top of page

Planning RV Park Development in the U.S.: An Investor-Focused Feasibility Guide





Introduction

Investing in RV park development can offer attractive returns, but it requires careful planning and rigorous analysis. The U.S. boasts roughly 15,000–16,000 RV parks and campgrounds generating over $10.7 billion in annual revenues as of 2023 Demand for outdoor travel has surged in recent years, fueled by shifting demographics and tourism trends. Unlike passive real estate assets, RV parks are operational businesses that combine real estate investment with hospitality management. This report provides a comprehensive roadmap for private investors and developers to plan a successful RV park project – from market analysis and site selection to feasibility studies, infrastructure planning, risk mitigation, financial modeling, and exit strategy formulation. The goal is to help investors make data-driven decisions, structure robust feasibility studies, and create actionable development plans consistent with an analytical, consulting-style approach.


Strategic Market Analysis: Demand, Demographics & Tourism Trends

Understanding the market landscape is the first step in planning an RV park. A strategic market analysis examines who your customers are, how demand is evolving, and the broader tourism environment:

  • Growing Demand and Industry Growth: RV travel demand has grown steadily over the past decade. Industry revenues expanded at a 4.3% CAGR from 2018–2023, reaching $10.7 billion. Even after a pandemic-era boom, forecasts suggest continued modest growth to around $11.4 billion by 2028. This growth is underpinned by a sustained national interest in outdoor recreation and road trips. In 2024 the National Park Service reported a record 331.9 million recreation visits, up 2% from the prior year – a clear indicator that Americans are traveling to parks and natural destinations in huge numbers. Such tourism tailwinds support ongoing demand for campgrounds and RV parks.

  • Demographic Shifts Expanding the Customer Base: RV parks are no longer catering only to retirees or “snowbird” travelers. Millennials and Gen Z now represent a large and growing segment of campers. According to Kampgrounds of America (KOA), one-third of new campers in 2022 were millennials, and the average age of RV owners has been dropping. Younger professionals and families are entering the market, often enabled by flexible work arrangements. Many discovered RVing during the COVID-19 pandemic and have continued the habit. These demographic tailwinds mean the pool of potential RV park customers is broadening – providing organic growth opportunities for park operators as a new generation embraces the RV lifestyle. Investors should target amenities and marketing to appeal to this diverse mix, from retired couples to young “weekend warriors” and remote-working nomads.

  • Tourism and Travel Trends: Domestic travel patterns strongly favor the RV park industry. Many Americans turned to RV travel as a safer, flexible vacation mode, and this trend persists. Surveys showed 61% of Americans planned an RV trip in 2023, up from 48% in the prior year, reflecting enduring enthusiasm for road travel. Popular tourist regions – from national parks to coastal areas – are seeing high camping demand. Parks near major attractions or event venues often enjoy full occupancy during peak seasons and holidays. For example, RV parks in gateway communities to national parks or near big seasonal festivals can sell out weeks in advance. This robust tourism demand underpins strong occupancy potential for well-located RV parks. However, it also means new entrants should carefully analyze local demand drivers (e.g. nearby attractions, seasonal visitation patterns) to ensure a proposed park aligns with tourism flows.

Actionable Insight: Conduct a thorough market analysis using current data. Evaluate nationwide trends (e.g. rising camper counts, younger demographics) alongside local market specifics. Analyze tourism statistics for your region – state park visitation, highway traffic counts, and nearby attractions’ visitor numbers. If possible, review industry reports (from sources like KOA or RV Industry Association) for demand insights, and consider commissioning a market feasibility study. A data-driven understanding of demand trends will ground your project in reality and help attract investors with compelling evidence.


Site Selection Criteria: Location, Land Use and Zoning

Choosing the right site is critical to an RV park’s success. Investors must balance market potential with practical development considerations and regulatory constraints. Key site selection criteria include:

  • Location & Accessibility: Favor sites with convenient access and strong appeal to travelers. Ideally, an RV park should be close to major highways or transit routes for easy RV access. Visibility from a well-traveled road is a plus. Proximity to popular tourist destinations (national parks, lakes, beaches, or urban attractions) can significantly boost demand. Research local tourism patterns to ensure there is a steady draw of visitors year-round or in the target season. Also consider essential services – being near fuel stations, grocery stores, and medical facilities enhances guest convenience. The location should strike a balance between offering a scenic, desirable setting and practical accessibility (big RVs need wide roads and turning radius). Community context matters too: an area that is generally supportive of tourism and outdoor recreation will ease operations, whereas a community averse to campgrounds could pose challenges.

