combining retail, office, residential, or hospitality components. We analyze each component independently and assess the synergies and risks of the combined program.

• Other Special-Purpose Properties. Bowling alleys, entertainment complexes, pet care facilities, vocational training centers, manufacturing facilities, and other asset types that fall outside conventional lending categories. If the SBA classifies it as special-purpose, we have studied it or can scope a study for it.

• USDA loan feasibility studies. B&I, VAPG. 

 

How Our Process Works

We have designed our engagement process to minimize the time between your initial inquiry and the delivery of a finished, lender-ready feasibility study.

​

Step 1: Initial Consultation and Scoping

Every engagement begins with a focused conversation about your project. We review the basic project parameters: property type, location, project cost, proposed SBA loan structure, and any lender-specific requirements or timelines. Most scoping conversations take 15 to 30 minutes. By the end of this call, we can provide a firm quote and estimated delivery timeline.

Step 2: Data Collection and Engagement

Once the engagement is confirmed, we collect the project materials needed to begin our analysis: the borrower's business plan, financial projections, site information, construction budget (if applicable), and any existing market research. We also collect the specific requirements or expectations communicated by the lender or CDC, so the finished study addresses their priorities directly.

Step 3: Market Research and Analysis

This is the most intensive phase. We conduct primary and secondary market research to develop the trade area profile, competitive supply inventory, demand quantification, and demographic and economic analysis that form the foundation of the study. Depending on the property type and market complexity, this phase typically requires 5 to 10 business days.

Step 4: Financial Modeling

With the market analysis complete, we build the project's financial model. Revenue projections are derived directly from the market demand analysis. Operating expenses are benchmarked against industry data and comparable operations. We model cash flow, debt service coverage, and breakeven under base-case and stress-case scenarios.

Step 5: Report Production and Quality Assurance

We draft the complete feasibility study, integrating the market analysis, financial model, technical assessment, and risk evaluation into a single, cohesive document. Every study goes through an internal quality review before delivery. We check data accuracy, logical consistency, formatting, and overall readability. The finished document is designed to stand on its own when it reaches the lender's credit committee.

Step 6: Delivery and Lender Support

We deliver the final study in both PDF and Word format. After delivery, we remain available to support the loan process. If your lender or CDC has questions, requests clarifications, or needs supplemental analysis, we address those requests directly and promptly. Our engagement does not end when the report is delivered. It ends when your loan is approved.

 

What Separates a Strong SBA Feasibility Study from a Weak One

Not all feasibility studies are created equal. Lenders who review dozens of these reports each year can immediately distinguish between a rigorous, independent analysis and a superficial document assembled to check a box. Here is what separates the two:

Independence and Objectivity

​

An SBA feasibility study must be prepared by an independent third party with no financial interest in the outcome of the loan. This is not a technicality. Lenders rely on the study's independence as a counterweight to the inherent optimism in the borrower's own projections. A study that reads like an advocacy document for the project raises red flags rather than resolving them.

At Loan Analytics, we approach every engagement with analytical objectivity. If our analysis reveals that a project's assumptions are unrealistic, that demand is insufficient, or that the financial projections cannot be supported by market evidence, we say so. Our credibility with lenders depends on our willingness to deliver honest conclusions, not favorable ones.

Specificity Over Generality

​

Generic feasibility studies that rely on national industry averages and boilerplate language consistently fail to satisfy experienced SBA lenders. A credit committee wants to see analysis specific to the proposed project's location, competitive environment, and customer base. They want to understand why this project, on this site, in this market, is viable.

Every study we produce is built from scratch for the specific project. The data is local. The competitive analysis names actual competitors. The financial projections reflect the actual cost structure and revenue potential of the subject property. There are no templates, no recycled paragraphs, and no filler.

​

Logical Coherence

The strongest feasibility studies follow a clear analytical thread from market analysis to financial projections to risk assessment. The revenue assumptions in the pro forma are directly supported by the demand analysis. The risk section addresses the specific vulnerabilities identified in the market and financial analysis. Every section reinforces and connects to the others.

Weak studies, by contrast, read like disconnected chapters assembled independently. The market section tells one story, the financial section tells another, and the risk section is an afterthought. Lenders notice this immediately, and it undermines their confidence in the entire document.

​

Appropriate Depth

A feasibility study needs to be thorough enough to answer the lender's questions but focused enough to remain readable and actionable. Studies that are too thin leave gaps that invite follow-up questions and delays. Studies that are bloated with irrelevant data obscure the key findings and frustrate busy credit analysts.

We calibrate the depth of each study to the complexity of the project and the expectations of the lending audience. A straightforward gas station feasibility study does not require the same level of analysis as a 200-room hotel in a competitive urban market. We invest analytical effort where it matters most and avoid padding where it does not.

 

SBA 7(a) vs. SBA 504: Feasibility Study Considerations

While the analytical framework for an SBA feasibility study is broadly consistent across programs, there are practical differences between SBA 7(a) and SBA 504 loan transactions that affect how the study is structured and reviewed.

​

SBA 7(a) Loans

The SBA 7(a) program is the agency's most flexible loan product, used for a wide range of business purposes including real estate acquisition, construction, equipment, and working capital. Feasibility studies for 7(a) loans are typically reviewed by the originating lender's credit committee and, for larger loans, by the SBA's own loan processing center. The lender has significant discretion in determining the scope and format of the feasibility study.

​

SBA 504 Loans

The SBA 504 program is specifically designed for major fixed-asset purchases, particularly owner-occupied commercial real estate. These loans involve a three-party structure: a conventional lender providing 50% of the project cost, a CDC providing up to 40% through an SBA-guaranteed debenture, and the borrower contributing at least 10% equity. Feasibility studies for 504 loans are reviewed by both the conventional lender and the CDC, and must satisfy both parties' analytical requirements.

For 504 transactions, Loan Analytics structures the feasibility study to address the evaluation criteria used by both the first-lien lender and the CDC. This dual-audience approach ensures the study serves both reviewers without requiring separate documents.

 

What Does Not Change

Regardless of whether the loan is processed under the 7(a) or 504 program, the core analytical requirements remain the same. The feasibility study must demonstrate market demand, financial viability, operational feasibility, and an honest assessment of project risks. The standard of analytical rigor does not vary by program.

 

Pricing and Turnaround

SBA feasibility study pricing depends on several factors: property type, project complexity, the scope of market analysis required, and any lender-specific deliverables. We provide a firm, all-inclusive quote before any work begins, so there are no surprises.

Turnaround for most SBA feasibility studies ranges from 10 to 16 business days, depending on the complexity of the analysis and the availability of project materials from the borrower. Expedited delivery is available for time-sensitive transactions.

We do not charge hourly. Our pricing reflects the complete scope of work from engagement through delivery and post-delivery lender support. Contact us for a project-specific quote.

​