  • Land Use, Zoning & Permitting: Before committing to land, thoroughly investigate zoning and land-use regulations. Ensure the parcel is zoned (or can be rezoned) for commercial recreation or campgrounds. Many municipalities have specific zoning designations or special use permit requirements for RV parks. Rezoning can be time-consuming and may require public hearings – factor this into your timeline. It’s wise to engage local planning officials early to understand any restrictions on density, site layout, building types, and even length of stay limits (some jurisdictions cap how long RVs can occupy a site continuously). Environmental and health regulations also come into play: check for floodplain issues, wetlands, or protected habitats on-site that could limit development. Utilities and sanitation will need health department approvals (e.g. septic system permits or wastewater treatment if not on city sewer). Overall, navigating zoning and permits is often the biggest hurdle – many promising projects stall due to zoning issues that could have been addressed early. Mitigate this risk by performing due diligence on all land-use regulations and even securing preliminary approvals or contingent purchase agreements before fully investing.

  • Physical Site Characteristics: Evaluate whether the land is actually suitable for an RV park layout. Consider the acreage and topology: is there enough flat or gently sloping land to accommodate the number of RV sites planned, plus internal roads and amenities? A typical park might require 20–30 acres for ~100 sites (including room for expansion and recreation) Assess soil quality and drainage – land that floods or stays muddy is problematic. Verify that utilities can be brought in (availability of electricity, ability to drill wells or connect to municipal water, and options for sewage disposal). The cost to extend power lines or install a well/septic system can be substantial for remote sites. Neighboring land uses should also be compatible; industrial or noisy neighbors could deter campers, while adjacent public lands or scenic areas are a bonus. In essence, a great site strikes a harmony between market appeal, regulatory compliance, and buildability.


Actionable Insight: Create a detailed site evaluation checklist. Include access distance from highway, visibility, proximity to attractions, zoning status, utility availability, environmental constraints, and community sentiment. Engage a local land-use attorney or consultant to vet zoning feasibility. It may save considerable time and money to secure an option on land and then pursue zoning changes or feasibility tests, rather than purchasing outright and discovering regulatory roadblocks. By front-loading due diligence on location and zoning, investors protect their capital and set the stage for a project that can actually be developed on schedule.


Feasibility Study: Capital Costs, Revenue Modeling & Breakeven Analysis

A comprehensive feasibility study is the cornerstone of planning an RV park investment. This study rigorously tests whether the project makes financial and operational sense. Investors and lenders expect such analysis to guide decision-making, and it forces the developer to plan realistically. Key components of an RV park feasibility study include:

Capital Expenditure (CapEx) Breakdown

Detail all upfront costs required to develop and open the RV park. Major capital expenditure categories typically include:

  • Land Acquisition: Purchase price of the land (which can range from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars per acre depending on location), plus closing costs. Don’t forget ongoing costs like property taxes, which might run ~1–2% of assessed value annually Land cost is often one of the largest single budget items and can vary widely based on proximity to high-demand areas.

  • Site Development: This encompasses grading and earthwork (to create level RV pads and roads), internal road construction (often gravel or paved loops able to handle heavy RVs), and pad installation. Each RV site pad may cost several thousands of dollars to construct, including concrete or gravel pad, a patio or picnic area, and a share of road/driveway cost. Development also includes utility infrastructure – running electrical lines (typically providing 50/30 amp service at each site), water distribution and sewer/septic systems, and stormwater drainage. In many cases, utility installation is the biggest cost after land. For example, installing a septic field or small wastewater treatment system can cost tens of thousands itself, and water wells or connections to city water likewise add cost. Permitting and professional fees (architectural designs, engineering, surveys, environmental studies, legal fees) are another significant component of CapEx. A feasibility study should line-item all these costs to arrive at a total project cost. On average, developing a mid-sized RV park from scratch can range from a few hundred thousand to a few million dollars in upfront investment, so accuracy here is vital.

  • Buildings & Amenities Construction: Include costs for any structures like the park office, a small clubhouse or community building, bathhouses with restrooms and showers, laundry facilities, and recreational amenities. Amenities such as a swimming pool, playground, or dog park can improve competitiveness but add costs. A modern RV resort with full amenities will be on the higher end of the cost range (including features like a clubhouse, paved pads, landscaped grounds, etc.). The feasibility study should consider what level of amenities is appropriate for the target market and budget accordingly. It's often wise to categorize amenities into “must-haves” versus “nice-to-haves” to prioritize spending.

  • Contingency: Given the likelihood of construction cost overruns or permitting delays, a prudent feasibility analysis builds in a contingency (e.g. 10–15% of project cost) to ensure financing can cover unexpected expenses.

By breaking down CapEx in detail, investors can see where the money goes and validate that cost assumptions are in line with industry benchmarks. If the total development cost appears too high relative to expected returns, now is the time to know – before money is spent.


Revenue Modeling and Occupancy Projections

The feasibility study must project the income streams of the RV park over time. This involves modeling occupancy, rates, and other revenue sources realistically:

  • Occupancy Rates: Avoid overly optimistic assumptions. New parks often take time to ramp up occupancy; you cannot assume 100% full from day one (or even ever, given seasonality). In fact, even a park that is fully booked every weekend might only achieve around 28% annualized occupancy when averaged over all days of the year. Industry-wide, average annual occupancy tends to hover around 50–70% for established parks, though this varies by region and season. Your model should incorporate seasonality – e.g. higher occupancy during summer and holidays (potentially near 100% at peak), and lower mid-week or off-season occupancy (which in colder climates could drop near zero in winter). Build a monthly occupancy forecast that reflects these patterns and consider a ramp-up period (perhaps 2–3 years) to reach steady-state occupancy as awareness grows.

  • Rate Structure: Determine the pricing strategy – nightly rates versus weekly or monthly stays. Many parks have tiered rates (higher in peak season, discounted off-season or for long-term stays). Research comparable parks’ rates in the region. For modeling, you might use an average daily rate (ADR) for transient guests and a monthly rate for seasonal occupants. For example, nightly site rates in the U.S. can range from ~$30 up to $100+ depending on location and amenities. Monthly site rentals might be in the few hundred dollar range (e.g. $300–$700/month) for long-term stays. Estimate the mix of short-term vs. long-term occupancy; many successful parks maintain a mix (e.g. 70% of sites dedicated to nightly/weekly campers and 30% to monthly or seasonal renters) to balance high-revenue transients with stable income from longer stays. The model should multiply expected occupancy by rates by number of sites to project site rental revenue. Additionally, include ancillary revenues: camp store sales, equipment rentals, Wi-Fi or cable fees, laundry, propane sales, etc. These can contribute a small but significant portion of income (often 5–15% of total revenue).

  • Breakeven and Profitability Analysis: Using the projected revenue and expense figures, calculate the breakeven point – i.e. how many occupied sites or what occupancy level is needed to cover all operating costs and debt service. This typically involves constructing an income statement for the park. Operating expenses for RV parks often range from 50% to 70% of revenue, yielding profit margins in the mid-teens on average. Key expenses include staffing, utilities, maintenance, insurance, supplies, and marketing. By modeling these, you can find the breakeven occupancy (the occupancy rate at which revenue equals expenses). For instance, if your pro forma shows $500,000 in annual operating costs (excluding depreciation) and your average revenue per occupied site-night is $50, you’d need 10,000 site-nights to breakeven (roughly 28 occupied sites per night out of 100 sites, or 28% occupancy year-round). This kind of analysis tells investors how robust the project is – a project that breaks even at 30% occupancy offers more cushion than one that requires 60% occupancy to break even. Feasibility studies also often include sensitivity analyses, showing how changes in key assumptions (e.g. a 10% drop in occupancy, or a delay in opening date) impact financial outcomes. Lenders will expect to see scenario testing to ensure the project can withstand realistic variances.

  • Return on Investment (ROI): Finally, the study should forecast profitability metrics over a multi-year period. Project the net operating income (NOI) after stabilization, and calculate expected returns such as cash-on-cash return, internal rate of return (IRR), or payback period on the initial investment. Industry benchmarks can help; for example, many investors target cap rates in the 8–10% range for RV parks, meaning if your park’s NOI is $200,000, it might be valued around $2–2.5 million (though cap rates vary by location and quality). Comparing the projected stabilized value to the total development cost yields an indication of the project’s value creation. If development cost is significantly higher than the likely market value, the project may not be feasible without adjustments.

Actionable Insight: Invest in a professional feasibility study. This should cover market analysis, competitive analysis, a detailed financial model, and a regulatory review. Be realistic with assumptions – as one industry expert warns, “don’t buy into the myth of ‘if you build it, they will come’”, since high occupancy is rarely instantaneous. Scrutinize whether your plan would still be viable at lower-than-hoped occupancy or higher costs. A robust feasibility study not only guides your own planning but is often required by banks or investors to secure financing. It demonstrates to stakeholders that you have a credible plan grounded in numbers, with clear breakeven targets and contingency plans.


Regulatory Compliance Considerations

No feasibility plan is complete without addressing compliance. Ensure that your project accounts for all legal and regulatory requirements, as failing to comply can derail an otherwise sound investment:

  • Zoning and Local Ordinances: Confirm that the development plan aligns with zoning approvals obtained (or to be obtained). The study should list any special use permits or variance needed and outline the process and timeline to get them. Include the costs of permitting and any exactions or impact fees local authorities impose.

  • Health and Safety Regulations: RV parks must typically comply with state and local health codes – for instance, standards for potable water supply, sewage disposal (often overseen by state environmental agencies), fire safety (adequate fire pits or fire rings, extinguishers, hydrants if required), and spacing requirements between units for fire and safety. Some states have specific campground regulations (e.g. requiring a certain number of bathrooms per campsites if RVs are not fully self-contained). The plan should acknowledge and budget for features like ADA-compliant facilities (a percentage of sites and facilities must accommodate guests with disabilities)and any other code-required infrastructure.

  • Environmental and Impact Studies: If your land might trigger environmental concerns (wetlands, endangered species, historical artifacts), you may need to conduct an environmental impact assessment. Identify if any federal or state environmental permits are needed (for example, disturbance of wetlands often requires Army Corps of Engineers permits, and construction stormwater permits may be necessary for land development). Being proactive with environmental consultants can prevent costly legal issues Also consider traffic impact studies if required by the county (an RV park might generate significant RV and vehicle traffic). The feasibility phase should outline these compliance steps and their implications.

  • Utilities and Licensing: Some states require an operational license or annual inspection for campgrounds/RV parks. Factor in the process to obtain a campground license if applicable. Also, plan the interfaces with utility regulators or providers – e.g. drilling a well might need water rights or permits; hooking to a sewer system might require agreements with a municipal utility. If the park will offer LP gas refills or other regulated services, include obtaining those permits/certifications.

In summary, feasibility planning must integrate regulatory compliance as a non-negotiable aspect of project viability. Ignoring these requirements can lead to project delays or shutdowns. By mapping out the regulatory roadmap early, investors can anticipate challenges and include the necessary time and cost in their planning.


Infrastructure and Amenities Planning

A successful RV park is more than just a plot of land – it requires well-designed infrastructure and the right mix of amenities to attract guests and generate repeat business. In planning your park’s layout and facilities, consider the following elements with an eye toward both guest satisfaction and long-term durability:

  • Utilities and Site Infrastructure: Modern RV travelers expect full utility hookups at each site: electricity (30/50 Amp service), fresh water, and sewage disposal (either a direct sewer hookup or access to a dump station). Designing the park’s utility grid is a major task. Early on, engage civil engineers to plan water supply (well or municipal connection), wastewater (septic fields, package treatment plant, or sewer tie-in), and electrical distribution. Make sure to size utilities not just for initial needs but for potential expansion. High-speed internet has become essentially a utility as well – many RVers are remote workers or streaming content, so plan for robust Wi-Fi coverage across the park. This may involve laying fiber-optic cables or installing mesh network antennas; it’s a significant cost but increasingly a “must-have” amenity on par with water and power. Additionally, consider adding a few EV charging stations as a forward-looking feature for guests with electric vehicles or electric RVs. Internal roads should be designed as loops or spurs that can handle large RVs (turning radii, clearance, and durable surfacing like gravel or pavement to avoid ruts). Lighting along pathways and roads improves safety for night arrivals. Lastly, don’t overlook stormwater management – incorporate drainage ditches, culverts, or retention ponds as needed to prevent erosion and flooding. Solid waste disposal should be planned (dumpsters in accessible yet screened locations). Building a resilient infrastructure base ensures the park operates smoothly and minimizes maintenance headaches.

  • RV Site Design (Pads): The layout and quality of the individual RV pads significantly influence guest experience. Provide a mix of pull-through sites (which allow big rigs to drive straight in and out) and back-in sites to accommodate different RV types. Pads should be level, with a stable surface (compacted gravel, concrete, or asphalt pads are ideal for stability). Spacing between sites is crucial – today’s RVs with slide-outs need ample room; generous spacing also creates a more pleasant, less crowded atmosphere. Many newer parks aim for upscale “big-rig friendly” sites of 60+ feet in length. Include a picnic table and fire ring at each site if possible. Landscaping (trees or shrubs) between sites adds privacy and appeal, though be mindful of future tree growth that could impede large RVs. Also plan for some tent sites or cabin rentals if you intend to diversify (depending on market demand, some parks add cabins or glamping tents as alternative accommodations). Providing a variety of site types can broaden your customer base. All site designs should incorporate a few ADA-accessible RV pads – typically wider pads with paved surfaces and close access to facilities – to comply with accessibility laws

  • Amenities and Guest Facilities: Amenities are a key differentiator in today’s RV park market. Modern campers, especially those with higher budgets, often seek resort-style features. At minimum, most parks offer a registration office (which can double as a general store for basic supplies and snacks) and a bathhouse(restrooms and showers) for tent campers or RVers who prefer larger facilities. Beyond that, consider what aligns with your target audience:

    • For family-oriented parks: a playground, splash pad or pool, and an open space for sports can be big draws.

    • For high-end resorts or 55+ snowbird parks: think clubhouse or community center where activities and social events can be hosted, perhaps a fitness room or lounge, and features like pickleball courts or a golf putting green.

    • Pet owners appreciate dog parks (off-leash fenced areas) on-site.

    • Nature-focused parks might include hiking trails, fishing ponds, or kayak rentals if near water.

    • Laundry facilities (coin-operated machines) are important for guests on extended trips.

    • A communal BBQ area or pavilion can encourage social interaction.

    Importantly, all amenities should be evaluated through an investment lens: Do they provide enough draw or revenue potential to justify their cost? Many amenities (store, equipment rentals, premium Wi-Fi tiers, etc.) can generate additional revenue. Others, like pools or clubhouses, may not directly pay back but can justify higher nightly rates and occupancies. Parks today are indeed “trending toward resort-like amenities and upscale experiences”, as guests expect more than a basic parking spot. However, amenities also increase operating costs (maintenance, staffing for events or stores, increased utilities). The plan should prioritize amenities that your target demographic values most and that align with the positioning of your park (e.g. luxury RV resort vs. rustic campground).

  • Technology Integration: Embrace technology both in amenities and operations. High-quality Wi-Fi was mentioned as critical; additionally, consider a modern reservation and check-in system (online booking, self-service kiosks or mobile app check-in). Some parks install security cameras at the entrance and around facilities for safety. Smart infrastructure (smart thermostats in buildings, app-controlled gate access, etc.) can improve efficiency. As a cutting-edge offering, a few parks are creating co-working spaces or quiet “work pods” for digital nomads, recognizing the rise of remote work tourism. These might be small air-conditioned rooms or sections of the clubhouse with desks, strong Wi-Fi, and coffee – a relatively low-cost amenity that can attract remote workers to stay longer.


Actionable Insight: Design the park to meet current and future guest expectations. In the planning phase, list all potential amenities and then perform a cost-benefit analysis for each. Engage an experienced RV park designer or consultant – they can ensure your utility layout is robust and that amenity placement is logical (e.g. bathhouses central to the sites, playground visible from many sites but buffered for noise). Keep scalability in mind: plan infrastructure with the capacity to add more sites or amenities later if land allows. By delivering a high-quality experience through well-planned infrastructure and amenities, your park can achieve higher occupancy, justify premium rates, and build a loyal customer base, all of which drive better financial performance.


Risk Analysis: Mitigating Market, Seasonal, and Regulatory Risks

Every investment comes with risks. For RV park developments, it’s crucial to identify the major risk factors and plan mitigation strategies from the outset. An analytical look at risk should cover:

  • Market Saturation and Competition: While national demand is growing, real estate is local – an oversupply of RV sites in a specific region can hurt occupancy and pricing. Investors should study the competitive landscape in the target area. If multiple new parks or expansions are underway nearby, the market could become saturated. Localized saturation can drive down occupancy and rates if too many sites chase the same campers. For example, if a region with cheap land and lenient zoning experiences a boom of new park developments, each park may struggle to fill sites. To mitigate this, aim to differentiate your park (through superior amenities, service, or a unique location) and avoid regions where supply growth is outpacing demand. Barriers to entry like difficult zoning can actually be a protective moat – they limit competition. The industry’s recent history shows limited new supply (many parks are decades old), which has kept overall occupancies strong. Still, an investor should conservatively underwrite revenue in case nearby competition increases. Performing a competitive analysis – examining existing parks’ occupancy and pricing – is an essential part of your feasibility study to gauge saturation risk.

  • Seasonality and Climate Risk: RV park income can be highly seasonal. Most parks see peak occupancy in summer months and major holidays, and far lower usage mid-week in shoulder seasons or wintern. In northern climates, a park might close or run at minimal occupancy during the cold winter, meaning the bulk of revenue must be earned in a 6–8 month window. This seasonality creates cash flow swings and the risk that an unusually bad season (e.g. a rainy summer or wildfire smoke deterring campers) could significantly impact annual revenue. Mitigation strategies include location selection (e.g. Sunbelt locations can attract snowbirds in winter, balancing out the year, whereas a mountain location might have a short summer season only)and diversifying the guest mix. Some parks secure seasonal contracts (for instance, long-term winter residents in Florida or summer seasonal sites in the north) to lock in revenue. Others plan events or off-peak attractions to draw visitors in shoulder seasons. From an investment perspective, ensure your financial model can handle the off-season carrying costs with peak-season profits. Building an indoor revenue stream (like rentals of on-site cabins year-round or an off-season storage service for RVs) can also help smooth revenue. Climate change also poses risk – extreme weather could affect certain regions more (e.g. hurricanes, wildfires). It’s prudent to have insurance and contingency plans for weather-related disruptions.

  • Regulatory and Compliance Risk: Regulatory factors can impact both development and ongoing operations:

    • Development Risk: As discussed, failing to obtain zoning or permits can halt a project. States and counties vary widely: for instance, some states (like Washington, California, Colorado) enforce stringent environmental and growth management regulations that can limit rural campground development, whereas others (in the Southeast or Midwest) may have more straightforward processes. An investor should assess the regulatory climate of the target state/county – are there moratoria on new campgrounds? Strict sewage treatment requirements? Public opposition in that area to tourism growth? Understanding these early is key. Mitigate development regulatory risk by working closely with local authorities, demonstrating how your project benefits the community (tourism dollars, jobs), and possibly phasing the project to meet any conditional requirements.

    • Operational Regulatory Risk: Once open, parks must adhere to various laws – for example, if local laws change to restrict short-term rentals or impose new taxes on camping (some municipalities have started charging lodging taxes on RV sites), it could affect profitability. There is also the risk of reclassification: in some areas, long-term RV stays begin to blur lines with mobile home parks, which could trigger different rules (like needing certain foundations or different tenant rights). Staying active in campground industry associations (like the National Association of RV Parks & Campgrounds, ARVC) can help owners stay ahead of regulatory changes. Additionally, compliance with health and safety standards (pool regulations, food service rules if you have a cafe, etc.) is an ongoing requirement – a serious violation could temporarily shut facilities or increase liability. To manage regulatory risk, build good relationships with regulators and perhaps engage a compliance officer or consultant for periodic audits of your operations.

  • Economic and Market Risks: Although not explicitly listed, investors should note macroeconomic factors. RV parks have been historically “recession-resistant”, as camping is a relatively affordable vacation, but severe recessions or fuel price spikes can still curtail travel. A sudden surge in gas prices may discourage long RV trips (though rising disposable incomes can mitigate this). In downturns, more budget-conscious travelers might actually boost camping, but it’s not guaranteed if unemployment rises. As a risk measure, maintain a financial cushion or line of credit to weather economic slowdowns, and consider dynamic pricing (discounts or specials) to stimulate demand if needed in slow periods.

  • Actionable Insight: Proactively plan for risks. Conduct a SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) for your RV park project in the planning phase. For each major risk, write down mitigation measures: e.g., for seasonality, plan operating budgets that assume no income for 3 months; for saturation risk, focus on underserved niches (luxury glamping, winter camping, etc.) that competitors don’t offer. It’s also wise to approach risk from a portfolio perspective – investors might mitigate risk by diversifying locations (own parks in different climates or markets) or by having multiple revenue streams. Remember that the buyer pool for RV parks, while growing, is still more limited than for mainstream assets like apartments. Thus, a park in trouble might be harder to offload quickly. This makes upfront risk planning even more critical to ensure the project is resilient and remains an attractive asset.


Financial Modeling and Exit Strategies

A sophisticated financial model and a clear exit strategy are essential components of an investment-focused development plan. These elements demonstrate how the project will generate returns and how investors can ultimately realize profits.


Investment Financial Modeling

Financial modeling for an RV park should integrate all the insights from market and feasibility analysis into a multi-year projection. Key features of a robust model include:

  • Detailed Pro Forma Projections: Build annual (or monthly) projections for at least 5–10 years, including revenue, operating expenses, debt service, and cash flows. Incorporate ramp-up assumptions (lower occupancy in initial years) and inflationary growth (e.g. modest annual rate increases, expense inflation). Ensure the model reflects seasonality – one method is to model by month for a typical year and then aggregate. The Net Operating Income (NOI) in a stabilized year is a critical output, as it drives the property’s valuation in the eyes of investors or future buyers.

  • Funding Structure and Returns: Include the planned financing structure – how much equity vs. debt will be used. Account for loan payments if using financing. Calculate investor return metrics: cash-on-cash return (annual cash flow divided by equity invested), IRR (taking into account cash flows and eventual sale), and equity multiples over the holding period. For example, if you invest $1 million equity and plan to sell in year 5, what total cash back (operating cash flow plus sale proceeds) might you expect? Lenders will look at metrics like Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) (NOI divided by debt service) to ensure the park can cover loan payments – typically a DSCR of at least ~1.25 is required for commercial loans. Your model should show DSCR compliance in each year of operation.

  • Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis: A good model isn’t static. Run scenarios such as worst-case, base-case, and best-case. For instance, a worst-case might assume slower occupancy ramp-up or higher operating costs, and see how that affects cash flow and the breakeven point. Sensitivity tables can illustrate how changes in a single variable (like ADR or occupancy) impact the ROI. This stress-testing is important to reassure investors that even if conditions are not ideal, the project remains solvent and eventually profitable.

  • Benchmarking and Validation: Compare your model’s outputs to known industry benchmarks to sanity-check it. If your plan shows a 50% profit margin, whereas most parks operate with 15–30% margins, you may be underestimating expenses. If you project 90% occupancy year-round, recall that few if any parks sustain that (except maybe in very special locations or year-round mild climates). Grounding the model in reality will make it more credible. Leverage industry data: e.g., typical capex per site, typical utility costs per occupied site-night, etc., many of which can be obtained from industry reports or by consulting experienced operators.

Actionable Insight: Use the financial model as a living tool. Continuously update it as actual data comes in (e.g., after opening, compare actual occupancy/rates to projections and adjust). Investors should require that the development team present a clear financial model before funding, and developers should be prepared to explain every assumption. If you are not comfortable building such a model, engage a financial analyst or consultant – given that RV parks are an income-focused asset, the credibility of your numbers is paramount to securing capital.


Exit Strategies for Investors

Seasoned investors always begin with the end in mind. An exit strategy outlines how and when investors can harvest returns or reallocate their capital. For an RV park development, consider these exit avenues:

  • Hold for Long-Term Cash Flow: Many private investors treat RV parks as income properties to hold indefinitely for cash flow and appreciation. The steady cash yield (often higher than apartments or other real estate classes) can make holding attractive. If this is the strategy, communicate the expected annual cash returns and plan for refinancing (e.g. after stabilization, refinance the property to return some equity to investors while holding the asset). A long-term hold still requires an eventual plan (succession or sale), but the focus is on maximizing ongoing NOI and perhaps expanding the park to increase value over time.

  • Reposition and Sell: Another strategy is to build or acquire, stabilize, then sell. Many investors aim to buy land, develop the park, lease it up to a stable occupancy with proven income, and then sell the asset at a higher valuation (based on the stabilized NOI and prevailing cap rates). The buyer pool for RV parks is growing and includes larger real estate funds, REITs, and institutional investors. If you plan to sell to such an operator, design the park and its financial records to institutional standards (clean bookkeeping, documented operating procedures, etc.). Keep in mind that the RV park buyer pool, while expanding, is still smaller than for more conventional assets – so liquidity is a bit lower. However, in recent years large players (e.g. Sun Communities, Equity LifeStyle Properties, KOA franchises) have been actively acquiring quality parks, especially those in prime tourist locations. Exiting via a sale to one of these companies or a private equity-backed operator is a realistic path if you’ve created a high-performing asset. Target a cap rate compression scenario: for example, develop at a 10% yield on cost and sell at a 7-8% market cap rate, capturing value uplift.

  • Partial Exit or Recapitalization: Not all exits are a full sale. Some investors may plan a recapitalization after stabilization – bringing in new investors or refinancing debt to pull out equity. For instance, after the park has a two-year income history, you might secure a larger mortgage or an SBA refinance and use the proceeds to return capital to the original investors, thereby de-risking the investment while continuing to operate. Alternatively, one could bring in a partner (say a real estate fund) to buy a stake in the park at its now higher valuation, providing liquidity to early investors. This strategy can be useful if the original plan was to improve operations or add value and then lighten the investment exposure without fully exiting.

  • Alternate Use or Land Sale: Always have a “Plan B” for exit, especially in development. Consider the highest and best use of the land: if the RV park concept doesn’t pan out as hoped, is the land versatile for other uses (e.g. mobile home community, subdivision, or other commercial use)? While one hopes not to pivot, having land in a good location provides fallback options. In a worst-case scenario, the exit might be selling the undeveloped (or partially developed) land to cut losses – this underscores the importance of site selection (choose land that has intrinsic value and multiple possible uses, not something so specialized that it’s only good for an RV park).


Actionable Insight: Define your exit strategy early and align your business plan accordingly. If you plan to sell in 5 years, prioritize decisions that maximize exit value: invest in marketing to quickly ramp up occupancy, document strong financials, and perhaps avoid overly customized features that only you can manage. If you plan to hold for decades, design for durability and lower long-term maintenance, and maybe avoid over-leveraging with debt. Also, never enter an investment you can’t ultimately exit – one expert advises to “never buy an RV park that you cannot easily finance or easily sell down the road” as a guardrail for investment decisions. By thinking about the exit from the beginning, you ensure the development is structured to meet your financial goals, whether that’s steady cash flow or a profitable sale.


Conclusion

Developing an RV park in the United States is a complex venture that blends real estate development, tourism, and hospitality management. For private investors and real estate developers, the key to success lies in rigorous upfront planning and analysis. By conducting strategic market research, choosing the site wisely, and insisting on a detailed feasibility study, you lay a solid foundation for the project. Careful infrastructure and amenity planning will position the park to capture the modern camper’s interest, while proactive risk management will protect the investment through market fluctuations and seasonal swings. Finally, a robust financial model paired with a clear exit strategy ensures that the venture remains focused on delivering strong returns.


In essence, planning an RV park is akin to planning any substantial business – it requires data-driven decisions, a clear-eyed view of costs and revenues, and alignment of the product (the campground experience) with market demand. The outlook for the RV park industry remains positive, with favorable demographics and America’s enduring love of the outdoors driving demand. However, competition and customer expectations are higher than ever, so only well-conceived projects will thrive. For investors willing to do their homework and perhaps get a little hands-on in the hospitality aspect, RV parks represent a compelling investment avenue with potential for attractive yields and long-term value.


Sources: The analysis above references industry data and expert insights, including RV park market reports, development guides, and financial benchmarks from U.S. campground operations. These sources underscore the importance of thorough feasibility planning and provide benchmarks to guide successful RV park investment strategies.

 
 
 
bottom of page